Quote:
Originally Posted by thebridge15
why can't they just put him in a movie? people know who spider-man is
|
Obviously they know who Spider-Man is, but Marvel doesn't want any baggage from those movies. You and I could probably accept the same actor and get that his timeline is now different, but there would be people who were confused.
The Spider-Man universe they were building Oscorp was responsible for most of the villians. They showed the ones that were to come next. I gave an example of how you can tease Venom in a post-Guardians credit. If you stick with Garfield then it's back to project Venom or w/e it was on the screen. Even if you start a new timeline it would confuse people who've seen Garfield in two movies already.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MOWJO8185
I did see one write-up that basically said that if it's not Garfield, there won't be as much significance to him unmasking himself in Cap 3. Which is a fair point. The significance of him unmasking himself is kind of tied to what we know of Peter Parker personally, and if Spider Man is essentially re-introduced in Cap 3, there's not going to be a lot of depth to him yet, I wouldn't think.
|
1.) We still would know it's Peter Parker
2.) Regardless of who's playing him Spider-Man has always tried to keep his identity a secret. Sure maybe Thor, Iron Man, Captain America, ect. don't care about there identity. What will Spider-Man, Daredevil, and other new people in the MCU who do lead a double life feel about that?
I don't think we need a personal connection to the new Spider-Man to understand the gravity of him doing that.