Quote:
Originally Posted by temptedcandyman
what the fuck... that show looks amazing. i dont have lt5 so i dunno (only missing 9 and 5) but come on.
to those who have it, does it compete performance wise to the originally chosen set..? cause that set on paper is gold.
|
I think quality of the recording is as important as performance. In ranking the LT's
I have a hardtime judging which is better LT5 or LT8 they are both close.
I know people jizz or LT1 but I don't get it. It's good yes but I don't think it's superb or great (flame away) I prefer Live in Chicago. For the record I don't have LT12 yet.
1 LT5 (as I said superb recording, superb performace, and superb setlist)
2 LT8 (superb recording, superb performance, great setlist)
3 LT11 (great recording-but not superb, great performance, great setlist)
4 LT10 (great recording, great performance, good setlist)
5 LT7 (good recording, great performance, great setlist)
6 LT1 (good recording, great performance, good setlist)
7 LT2 (average recording, great performance, great setlist)Santana puts this over LT3
8 LT3 (great recording, good performance, great setlist)
9 LT6 (average recording, good performance, great setlist)
10 LT9 (average recording, good performance, good setlist)
11 LT4 (good recording, average performance, good setlist)
Something about LT4 is lackluster.
-T