Antsmarching.org Forums - Dave Matthews Band Discussion

Antsmarching.org Forums - Dave Matthews Band Discussion (https://www.antsmarching.org/forum/index.php)
-   The Tailgate (https://www.antsmarching.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=93)
-   -   The NHL Thread (https://www.antsmarching.org/forum/showthread.php?t=324692)

Roose13 06-11-2017 08:15 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters!)
 
Congrats to the Kansas City Penguins on their third Cup.

DMBzilla 06-11-2017 08:17 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dramageek (Post 16812230)
He blew the whistle. Was he in a shitty position? Sure, but he blew the whistle. Nashville also apparently committed zero penalties. Nothing's tainted.

I'm done with that now and am enjoying the hell out of this!!

It was a horrible whistle. That's the fucking point.

Huge asterisk on this one. That goal counts and they're playing Wednesday.

Dramageek 06-11-2017 08:19 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Roose13 (Post 16812236)
Congrats to the Kansas City Penguins on their third Cup.

I believe you mean Hamilton, Ontario Penguins.

daveshookme 06-11-2017 08:19 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters!)
 
That little giggle from Daley was awesome.

Brohan_Santana 06-11-2017 08:21 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters!)
 
Glad Richard and Howe won't have to share their name with bitch ass Crosby

Lcsulla 06-11-2017 08:27 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DMBzilla (Post 16812237)
It was a horrible whistle. That's the fucking point.

Huge asterisk on this one. That goal counts and they're playing Wednesday.

He lost sight of the puck and thought Murray had it so he blew the whistle - it is what refs are instructed to do. Plus, it was that jerk sissions who put it in so karma is a bitch after his cheapshot on Maata in game 5. Additionally the refs knew it was a quick whistle so they gave a REALLY soft penalty to Sheary and then ignored clear cut penalties by rinne, sissions and ellis.

Regardless, congrats to pittsburgh fans - very happy you all beat those dirtbags even if it ties Crosby and Toews for cup wins.

No clue why the Conn Smyth was given to Crosby to be honest - my short list would have been Malkin, Guentzel and Murray.

Last thing - what a dumb ass penalty Daley took to make it a 5 on 3, luckily it did not cost the pens.

LATER TRASHVILLE - see you next season, take your catfishes and shove them up your asses! Way to go Pens, well earned victory, truthfully I have no idea how they advanced over the Jackets and the Caps given all their injuries and banged up players. To the preds, you all just got hot at the right time - the last team to qualify for the postseason goes to the final (aided by a lot of calls going their way) but got a big smackdown against a better team finally! :multi

bradshaw06 06-11-2017 08:28 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Watching from a bar in mexico. That was so stressful.

daveshookme 06-11-2017 08:29 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Crosby for CS is a little fucking strange. Murray would have been a great choice.

JRS1386 06-11-2017 08:30 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lcsulla (Post 16812244)
He lost sight of the puck and thought Murray had it so he blew the whistle - it is what refs are instructed to do. Plus, it was that jerk sissions who put it in so karma is a bitch after his cheapshot on Maata in game 5. Additionally the refs knew it was a quick whistle so they gave a REALLY soft penalty to Sheary and then ignored clear cut penalties by rinne, sissions and ellis.

Regardless, congrats to pittsburgh fans - very happy you all beat those dirtbags even if it ties Crosby and Toews for cup wins.

No clue why the Conn Smyth was given to Crosby to be honest - my short list would have been Malkin, Guentzel and Murray.

Last thing - what a dumb ass penalty Daley took to make it a 5 on 3, luckily it did not cost the pens.

LATER TRASHVILLE - see you next season, take your catfishes and shove them up your asses! Way to go Pens, well earned victory, truthfully I have no idea how they advanced over the Jackets and the Caps given all their injuries and banged up players. To the preds, you all just got hot at the right time - the last team to qualify for the postseason goes to the final (aided by a lot of calls going their way) but got a big smackdown against a better team finally! :multi

Someone is still bitter from that sweep. Its ok, you had just as many wins as the Flyers this postseason

DMBzilla 06-11-2017 08:30 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
^ Yes, I know why he blew the whistle. I also know he had a horrible angle, and simply had to wait half a second until he was behind the line and he would've seen the puck was never close to covered.

Awful call decided the series. Awful.

Lcsulla 06-11-2017 08:32 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BotheU2Fan (Post 16812193)
Tie game boys!

Oh wait...

I thought they should have challenged that for offsides, not goalie interference. Stupid choice by Laviolette because that could have been called back for a possible offsides IMO - at least from the angles I saw but challenging on interference had no chance on getting that one called back.

