![]() |
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Quote:
I didnt even see a call made on the ice, thats what was ridiculous to me. It seemed like no ref had an idea so it just defaulted to no goal because there wasnt a definite call. Not surprising nothing for Wilson, #garageleague at its best. I cant see an argument for there at least not being a hearing. I dont expect Dumo to play again this season, that looked like a brutal concussion. Mightve been knocked out on the ice. Cant overstate how huge a loss he is. |
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Quote:
Asfor the no-goal, I thought the NBC close-up showed a sliver of white ice between the puck and the goal line. And it appeared to sneak by Holtby’s pad behind the post, which logically puts it behind the line. Sid claims he saw the puck on edge behind the post. But, the call on the ice was no goal, and given that we are going into frame-by-frame analysis, I can accept that there was not enough to overturn. The reffing was atrocious all around. They miss some calls against the Caps, so they let Ruwhedel get away with a blatant trip/slash on Smith-Pelley. Then tempers flare and everyone gets chippy. That shouldn’t happen. |
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Refs completely lost control of that game yesterday, it was shit show all around.
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Quote:
https://twitter.com/NHLPlayerSafety/...48106647244800 - rules are rules but you can ignore To reiterate, I think the head needs to be treated like high sticking & whatever the call on the ice was I think needed to stay the call. https://twitter.com/HeyBarber/status/990713918040375296 Every overhead angle never showed puck crossing the line. Once puck gets lost the play gets blown dead. Those are rules. Hard to follow & agree with rules eh? |
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
1. Im not even saying wilson shouldve got a game, based on his history it shouldve been a hearing
2. Show me the rule that says you HAVE to see a conclusive OVERHEAD view. And again as I said if you watch the whole sequence from that angle, you can clearly see the puck is on recoil from the still image used. |
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Officiating seems to be terrible through out every series in this second round
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Wilson’s hit was fine. The Pittsburgh player was Ovie a bout to clean his clock and turned back into Wilson trying to avoit it. Tough play but it was brutal out there.
I guess instant reply can’t solve everything. We should put a microchip in the puck or something if we want these calls to be right. I thought the Pens lost control, not the refs. Two bad minors in the 3rd out of frustration didn’t help their comeback chances. Then when it was over, they were clearly just trying to set the tone for game 3. It’s just getting started. And I think a streetfight plays into the Caps favor since Pittsburgh is nicked. And Hornqvist is a pussy. He’s a good enough player but wants no part of Tim Wilson or Smith-Pelly. |
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Quote:
No where here was it ever conclusive it was in by any stretch - show me where it's over conclusively? Goal was waived off right away |
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Dumo skating in a non contact jersey. I am stunned.
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Quote:
You thought two stupid penalties in the third was a good idea? That’s usually what Washington does. |
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
How does one post the YouTube link of the NBC broadcast that I assume contained the still shot of (in this order) goal line, sliver of white, puck in support of the argument there is no conclusive evidence of a goal?
Not that it matters, the Pens would have still been down a goal anyway. Also, would C2S mind explaining what exactly, “wanting no parts of Tim [sic] Wilson or Smith-Pelly” actually means and how that defines Hornqvist a pussy? |
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
I thought it would be called a goal.
I have disagreed with most of the reviews this payoffs though. |
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Quote:
Anyway... I didn’t view the hornqvist Orlov thing that way, but ok. Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Even in games, scoring the periods so far I have it 3-2 and a tie with the Caps up one period (in the game they lost of course).
Definitely feels like a 7 game series. |
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Quote:
Crosby even said he saw the puck behind the post. *waits for lol guys from caps fans* - but he isnt going to just come out and say that if he didnt see it. |
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
EDIT: and it would be more excusable and less infuriating if they blew the play dead before the puck went in; at least IMO. The fact they took all of that time to review it and still waived it off is mind boggling. But, like I said, it wouldn’t have mattered. With that said, use replay and get it right. |
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Quote:
Yeah, it looks like you can see white. |
Re: The NHL Thread (Hot takes! 3elieve!)
Quote:
Maybe they rushed the decision before they waited for that proper angle and zoom to come across. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All trademarks and copyrights are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest is owned by antsmarching.org.