Quote:
Originally Posted by elconguero
Do we know that “they don’t let them” or are we assuming that?
Roi and Boyd, as much smack as people talk about Boyd, were very creative and melodic. Jeff doesn’t seem that way to me. He seems more technical and in your face. Boyd was a dead head and roi a seasoned jazz man.
And the trumpet unless muted is by nature loud. Roi weaved his voice throughout songs. Repeated Dave’s melody, had a sense of humor and Boyd also could do these things although not as consistently good as roi. Jeff just doesn’t have that bone. He is a great sax player but I get tired quickly of what he does in songs and I never felt that way about roi.
This is when people say how great Jeff’s solo albums are. Yeah well that’s his music not Dave’s. He just doesn’t mesh as well with Dave as his own music.
Just my opinion.
|
I think he's feeling the need to entertain people at a big rock show. I for one loved the extra energy when he was first part of the band. I thought he brought a ton of fun to the songs.
And yes 15 years on he and RR have evolved/devolved a number of times and changed their approach.
Songs like Lying in the Hands of God to me is a good example of what you're speaking of. I love that song, but the "jam" at the end isn't really creative or exciting. Jeff kind of gets in theses ruts where all his solo runs start sounding really similar and lead to this huge blow out at the end. He does this on Grey Street, Seek Up, Raven, etc... Again, I think he is approaching this as needing to entertain, and Dave has approved it or RR or the fans applause. It more or less works. Just one example. It's not bad, it's just not really worthy of chewing on for repeat listens like some of Roi's jams are.
Posthumously, Roi was a subtle genius. He was like Jerry Garcia in that he wasn't really trying to perform or entertain, but explore and create in real time. He'd really get into the heart of the song and that could change on any given night. If he wasn't feeling it, we all knew.
And the interplay with Boyd, especially in the early days, was integral to the unique sound of the band. As they got bigger and played bigger venues even in the early 2000's this started to drop off. It's the biggest thing missing in my opinion from the original band to now.
But I am trying to not compare 32 year old DMB to 7 year old DMB. I really like them right now still, and think they are a top notch live act. They do not compare to what they used to be in anyway. When they attempt that, it comes off as nostalgia or almost sounds like they are covering themselves. I think Dave is highly aware of that and a reason he doesn't want the fiddle back.
Getting more than 40 to 50 regular songs a tour isn't going to happen anymore if it ever did. But you can see them 2 or 3 nights in a row and get that amount of different shows. However, if you see them the next weekend, you're going to get the same thing.