|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
Staal helped them win a Cup so im not sure how you can say the Pens "botched" that pick Hawks have just done a better job building a deep team since then |
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
Hank gives up one goal on the road, and the home fans are on him instantly. They also boo him like crazing when the starting lineups are announced. For Mason or Schneider or Halak, they need to give up 2-3 before they start hearing it from the MSG fans or whatever home fans they play on the road...if they even hear anything at all. You named Holtby and Fleury as your examples, which actually proves the point I was making. Both are or have been elite goalies at some point in their career and are expected to be major parts of their team. The point I was making to start the day was that the great players get the most shit from away fans because they earned it. Is anyone in here really arguing that Hank has not been one of, if not the best goalie in the league of the last 10-12 years? Or more importantly, is anyone really arguing that he is not 100% the Rangers most important player??? |
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
no one is arguing Hank's credentials or importance
but its just a fact that, especially nearing playoff time, any goalie with a 2 syllable name gets taunted when he is having a rough night or gives up a softy no need to be in an arena to know this. TV is just fine |
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
Toewes is fantastic, obviously. But I agree with H2P in that it is hard to say the Pens botched the pick given that Staal was integral in helping them win a Cup. Also, the Pens ended up with two superstar centers, so one of them would likely be gone by now had they drafted Toewes. What it comes down to is that the Hawks have done a much better job of putting supporting talent around their superstars. That's why I have to envy the Hawks to an extent. The Hawks and the Pens are similar in the sense that they both sucked hard during the early 2000's and ended up with killer draft picks to build around. The Hawks, clearly, have done a better job of turning that windfall into Stanley Cups. |
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
funny how everyone thought the Pens and Hawks would meet multiple times in the Cup finals, yet its still never happened even with 5 appearances between them would be such a fun series |
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
i don't see the Pens beating the Rangers without Malkin though |
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
Man, I wished I just used Kane, Ovi or Nash as my example for my point earlier. Clearly it would have made it easier to understand. I just picked the best player on my team naturally who happens to be a goalie.... |
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
That said, I think the Pens this year could beat us even without him. I would still favor my team, but I am more worried about the Pens this year than I was last year. |
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
I agree, with Malkin I think the matchup would be a toss up. The Pens are playing great hockey, and part of me wonders what NYR team will be in the playoffs. They seem to always turn it on come post season and if that happens I would favor the Rangers with or without Malkin (although with would make it harder). That said, the Rangers have had three long runs in 4 years and I am still kind of expecting a let down this year due to fatigue. That could make this a juicy first round matchup for Pitt. |
Re: The NHL Thread
As the Pens are on a tear without Malkin, winning many key games, some of them handily, I'm going to say the Pens are dangerous even without Malkin. They will need him back to go deep into the Playoffs, but I am feeling better about their chances against the Rags even without Malkin.
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
1. goaltending--if Fleury or Hank are not on top of their games, it's series over 2. pace of play--if the Pens can speed up the Rangers and play a fast game, the Rags won't be able to keep up. i haven't seen a team in the east that can skate with the Pens...on the other hand, the the Rags can play heavy and wear down the Pens' undersized blue line on the forecheck, it give NYR a distinct advantage 3. special teams (self-explanatory)--and this is where Malkin really comes into play |
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
So true on them never meeting in a final, I thought it was going to happen in 2009 to be honest but Detroit won 4-1 during the western conference finals - in a closer series than the stats show since 3 games out of the 5 went to OT. |
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
EVERY game that the Pens lost, the score was 2-1 Rangers :lol Fleury did his part for sure, which gives me hope for this year |
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
Rangers win all of their playoff games 1-0, 2-1, 3-2. Gives me a heart attack every time. Either this team is really good at winning close games, or they are the luckiest team in NHL history. |
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
Fortunately, Holmgren made up for it at the trade deadline and free agency and did a very nice job creating a core that made the Conference Finals two out of the next four years. |
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwxTrxESWjI |
Re: The NHL Thread
Quote:
Edit: Can you imagine Tim Murray as the GM of the Flyers? He was pissed when he lost the lottery to the 3rd worst team and got Jack Eichel. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:57 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.14
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All trademarks and copyrights are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest is owned by antsmarching.org.