Sorry Laviolette, that is twice in 7 years your team got beat by a better team - last time in 2010 the Hawks beat the Flyers down and now this. TS buddy! :lol

Brohan_Santana 06-11-2017 08:33 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
#NotOurChampAMNhlThread2017

Lcsulla 06-11-2017 08:35 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DMBzilla (Post 16812253)
^ Yes, I know why he blew the whistle. I also know he had a horrible angle, and simply had to wait half a second until he was behind the line and he would've seen the puck was never close to covered.

Awful call decided the series. Awful.

It was the right call from the angle he had though, as for it deciding the series, even if it counted the Pens had more than enough time to tie it up or ho ahead - not to mention even if it did decide THIS game there would still have been a game 7 in Pittsburgh. So yeah, that certainly did not decide the series by any means.

Lcsulla 06-11-2017 08:35 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Brohan_Santana (Post 16812256)
#NotOurChampAMNhlThread2017

At this point you are trolling, cool it man.

Brohan_Santana 06-11-2017 08:35 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lcsulla (Post 16812255)
I thought they should have challenged that for offsides, not goalie interference. Stupid choice by Laviolette because that could have been called back for a possible offsides IMO - at least from the angles I saw but challenging on interference had no chance on getting that one called back.

Sorry Laviolette, that is twice in 7 years your team got beat by a better team - last time in 2010 the Hawks beat the Flyers down and now this. TS buddy! :lol

It was the 8 seed bro. Hawks got sweeper by the 8 seed, so Hawks fans can STFU

Brohan_Santana 06-11-2017 08:36 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lcsulla (Post 16812258)
At this point you are trolling, cool it man.

It was a joke bud. Chill out

Lcsulla 06-11-2017 08:36 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Brohan_Santana (Post 16812259)
It was the 8 seed bro. Hawks got sweeper by the 8 seed, so Hawks fans can STFU

Later dude, see you in a week troll.

bradshaw06 06-11-2017 08:40 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Its all Murrays fault.

DMBzilla 06-11-2017 08:44 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lcsulla (Post 16812257)
It was the right call from the angle he had though, as for it deciding the series, even if it counted the Pens had more than enough time to tie it up or ho ahead - not to mention even if it did decide THIS game there would still have been a game 7 in Pittsburgh. So yeah, that certainly did not decide the series by any means.

There are two refs on the ice. Give it a second and get the call right.

As for it deciding the game, did you watch it?? Zero chance Pittsburgh was scoring with how well Rinne was playing, especially if he had a 1-0 lead. The call decided the game tonight which negated the chance for a game 7. Thus it decided the series.

Awful, awful call. Period.

bradshaw06 06-11-2017 08:44 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lcsulla (Post 16812257)
It was the right call from the angle he had though, as for it deciding the series, even if it counted the Pens had more than enough time to tie it up or ho ahead - not to mention even if it did decide THIS game there would still have been a game 7 in Pittsburgh. So yeah, that certainly did not decide the series by any means.

Preds had a ton of chances to get it back. Had 5on 3, didnt have to pk.

thechad90000 06-11-2017 09:02 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Tough to lose in such a bullshit way. I loved how well this team played all year. I knew there was something special about them even throughout the regular season and they really shined and showed how good they really were. Congrats to the Pens. I now officially hate your team but luck didn't win you games 2 and 5 so we had our chance. Lsculla FUCK YOU and FUCK THE HAWKS.

Dramageek 06-11-2017 09:05 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lcsulla (Post 16812261)
Later dude, see you in a week troll.

Brohan' sheer hatred for the Pens severely outshines his love for the Caps. It fascinates me.

Dramageek 06-11-2017 09:09 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thechad90000 (Post 16812275)
Tough to lose in such a bullshit way. I loved how well this team played all year. I knew there was something special about them even throughout the regular season and they really shined and showed how good they really were. Congrats to the Pens. I now officially hate your team but luck didn't win you games 2 and 5 so we had our chance. Lsculla FUCK YOU and FUCK THE HAWKS.

The Preds did have their chances to get it back. Murray's save on the breakaway and that one that tipped off his glove were huge. Preds PP was kind of garbage. They're a fun young team. I have a feeling they'll get another chance.

Dramageek 06-11-2017 09:10 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DMBzilla (Post 16812264)
There are two refs on the ice. Give it a second and get the call right.

