*Prompter Thread* (NO personal attacks, NO trolling)

[cazzie34]

Originally Posted by BruceW

Since you "can't support the left" (for whatever reason), I still would like your response to these:

- the Woodward book
- Trump calling our troops “losers” and “suckers”
- Trump giving the old “wink-wink” about a COVID vaccine being ready by a “special date”
- DHS suppressing Russian interference intel
- growing evidence of Russian election meddling
- Trump calling American education radicalized and signing a (meaningless) EO to force feed kids a more sterile and patriotic history instead of the truth about America
- Calling the head of the CDC a liar
- incorrectly stating the US would have numbers that would be the best in the world if you took out COVID deaths in blue states, when in actuality we'd still be 2nd in the world in deaths if only counting red states.
- Being accused of yet another sexual assault
- Telling those out in California that “it will cool down just watch. Science doesn’t know”
- giving aid to Puerto Rico 3 years after the hurricanes and only 6 weeks before the election, while claiming "I'm the best thing that has ever happened to Puerto Rico"
- Lying multiple times at his town hall and getting called out for it
- encouraging and praising violence against the media
- referencing "Racehorse theory" and "good genes" at a rally

Would like to hear your thoughts and feelings on these please.

No offense but these "please comment" posts look worse for the Dems requesting than it does the republicans not responding.

[MDPrompter]

Originally Posted by trd1610

it comes down to this weird line of thinking that permeates american politics where it's normal and justified when republicans utilize the power they've won and tools at their disposal to do things in they want

but it's tearing down the constitution and the destruction of our democracy when the democratic party attempts to do anything remotely similar; even if said things are actually more stabilizing to the democracy (equal representation for all americans, modifying the SC, easing the ability of elected officials to pass legislation they were elected to enact)

Absolutely!

[BTBaboon]

Originally Posted by cazzie34

No offense but these "please comment" posts look worse for the Dems requesting than it does the republicans not responding.

I don't think something like this has anything to do with Democrats/Republicans.

It has a lot to do with an individual who can't converse in a social forum because they lack A) basic understand on a plethora of issues B) the ability to debate with facts and reason.

Let's not make this something bigger than it is. Aparker is just bad at discussing this stuff. He's entitled to ignore whatever he wants, but it just makes it annoying when he pops in to talk about his culture war pet issues when the adults are talking.

[BTBaboon]

Like I said, though, we know enough about Aparker to make judgement. He's presented lies, claims that fly in the face of facts - either with intent or out of ignorance - and he's a transphobic bigot who bought hook line and sinker into the whole bathrooms argument.

[BruceW]

Originally Posted by cazzie34

No offense but these "please comment" posts look worse for the Dems requesting than it does the republicans not responding.

That's fine if that's your opinion. I disagree.

I think it's fair to ask a Trump voter's opinion on instances that have occurred within the last 2 weeks that relate to their candidate.

We don't get many comments from trump voters, and I think it's interesting to hear their point of view.

[Rodey]

Originally Posted by Climb2safety

They were dumb?

Yes, the founders were dumb about a lot of things.

[mYeAgZ55]

i'd like to proposed a constitutional amendment where we stop deifying the founders.

[Climb2safety]

Originally Posted by trd1610

let us also be honest, the dakotas could just be absorbed into one state, or new hampshire and vermont could just be absorbed into one state, or wyoming and idaho.

i haven't heard a convincing argument as to why DC shouldn't be other than, "why do we need more states? why change things?" etc.

my stance on PR is that they should be a state if they want to be a state, that option should be theirs

Originally Posted by BTBaboon

Wonder if Madison envisioned citizens residing in this federal district without House or Senate representation?

Curious.

I’m assuming you would support retrocession then?

Simply have what Maryland gave to DC reabsorbed. Win win.

[mthawk07]

Originally Posted by mYeAgZ55

i'd like to proposed a constitutional amendment where we stop deifying the founders.

Oh my god you’re so un-American.

[coldengrey12]

Originally Posted by mYeAgZ55

i'd like to proposed a constitutional amendment where we stop deifying the founders.

They weren't any better or worse than we are today

[Climb2safety]

Originally Posted by mdmarvich

Climb - why don't you apply the same "why didn't the founders" logic to # of SCOTUS Justices?

I want to make sure I am following. As in why didn’t they stipulate an exact number?

[space_raven]

Originally Posted by BTBaboon

I don't think something like this has anything to do with Democrats/Republicans.

It has a lot to do with an individual who can't converse in a social forum because they lack A) basic understand on a plethora of issues B) the ability to debate with facts and reason.

Let's not make this something bigger than it is. Aparker is just bad at discussing this stuff. He's entitled to ignore whatever he wants, but it just makes it annoying when he pops in to talk about his culture war pet issues when the adults are talking.

still doing this bit... nice

[Climb2safety]

Originally Posted by mYeAgZ55

i'd like to proposed a constitutional amendment where we stop deifying the founders.

I support a living constitution.

[mYeAgZ55]

I imagine if James Madison and Ben Franklin were teleported to today, and saw that we've only changed the constitution 27 times in 250 years or whatever, they'd lose their shit.

Hopefully they wouldn't parse the list too much and noticed that two of those have to deal with the prohibition and then re-legalization of alcohol. What a waste of time and energy. Franklin would be super pissed. Early to bed early to rise, and ya'll just wasted months on this shit?

