Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee3691
To Kevin's point, one of the weakest parts of the story was that they made Magneto and Professor X too young. I'm supposed to believe that in 17 years after Apocalypse that they look like their selves in Xmen (org movie)?
|
I have a very expansive mind when it comes to remembering what kind of movie I'm watching and letting go of reality...but yeah, James McAvoy/Xavier works, but man, Magneto is going to have to have some really rough years up ahead to look like he did in 2000. I just think they jumped decades to quickly. Quicksilver hasn't aged a bit in 10 years, and neither has Hank, Magneto, Xavier, Alex Summers...That's nit picking, and really didn't bother me much. Plus, they're mutants, so maybe someone like Quicksilver ages differently.
Ironically, this movie felt like X-Men Last Stand in terms of quality and feel. I say ironically since they made that joke about the 3rd (X3) movie not being any good. My point being, I enjoyed X3 and didn't think it was as bad as some say, but I get that it wasn't as good as the first two. That's how I felt about this. Good overall, but just didn't really do much for me either. It's just kind of there. I totally disagree that this movie was better than BvS...but we don't need to go there.....again.
Interesting about the timeline. So basically the first two movies are pointless now? Kind of a weird choice in direction. I know people wanted the first Wolverine erased from existence, but 1 & 2 are great and 3 was at least OK, I thought.