Quote:
Originally Posted by but1well
I think about this idea a lot. Things, material, or achievements, or job titles are pretty hollow. It's fun pursuing them sometimes but ultimately the joy will wear off and you'll be looking for the next thing. I know you know this, but our kids are one of the few things in life where that rewarding feeling won't go away.
To cheesily quote the Great Gatsby, “All the bright precious things fade so fast, and they don't come back.”
|
Great response - sorry I missed this.
This is one of the places where I have internal debate about what it all means to have a family. Kids do eventually leave. If they are anything like my sibling and me, they move to different cities/states from their parents and rarely get to see/speak to them (my sister and I are far away from our parents - and I am far away from my sister). They get a career, marry, have family of their own and are involved in their own world. So after ~18 years, kids are gone. Once the kids leave, you are left with
your life (one, largely, filled without your kids). When that happens, and your kids are off chasing their dreams and their careers, where does that leave any of us as parents? To prepare for retirement and begin to wind everything down? Are our kids to follow the same path?
To me there has to be more than this cyclical work, procreate, and prepare our children for a life of the same. It severely lacks any of the "dreams" and "ambitions" that we often tout as wanting our kids to hold on to.
My boss (a physician) for example never turned off her career when they had kids, achieving new heights as life went on. Their kids left the nest - and when they did - my boss had their career in place to keep on shaking and baking. I guess this is partly where I had the notion that it was more feasible to balance personal and family life. For example, one of my "idols" is Siddhartha Mukherjee, who openly has a very busy professional life while also having two daughters. I don't expect anyone to read about them, but their wife is also very busy. For example, in a recent-ish story on Dr. Mukherjee, regarding his family and work:
"“I believe that work-life balance is overrated,” he says. “And I have none — zero.” It’s a way of life he shares with his wife, Sarah Sze, a prominent artist known for her large, intricate, and arresting sculptural installations. Sze and Mukherjee both keep irregular hours and travel constantly, she to exhibit her artwork and he to attend conferences. They carve out time each week to focus exclusively on their daughters, who are fifteen and eleven (museum trips and movie nights are always popular). But both parents work many evenings and weekends, Sze at her studio a few blocks from the family’s loft in Chelsea and Mukherjee at his CUIMC lab.
“We invite the girls to come along and even get involved sometimes, to be a part of it and enjoy it with us,” says Mukherjee. “We try to show them that it’s cool to be really passionate about your work — that it’s something we can all be proud of as a family.”
So I was of the mindset - if people can have a busy life with a family, then so can i. But I don't seem to be connecting with many in here regarding that sentiment.
Sorry for the long post! I think this sort of conversation is interesting.