[coldengrey12]

Originally Posted by ricky towel

It means Trump is going to try and withhold federal funding.


“ Rather than idle words, the designation has potential financial consequences. President Trump issued a memo earlier this month directing the DOJ to identify jurisdictions that, in its view, were not enforcing the law appropriately. Designated cities could lose their federal funding.

Trump's order gives the director of the Office of Management and Budget 30 days to issue guidance to federal agencies on restricting eligibility for federal grants for the cities on the DOJ list. Such grants make up a huge portion of NYC's already strapped annual budget -- more than $7 billion in fiscal 2021 alone, or 7.5% of the city's projected total revenue.”

Is this defunding the police to pwn the libs?

[Climb2safety]

Space!

Let’s hear some perspective on recent events!

[BTBaboon]

Originally Posted by space_raven

still doing this bit... nice

Do some of y'all have an alert set for the word "trans"? Seems like a bat signal for y'all.

What's the bit, I'm not sure I follow?

[Climb2safety]

Originally Posted by mYeAgZ55

I imagine if James Madison and Ben Franklin were teleported to today, and saw that we've only changed the constitution 27 times in 250 years or whatever, they'd lose their shit.

Hopefully they wouldn't parse the list too much and noticed that two of those have to deal with the prohibition and then re-legalization of alcohol. What a waste of time and energy. Franklin would be super pissed. Early to bed early to rise, and ya'll just wasted months on this shit?

They literally created a way to amend the constitution when it was written.

Why would you think this?

[space_raven]

Originally Posted by Climb2safety

Space!

Let’s hear some perspective on recent events!

M A G A

Originally Posted by BTBaboon

Do some of y'all have an alert set for the word "trans"? Seems like a bat signal for y'all.

What's the bit, I'm not sure I follow?

im not following the thread, just saw you do the ANSWER THIS:


SEEEEEE! YA CANT!


type stuff

[trd1610]

Originally Posted by Climb2safety

I’m assuming you would support retrocession then?

Simply have what Maryland gave to DC reabsorbed. Win win.

it wouldn't be my preferred method of resolution, but if congress wanted to pass such a thing they could certainly attempt to do so.

[BTBaboon]

Originally Posted by space_raven

im not following the thread, just saw you do the ANSWER THIS:


SEEEEEE! YA CANT!


type stuff

Um, you're mistake. That was not me

[space_raven]

Originally Posted by BTBaboon

I don't think something like this has anything to do with Democrats/Republicans.

It has a lot to do with an individual who can't converse in a social forum because they lack A) basic understand on a plethora of issues B) the ability to debate with facts and reason.

Let's not make this something bigger than it is. Aparker is just bad at discussing this stuff. He's entitled to ignore whatever he wants, but it just makes it annoying when he pops in to talk about his culture war pet issues when the adults are talking.

Originally Posted by BTBaboon

Um, you're mistake. That was not me

oh, alright


carry on

[BruceW]

Originally Posted by space_raven

M A G A


im not following the thread, just saw you do the ANSWER THIS:


SEEEEEE! YA CANT!


type stuff

That was me that asked, not Baboon. I'd pose the same ones to you as well. Genuinely curious.

[BTBaboon]

Originally Posted by space_raven

oh, alright

carry on

Those are true statements. But I didn't do what you implied...

You weren't around, but aparker made the very unfortunate mistake a few weeks back of making some absurd claims on the economy which were easily debunked with data and sources. It was a terrible look. He seems very fixated on culture war stuff as well. And as for the transphobic stuff; a bigot is a bigot.

[Antiramie]

Originally Posted by space_raven

M A G A


im not following the thread, just saw you do the ANSWER THIS:


SEEEEEE! YA CANT!


type stuff

This is the type of mentality that's ruining this country...that trying to get people to acknowledge facts and data over anecdotal evidence is some kind of "gotcha!" game or elitism.

[BruceW]

Originally Posted by Antiramie

This is the type of mentality that's ruining this country...that trying to get people to acknowledge facts and data over anecdotal evidence is some kind of "gotcha!" game or elitism.

Yep. That along with their initial response of "M A G A".

[Antiramie]

Originally Posted by BruceW

Yep. That along with their initial response of "M A G A".

Pride goeth before a fall.

[aparker507]

Originally Posted by BTBaboon

Those are true statements. But I didn't do what you implied...



You weren't around, but aparker made the very unfortunate mistake a few weeks back of making some absurd claims on the economy which were easily debunked with data and sources. It was a terrible look. He seems very fixated on culture war stuff as well. And as for the transphobic stuff; a bigot is a bigot.

Almost back to what I told you the other day, but I'm going to try and not go there again. But I do love the personal attacks. Keep it up.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[cazzie34]

Now here's an ad for you: Sen. Kelly Loeffler's new spot is all about how she's "more conservative than Attila the Hun," and includes an actor portraying a grunting Attila who delivers orders to, among other things, "eliminate the liberal scribes." https://t.co/080nIJGwng

What the fuck. They live in a different universe than normal people.

[Antiramie]

Originally Posted by aparker507

Almost back to what I told you the other day, but I'm going to try and not go there again. But I do love the personal attacks. Keep it up.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

You going from refusing to face facts to just not bringing up anecdotal evidence to avoid being called out doesn't take the target off your back...FYI.