|
Re: The NHL Thread
First mistake they've made all period and it fucking goes in
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Caps played so well. Though they lost they had many opportunities that just didn't fall. The first bouncing puck goal was a fluke.
Though they will come away with nothing in the standings from this game, the Caps still showed tonight that they can hang with the best in a 7 game series. I would love to play the Rags in the first round. Knowing the Caps ability to handle the Rangers in the playoffs makes me confident this team could make some moves come April. |
Re: The NHL Thread
Rangers are 1st in the MET!!! They also are head-to-head for the presidents trophy!! Another impressive win for this team!! Going back to back nights on the road against division rivals and getting two regulation wins! I am pumped!
Hopefully Klein is okay though. |
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
You are the only person I know that could take losing at home with a rested team against a team that had just played their biggest rival the night before and use that as proof the Caps could beat the Rangers in the playoffs. |
Re: The NHL Thread
:lol :lol
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
lol thinking Islanders are the biggest rival
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Re: The NHL Thread
It's certainly not the caps.
For the Rangers this season: Pens Isles Caps Flyers |
Re: The NHL Thread
The Icelanders will ALWAYS be the Rangers biggest rival. It is also funny to me that fans of other teams are trying to tell us who are rivals are....
|
Re: The NHL Thread
I'm honestly curious if Brohan is serious sometimes or has just become a troll of himself.
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
So overtime will be discussed next week at GM meetings. Data sure shows the AHL's games are going to shootouts a lot less. Both leagues have roughly the same amount of games going to OT at around 25% but 77% of AHL games end in OT, while only 44% of the NHL games are. I just have a feeling they won't be able to sell everyone on 3on3, so my guess is, OT is just elongated by a few minutes. I have to say I like the idea of penalties being only 1 minutes in OT. Sure keeping them 2 gives you a better shot of it ending at 4on3 but it's just such a large fraction of the OT that it doesn't make sense. It would be like penalties being 8 minutes long in regulation.
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
also, if they extend OT to 7 or 8 minute, or even 10, then they probably keep 2 minute penalties it also gives players more incentive to clutch & grab (which i hate) if the punishment is reduced to 1 minute |
Re: The NHL Thread
3 on 3 in the NHL would be so amazing
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Damn Leafs... Barely beat the Sabres. Just suck more! Lose to them!
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
i know i've been very vocal about this before, but i think it's perfectly fine the way it is now. what i would do/change: 1. keep the OT rules the way they are now 2. Widen/heighten the nets by an inch or 2 3. reduce goalies' pad sizes slightly 4. eliminate clutching and grabbing, especially in the neutral zone (and fucking enforce it!!!!) 5. have ALL games be worth the same amount of total points (aka no OT loser point) 6. contract the league down to 26-28 teams (i know. this will never happen) #4 is the big one for me...stars can't be stars right now because of all the obstruction that's allowed to go on. the league is over-saturated and over-coached |
Re: The NHL Thread
To #1: I just want OT to be 10 minutes. 4on4 is fine and exciting and I think it would help lessen shootouts.
#2: Was against it before but starting to wonder. I mean goalies in terms of their physical stature, are getting bigger. I mean if you're under 6 feet you are short now. #3: Which leads to this. Watching games 6 and 7 and the Campbell Conference Finals in 93 seeing Hrudey and Potvin and how small their pads were...amazing. Add bigger pads to bigger guys? There is almost no net to shoot at. This is what is coming next: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJz55az43QQ #4: That's been the problem for years. It's not consistent. One games they'll call everything and the next they call almost nothing. At least in the old days it was consistent. On the bad side of things mind you, but consistent. lol #5: Won't happen, especially with the shootout. The league wants to lessen them, already doesn't think they should figure into tie breakers, so to have a shootout win worth the same as a regulation win won't happen. I know the argument is teams will try harder to win it, but you can try all you want, sometimes it just happens. I mean Wings try not to go to a shootout (cause they suck at them) and it's still happened like 12 times. That's a lot of 1 points they wouldn't have gotten from a skills competition. I don't think this ever gets fixed. Before the "loser point" we had teams not doing anything in the 5 minutes of OT to not lose that point. It's here to stay. #6: Most of us agree with this but yeah won't happen. I actually think it's finally getting better in terms of talent to spread around for 30 teams and what's gonna happen? Expansion....sigh. I understand wanting to get as much money as possible but sometimes you just need to be happy with what you have. |
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
and you're probably right about #5, but man, it really irks me :lol it skews the standings pretty drastically IMO |
Re: The NHL Thread
It only skews the standings because we have shootouts that guarantee a team goes home with a win. So if you go past regulation we guarantee a 3 point night. In 1999-2000 it didn't skew things because you would sometime have ties. The system we have, if we try to lessen shootouts, is probably the best we'll get. The 3-2-1 point system will never happen because some people want 3 points for only regulation wins, but then you have OT and shootout wins worth the same which I don't think should happen and I don't think the NHL will either because the tiebreaker is ROTW so clearly they think a shootout isn't worth the same as OT. So adjust the OT format and keeping the point system is what is going to happen.
Actually the only way I see to make it fair across the board is no OT point and just do continuous OT. No skills competition and no one can play for the tie to keep a point. BUT I don't think that should happen or will happen. I don't want it to because I like the continuous OT is saved for the playoffs plus the NHL won't want a game in November going until 1am and the PA won't sign off on that because of the extra time. I'm curious as to what comes out of the meetings because it'll be something. |
Re: The NHL Thread
i just think it should move back to 2 pts for a win and 0 pts for a loss
keep everything else the same i get that the shootout is a skills competition and teams shouldn't "lose" points because of it (even though they already do, technically) but if it's a part of the game it's on the coaches to practice it and get better if need be |
Re: The NHL Thread
B's/TB should be a great game tonight.
going to the st patty's day game against buffalo. can't wait, always a good time on st pattys day in boston |
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Sounds like Boychuk resigned for 7 days. Seems like 2 years too many and probably for too much money. Will be curious what the $$$ are. Maybe they did an extra year or 2 to keep average yearly salary below JT.
Just heard. 42 million. Too much but expected. Might get more or same on open market. |
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
Sounds like what the Yankees pay ARod. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:14 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.14
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All trademarks and copyrights are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest is owned by antsmarching.org.