Quote:
Originally Posted by jw209
Quick question that seems to be up for debate per some posts above: Are the 30s considered upper or lower pavilion? It does seem strange that the 40s would be the only area considered 'upper', given WH was allowing 4 tickets for that area and it's so small.
Have to disagree with the poster who said the last section in the pavilion (40s) isn't worth it, though. I've sat in those bench seats for a couple shows, including DMB last year, and I've found they provide a significant advantage over the lawn. Frankly, the lawn at Blossom, IMO, sucks. It's VERY hard to see compared to lawns at other venues due to the distance and the way the roof comes so far down. And ever since they added the 40 sections, it's even harder. To me, lawn at Blossom is just severely pointless if you have any interest in seeing anything, whereas I've found the 40 sections to actually provide a decent view.
|
In my experience, from the WH, the 30's are considered uppers. the 10's sections seem to be almost impossible to snag unless you are paying for premiums, platinum, or have season tickets (although sometimes you can get lucky). I do stand by my statement though on the 40's. To me it's either Row A, or not at all. I'd rather be in the lawn than in rows B or worse in the bench seats. Row A is great value, but everything behind it is packed in too close for my comfort, no cup holders, hard to see over people in front of you, etc. Lawn sucks at blossom, but you can make the best of it if you get there early--i typically only do lawn if I'm in a big group or at a show i dont really care too much about.