As for it deciding the game, did you watch it?? Zero chance Pittsburgh was scoring with how well Rinne was playing, especially if he had a 1-0 lead. The call decided the game tonight which negated the chance for a game 7. Thus it decided the series.

Awful, awful call. Period.

If the ref loses sight of the puck, there's no giving it a second. It sucks when something like that happens, but it wasn't illegal or nefarious.

dmbetc 06-11-2017 09:11 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Miss you Chad, sorry about the lose

JRS1386 06-11-2017 09:12 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
At least Brohan got banned, that's one good that came out of this

thedak 06-11-2017 09:15 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lcsulla (Post 16812261)
Later dude, see you in a week troll.

God Bless

thechad90000 06-11-2017 09:16 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dmbetc (Post 16812281)
Miss you Chad, sorry about the lose

Sarah! Yeah it was a tough one but what can ya do.

thechad90000 06-11-2017 09:18 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dramageek (Post 16812278)
The Preds did have their chances to get it back. Murray's save on the breakaway and that one that tipped off his glove were huge. Preds PP was kind of garbage. They're a fun young team. I have a feeling they'll get another chance.

They had their chances. I'll probably never let that goal go though. Gonna be bitter for years whether they had chances or not. Still, Pens won so that's that.

Their seeding this year was definitely deceiving. Those of us that followed the season know the injuries and the 3v3 OT were the only things keeping us from being higher. I think the future is indeed very bright.

hailtopitt 06-11-2017 09:21 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Lol all the whining in here

Pens are better than Nashville, and that's no knock on Nashville


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

daveshookme 06-11-2017 09:24 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Let's be real, even if they made the correct call they still would have had to play more than half the game without giving up a goal, and then go into Pittsburgh and win.

Not saying it couldn't have happened but fuck, it would have been difficult.

bradshaw06 06-11-2017 09:30 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Sid in the last calendar year
Cup
Conn Smythe
World Cup Gold
World Cup MVP
1000'th point
Hart Nominee
Rocket Richard
Another Cup
Conn Smythe

thechad90000 06-11-2017 09:39 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by daveshookme (Post 16812289)
Let's be real, even if they made the correct call they still would have had to play more than half the game without giving up a goal, and then go into Pittsburgh and win.

Not saying it couldn't have happened but fuck, it would have been difficult.

No doubt it would have been difficult. Game would have been 1-0 with 1:30 left instead of 0-0. Pens would have had an empty net. Then yes, the Preds would have had to win in Pitt. But given the overturned goal in 1 (which was disputable) this one stung even more.

DMBzilla 06-11-2017 10:15 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
"They had other chances to score" is such a bullshit argument. Both teams had chances all game. The ref blew the call when it mattered and it cost Nashville the game, and series, period. To lose that way is horrible.

cry_minarets458 06-11-2017 10:17 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
I had the game on in the office streaming but really didn't pay close attention. I hopefully can watch it tomorrow somehow

dmb9howell 06-11-2017 11:12 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Crosby's so good

barbogast 06-12-2017 02:31 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lcsulla (Post 16812244)
He lost sight of the puck and thought Murray had it so he blew the whistle - it is what refs are instructed to do. Plus, it was that jerk sissions who put it in so karma is a bitch after his cheapshot on Maata in game 5. Additionally the refs knew it was a quick whistle so they gave a REALLY soft penalty to Sheary and then ignored clear cut penalties by rinne, sissions and ellis.

Regardless, congrats to pittsburgh fans - very happy you all beat those dirtbags even if it ties Crosby and Toews for cup wins.

No clue why the Conn Smyth was given to Crosby to be honest - my short list would have been Malkin, Guentzel and Murray.

Last thing - what a dumb ass penalty Daley took to make it a 5 on 3, luckily it did not cost the pens.

LATER TRASHVILLE - see you next season, take your catfishes and shove them up your asses! Way to go Pens, well earned victory, truthfully I have no idea how they advanced over the Jackets and the Caps given all their injuries and banged up players. To the preds, you all just got hot at the right time - the last team to qualify for the postseason goes to the final (aided by a lot of calls going their way) but got a big smackdown against a better team finally! :multi

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lcsulla (Post 16812257)
It was the right call from the angle he had though, as for it deciding the series, even if it counted the Pens had more than enough time to tie it up or ho ahead - not to mention even if it did decide THIS game there would still have been a game 7 in Pittsburgh. So yeah, that certainly did not decide the series by any means.

I can't believe you, of all people, are defending the refs right now. Unreal.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRS1386 (Post 16812283)
At least Brohan got banned, that's one good that came out of this

Brohan's ban was not deserved.

thechad90000 06-12-2017 03:18 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dmb9howell (Post 16812312)
Crosby's so good

So good that they just give him the Conn Smyth based on name alone!

