Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
Quote:
Please tell me he'll be gone from NBC and VS. PLEASE!!! And hope Maguire was standing awkwardly close to the kid too so he can be fired also. |
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Thinking about the Pronger situation, im not so sure it is a bad thing. Sure they lose him, but they're playing amazingly without him, they put him on ltir and have that extra space to work with and can go out and get a piece or two. Imo, the Flyers are one of the most dangerous teams and as of now, as much as i hate to say it, i have them making the finals and winning.
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Really enjoyed the first episode of 24/7. Great series.
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
How many of you watched the first episode of 24/7. Best sports doc. I have ever seen
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
I don't think anyone matches up well with the Bruins. That team is stacked and they have the best goaltending duo in the NHL. |
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quit giving me hope, damn it!
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
I remember when I picked Florida to make the playoffs and almost got laughed out of the thread.
Anywho, it's Pittsburgh, Philly, or Boston in the East with the Rangers being a darkhorse and Chicago, Detroit, or Minnesota in the West, and I'm not even that sold on Minnesota. |
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
And unless the Hawks get their defense under control, I wouldn't consider them a legitimate threat to win the Cup. |
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Only legit threats in the West are Chicago, Detroit, Van, and SJ with St. Louis as a possible darkhorse. Although I think the Cup comes out of the East this year barring Hawks adding a solid d-man and a competent scoring winger or center.
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Florida is relying way too much on its first line. They don't have much scoring besides on the top line. If they make the playoffs I'll be surprised.
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
I still think the Kings have too much talent to be overlooked. They have to get it together at some point, right?
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
You're right about Florida; their top line of Weiss, Fleischmann, and Versteeg account for 47% of all their team's goals. Some others I checked on, in comparison (going mostly by thread popularity) Chicago (Toews, Sharp, Hossa... this one's hard to pin down a top line because of all the shuffling): 45% Philadelphia (Giroux, Hartnell, Jagr): 37% Boston (Lucic, Horton, Krejci): 23% - Boston actually has a little more scoring from their "second" line of Seguin, Marchand, and Bergeron, who account for 29% of the team's goals. |
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
Florida = No Toews Moral of Story = It doesn't matter and the top two lines are Kane-Toews-Stalberg and Sharp-Kruger-Hossa. I don't other teams 3rd and 4th lines are really outscoring the Hawks by much |
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
fuck, I sound like I'm raging. I just came back from the gym, must be the endorphins. Jesus...
*slams metal chair in the back of Matty, then pins him* |
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
No one agrees with me about LA? Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiit.
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.14
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All trademarks and copyrights are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest is owned by antsmarching.org.