fonzz41 |
03-31-2014 01:39 PM |
Re: The NHL 2013-14 Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by lockman21
(Post 15229287)
The Blackhawks have, while under Q, always been a VERY streaky team. You all saw it last year at it's best when they came out of the gates at full speed, but every year has extreme ups and downs. That kind of comes with a puck possession team like the Hawks. When it goes wrong, it goes very wrong. Not to make excuses, but it's even worse when they lose 88...then toss in losing 19 too?
I would argue that Kane is the most important member of the Chicago Blackhawks for multiple reasons, but one is his ability to move the puck through the neutral zone and sustain pressure in the offensive zone. Whenever he's on the ice, the Hawks pull back and try to make sure he's the one with his stick on the puck leaving the defensive zone. They play a different brand of hockey when he's gone. He's been very, very healthy over his career, and rarely ever misses time, so we don't see it often, but when we do, it's rough. It's a lot less of the north and south team most people know the Hawks as, and a lot more of a grind-it-out type team. They just all look lost out there right now.
This team has been incredibly lucky with injuries the past couple years. 88 has played almost every game since he came into the league, 19 only really missed time one season, Keith has played in almost every game (besides suspensions) since he came in the league...etc. etc. I know injuries are a poor excuse, but right now, that's the issue. I think the Blackhawks lean harder on the shoulders of 19 and 88 than any other team leans on their stars (aside from maybe Pitt and Crosby).
The other rare occasions can just be chalked up to a random down Q night. Overall I believe this is the best blue line in the NHL led by the best defenseman in the league, and 99% of the time you see that. Keith should be as close to a unanimous Norris winner as we've had since Lidstrom, Seabrook has been good (certainly not great, but he's been a lot better than most give him credit for), Hjalmarrson is a rock 99 out of 100 shifts, etc. They're also a lot better against teams like the Blues or the Kings than they are against teams like the Avs. Hell, their biggest problem team was the Oilers for years. For some reason, the quick, young teams are the best answer for the Chicago Blackhawks. I've been saying it all year, but Colorado is the absolute worst matchup for the Hawks in the first round of the playoffs.
|
Totally agree. I'm fully on board with Keith getting the Norris this year, just interesting some of the breakdowns I've seen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bron Yr Aur
(Post 15229309)
Obviously next few games will be tough without Kane AND Toews. But over the recent stretch, the Hawks have just been a little lazy probably. Like Matty said, the D like to get active in the offensive zone and if the forwards don't quite get back to help quick enough or if the d-men make a bad pinch or two, you might have an odd-man rush the other way, and lately other teams are just scoring every time on these.
If you look at the rest of the numbers, the possession has still been strongly in favor of the Hawks in many of these games that they have lost.
Colorado will be a tough matchup because they have a bigger home ice advantage than most teams IMO. The elevation in Denver is something they are used to. Will be tough for the Hawks. That said, on the ice the Hawks have been doubling the Avs in shots in just about every match-up this year. It's just really tough to believe that Colorado can win a series playing in their own end so much.
|
This is the case with just about every upper-echelon team, and believe me, it bugs me to no end. The Sharks put up 50 on them the other night.
But I'm telling you guys, that's where you're getting it wrong. Varlamov thrives when he has to keep working and is forced to stay in his groove. I don't have the exact numbers in front of me, but a graphic on the game the other night showed he's below .500 (I think 8-10) when facing 29 shots or less, but something like 11-1 when facing 40+.
The key to Varly? Shoot when it matters. Don't let him make the easy save and get into a groove. The Sharks were taking any shot they could, and they couldn't solve him.
I still contend and harbor no illusions that the Hawks have the advantage in the first round, even if the Avs hold on to home ice. Even so, I'm cautiously optimistic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMoore4075
(Post 15229246)
Duchesne out 4 weeks. That's basically the first round so that's a huge loss.
|
This hurts so so so so so so bad. I'm grateful we've already got the playoff spot locked up, but as we've talked about how the Avs can beat the Hawks with speed, you can see why his loss hurts. Like I've said before, MacKinnon is probably faster in terms of north-south, putting-your-head-down-and-skating speed, but Duchene's quickness and agility at getting out of tight spaces is so valuable.
Chris mentioned Kane and how he takes pressure off the rest of the team by drawing defenders to him. Duchene does the same thing, and his secret is out... I've seen guys start to give him cushions - they hold off taking the body because they think they'll get beat. You give a guy like Duchene a cushion though, and you'll be watching his celly not long after.
|