JRS1386 06-12-2017 03:47 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by barbogast (Post 16812316)
I can't believe you, of all people, are defending the refs right now. Unreal.



Brohan's ban was not deserved.

Oh I know, but I'm not complaining.

salrx95 06-12-2017 04:01 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Congrats to the Pens fans in here and to Mark Streit.

The disallowed goal wasn't exactly Brett Hull's foot in the crease bad yet still pretty bad. The Preds had plenty chances to tie that game, though, including that late 5 on 3. Better team won. Preds PP just didn't get it done.

swordo84 06-12-2017 04:31 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Blaming the refs. Classic loser talk.


Congrats to the Pens and their loyal fans here!!

barbogast 06-12-2017 05:13 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Just watched the clip of the no goal.

Wow.

Good thing we have video review in sports. :rolleyes

jrkarger 06-12-2017 05:14 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
LORD STANLEY LORD STANLEY GET ME THE BRANDY!!!

https://media.giphy.com/media/l46CzD...1BUA/giphy.gif

barbogast 06-12-2017 05:15 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by swordo84 (Post 16812332)
Blaming the refs. Classic loser talk.


Congrats to the Pens and their loyal fans here!!

I didn't watch the game so I don't really know but I have to assume you're right. Never does the outcome of a game hinge fully on one call.

Still, that's a really bad time to have a clear as day blunder. Quite simply, in a world with 1080 video resolution at the push of a button, stuff like that should never happen. But especially not in game 6 of the SCF. That's true garage league stuff.

Dramageek 06-12-2017 05:22 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by barbogast (Post 16812338)
Just watched the clip of the no goal.

Wow.

Good thing we have video review in sports. :rolleyes

How does video review help that? Even live I heard the whistle. The rule is the rule. They don't even have to blow the whistle, they just have to have "intent to blow."

barbogast 06-12-2017 05:28 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dramageek (Post 16812349)
How does video review help that? Even live I heard the whistle. The rule is the rule. They don't even have to blow the whistle, they just have to have "intent to blow."

You change the stupid rule. That's step 1.

In a league where inconsequential offsides are reviewed with regularity, there is no argument you can make that will convince me that that call was acceptable.

jrkarger 06-12-2017 05:33 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
The Ref blew the whistle. The play was dead immediately in that instant. You can't review something and award a goal when the puck crosses the line when play is stopped.

bradshaw06 06-12-2017 05:35 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Walkin on sunshine

barbogast 06-12-2017 05:36 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jrkarger (Post 16812355)
The Ref blew the whistle. The play was dead immediately in that instant. You can't review something and award a goal when the puck crosses the line when play is stopped.

You should be able to

That's a ridiculous thought that with the technology available that what happened is just, eh, well ok. Shit happens.

Shit like that shouldn't, quite frankly.

Again, I'm sure the Predators had like thousand chances to tie it or take the lead or whatever.

But that play really shouldn't happen under the spotlight of SCF game 6. That's all I'm saying.

jrkarger 06-12-2017 05:42 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by barbogast (Post 16812360)
You should be able to

That's a ridiculous thought that with the technology available that what happened is just, eh, well ok. Shit happens.

Shit like that shouldn't, quite frankly.

Again, I'm sure the Predators had like thousand chances to tie it or take the lead or whatever.

But that play really shouldn't happen under the spotlight of SCF game 6. That's all I'm saying.

I wholeheartedly agree that it was a bad call in a crucial game. I'll also point out, as you did that the Preds had plenty of other chances and the Pens never had a PP at all.

With that said, I don't agree with the notion that replay would help in that instant because (at least IMO) you can't review something that happened when play was dead. You just can't; in any sport.

Now, I'll gladly debate and acknowledge that the officiating could be improved with either another ref on the ice or another ref in the booth or in Toronto that has equal authority as the dudes on the ice so he can see things the other can't.

But, even in that situation nothing can be done if a ref on the ice blows a play dead.

swordo84 06-12-2017 06:08 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by barbogast (Post 16812341)
I didn't watch the game so I don't really know but I have to assume you're right. Never does the outcome of a game hinge fully on one call.

Still, that's a really bad time to have a clear as day blunder. Quite simply, in a world with 1080 video resolution at the push of a button, stuff like that should never happen. But especially not in game 6 of the SCF. That's true garage league stuff.

Terrible call, no doubt but yes, the Preds had more than enough chances to make right and score numerous times.

