Quote:
Originally Posted by TMoore4075
Remember the Lightning are doing it without Stamkos and Stralman. Helps when you have a very good 9 foot goalie. Still remember people in here thinking Yzerman was dumb for trading Cory Conacher for him. How's that looking now?
I think this all but solidifies Stammer leaving. Why would you want to commit $10ish mil per year for 8 years when you are going to the ECF's without him and will have plenty of guys to sign soon enough?
|
Conacher was an exciting prospect but you can't beat having a solid goalie, and that was in the midst of the Dwayne Roloson/Mike Smith replacement situation. Andres lindback was in there for a while. And Mathieu Garon as well. With the depth of the prospects at the time i didn't think it was an egregious move. Bishop is a stud in net, I really think he deserves the Vezina this year. I've learned not to question anything Yzerman does, guy knows what he's doing.
And I think you're right about Stamkos. I'll be really disappointed to see him go but money and cap wise if they can't reach a deal I get why. Hedman, Kucherov, Johnson, Palat will all have expiring deals in the next two seasons and all need to get locked up.
One thing though with all the talk about how these big time stars may want to go to Toronto once they are UFAs, Stamkos (this year) and Tavaras (2017) the two big ones that I've heard rumored, is that the combined federal and providential tax rates in Toronto add up to over 50%, are these guys willing to leave that much money on the table just to go play for the Leafs?
Idk, maybe I'm biased and still trying to cling to hope Stamkos wants to stay with Tampa, a team and community that he's really been embraced by and adores him, beautiful weather, no state taxes, championship opportunity and roster for the foreseeable short term future, but what is the benefit of going to TOR? Just because it's "home"? Am I underestimating/appreciating how "important" Toronto is to the greater hockey world?