Quote:
Originally Posted by RainDog1980
People are expecting a bad album based on the band’s “track record”, but also have hope that they’ll pull out a “Taylor 3am” version, something they’ve never historically done? It took 20 year anniversaries to get reissues with some bonus stuff… and only UTTAD had that.
And people will be mad/disappointed when it doesn’t happen.
|
So I’m probably being roped into the bad album camp which I think we can discuss a bit.
I don’t think it will be “bad”. I think it will be good. However will it feel like a band album or a Dave solo album. Because I want a great full band album. I’d be thrilled with a solid full band effort. But the issue comes in when it’s a half band half solo album because that’s what lead to CT. A jumbled mess with no flow without featuring the musicianship we know they possess.
Album can still be good from a 100 foot view. But it might not feel like a band album which is sort of a separate category at this point. Non band albums have a bit more leeway where we can just focus on Dave. Bring the band in and I’m expecting them to utilize them otherwise what’s the point right?
The good news is if it’s good music regardless that’s the priority whether it’s what I wanted or not and I’ll accept it but I still might have questions and complaints because I know what could be if they just make some different decisions.
I think that’s fair way to look at it.
I also think it’s fair to want answers of why an album was mentioned 3 years ago and then we get half a solo half band album if that scenario plays out. Perfectly reasonable when they take all my money because I refuse to leave this abusive relationship
.