|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
Bout time for Pat! |
Re: The NHL Thread
Kekalainen on Hartnell: "He said ’I’m 32 years old. I have plenty of money. What I want to do more than anything now is win."
— Aaron Portzline (Aportzline) |
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Well Brayden Schenn got an extension, not sure money details yet
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
This is an awesome video: http://video.kings.nhl.com/videocent...822&catid=1327
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Alfie back for one more year and most likely back with Detroit.
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
How Eric Lindros is not in the HHoF is mind boggling.
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Very happy with the move. RJ is more versatile and will be able to be a contributor to the team for the length of this contract.
Hartnell's best quality is that he is good to have in the locker room. Not sure if spending 4.75 million for the next 5 years on a "glue guy" is the best allocation of said funds. Hartnell's best days are behind him. As he gets older and slower(!), he really won't have a roll on a team other than a PP "specialist" (and I use that term loosely). RJ is getting overpaid with that contract but at least he can add something to the team when he isn't putting up points (which cannot be said about Hartnell). At the end of the day, Hartnell and Vinny's contracts were huge albatrosses for the Flyers. Impossible for them to be serious contenders when 9.25 million/year is being eaten up by two stiffs. Now Hexy just needs to find a sucker for Vinny's contract...... |
Re: The NHL Thread
Cannot wait for Zilla melt on acquiring Umberger.
|
Re: The NHL Thread
He doesn't know what hockey is anymore
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Calle Johannson leaves Caps for "personal reasons". More like "because he's a shit defensive coach"
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
He was the best player in the 90's outside of Jagr. |
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
As a 7-time all-star and Hart winner, Lindros is right there. And while he was injured an awful lot, I think his 865 points in 760 games is pretty indicative of excellence. Is the shortness of his playing career playing a part in all this? Perhaps. I know the "what ifs" surrounding Lindros's career can be both frustrating and heartbreaking. You know how I'm not big on "just" stats though, so I will say that when Lindros was on and skating with his head up, the list of more dominant peers in the NHL at the time was very small. I compare his situation a lot to Forsberg's in terms of shortness of career and "what ifs". Lindros played 13 seasons (if I'm counting correctly) compared to Forsberg's 14 (15 if you count the couple games he played for the Avs in 2011). Forsberg finished with 885 points in 708 games, 7-time all star (like Lindros), a Calder, an Art Ross, a Hart, and two Stanley Cups. Similar stats, a bit more hardware. Getting away from stats, I don't know if there was a more complete player than Forsberg when he was in his prime. I think Lindros could make it in eventually. I'm sure this is very cynical of me, but I'm starting to gauge HHOF worthiness on the "Cicarelli Scale"... In other words, are they better than him? If so, let 'em in! |
Re: The NHL Thread
I thought comparing him to Peter but yeah Peter has more hardware on every level. Hell, he won the scoring race in the 2002 playoffs and only played the first 3 rounds...Guess he was making up for missing the last 2 rounds in 2001.
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
As for Lindros, that's a bit of a tough one. Like Matty said, when he was 100% and playing to his potential, he was easily one of the most dominate and effective players of his time. But he didn't really win much. Not that guys haven't gotten into the Hall without winning much, because they have. However, it's hard to argue with 865 points in 760 games. That's impressive. The Forsberg comparison is okay, but Peter won a lot of important hardware. I would easily put Forsberg in the HOF before Lindros, but I think eventually he should get in too. That stat line combined with the eye test is enough for me. There's no denying he was one of the best true power forwards to ever hit the ice. He should get in, IMO. |
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
Again, I use the Cicarelli rule a lot... Not a huge knock on the guy, but if I were to take all the HHOF guys and rank them, I think Dino would be at or near the bottom. It's pretty easy at that point to make a call... are they as good or better than Dino? I do think Lindros gets in. |
Re: The NHL Thread
Yeah the Cicarelli rule is a good one. Still a little puzzled as to why he's even there, and he might even be in as a Capital. Though I think he's in as a North Star
|
Re: The NHL Thread
And for the record, Peter Forsberg is a first ballot Hall of Famer. No question about it
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Well, I guess this settles it: ;)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
OMG I really hope O'Reilly wins the Byng tonight.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:13 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.14
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All trademarks and copyrights are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest is owned by antsmarching.org.