Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
I'm late as usual to this, but the issue that the pro m4a people seem to be overlooking and taking as an attack is the very pertinent point that if your argument is x% of Dems support m4a, the counter to that should be "then why didn't the candidates espousing m4a win the nomination?"
It's not an attack. It's a question that suggests in its wondering that voters either didn't care that much about m4a, or that they cared more about nominating someone who they felt could beat Trump. It's that simple.
I'd like to get insurance untangled from one's employment, but not at the expense of an actual victory in November. Moral victories mean nothing to me in 2020. That's me making a choice for pragmatism. Obviously some of the posters itt are well past that concept, and that's fine. But anyone criticizing or questioning a purity stance versus a pragmatic stance isn't a bully or a troll.
__________________
"Stink isn't his user name, it was a nickname that is apparently not appreciated."
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrock25
Jesus Christ justink just shut the fuck up for once. Why does everything with you turn into an argument?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blaise34
CNN headline - Court gives baker narrow win in gay wedding cake case
7-2 is narrow now
|
Last edited by ThatLetter; 07-27-2020 at 07:14 PM.
|