Simply put, they weren't good enough last night.

YouNeverKnow25 06-12-2017 06:10 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
still trying to figure out what replay could possibly do to help last night's blunder

aeroshady 06-12-2017 06:35 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by aeroshady (Post 16765021)
Pens are going to win the Cup. You heard it hear first. I have a feeling that they are going back-to-back.

Told you so ;)

This was before the playoffs even started!

Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 16765025)
No Letang has me way off the Pens wagon.


Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLastPig (Post 16765061)
Pens SCF appearances
91, 92

08, 09

16, 17?


I don't think we will win but if we get thru the first 2 rounds I think we at least get back to the final.



Quote:

Originally Posted by barbogast (Post 16765237)
Seriously?

I'm pretty surprised so many are weary of the Penguins. I understand there's injuries and Letang is a big one, but let's not forget that they are the ultimate playoff tested team and their first opponent has virtually 0 playoff experience and their likely second opponent is the Caps and all the lol'ness that comes with that. I would love to say I feel even remotely confident in a series against the Pens but I don't. At all.

It won't surprise me even a little bit if the Pens end up in round 3 or further.

This guy got it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dramageek (Post 16765472)
Losing Letang sucks a big one, no doubt. It will likely cost the Pens a chance to repeat. But I'm not totally discounting the rest of the blue line, especially as Cole and Schultz are having career years. And with Crosby playing some of the best hockey of his career, and a healthy, hungry Malkin in full beast mode, I think they get past Columbus and have a shot against the Caps. They likely will run out of steam and feel the full effect of Letang's loss, but they'll make some noise before that.

Only Pens fan with faith early.

Quote:

Originally Posted by hailtopitt (Post 16765509)
no Letang=no repeat

:lol I bet you have never been so happy to be so wrong.

no Letang = No problem

Quote:

Originally Posted by hailtopitt (Post 16765526)
i don't think you understand how important Letang is to the Penguins then

is it possible for other guys to play poorly or mistakes? yes, of course

but if the Pens play their best hockey they still won't win because no Letang. he's the engine that propels their system.

:lol :lol :lol :lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by aeroshady (Post 16765588)
I hear what everyone is saying and I am not denying that Letang out makes it way harder. That said, It can be done. Lightning made it to game seven of the ECF without Stamkos last year. All I said was that I have a feeling about the Pens this year and that if they get out of the MET playoffs, they will be a favorite to win it all.

Hopefully I am wrong, I am not sure I want to see the Pens with the Cup again this soon :lol

When you have a feeling, just role with it. I wish I put money on that feeling now.

Quote:

Originally Posted by hailtopitt (Post 16765730)
this isn't 2014 or 2015 though

if you beat the 2 best teams in the east, and 2 of the 3 best teams overall points-wise, you're going to get attention.

that's besides the point though. i never said the Pens couldn't make a run. just no way they repeat without Letang unless some unbelievable upsets happen elsewhere around the league.

Just getting silly at this point :lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by aeroshady (Post 16768320)
Anyway, I also find it hysterical that Pens fans doubted my 4-0 sweep prediction against the Jackets. I guess it is always hard to except when your team really is that good. My feeling about the Pens just gets stronger. I think they repeat.

Still can't believe all the doubt the Pens fans had even in round 1

Quote:

Originally Posted by hailtopitt (Post 16812288)
Lol all the whining in here

Pens are better than Nashville, and that's no knock on Nashville

Supper confident once his team wins it all :lol

In all seriousness though, congrats Pens fans! Enjoy this as it is the best run in your teams history and it wont last forever. Crosby has cemented his legacy for sure.

As for me, I am sad to report that this is just the 3rd time since 1995 that I didn't watch even a second of the Finals. I just got too busy to find the time to watch any game. Not really a priority for me anymore when the Rangers are not there. I guess I am becoming an older fan now.

The other 2 series were: Anaheim v Ottawa and Buffalo vs. Dallas. Every other finals I have watched at least one game.

DMBzilla 06-12-2017 06:36 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Replay isn't really an issue here. I don't think anyone is arguing that the play wasn't dead once it blew and the goal should have counted. The quick whistle is the problem - it was a horrible call made by a ref who was in awful position. You can almost see the linesman who skates up to him on the replay say the puck was never controlled.

fonzz41 06-12-2017 07:01 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
I was saddened to see that play go down. Man, that ref and how he must feel...

In the end, one of my old coaches used to say that to win any game you have to beat two things:
The other team
The refs
Bad/missed calls are going to happen, and the goal is to be good enough that they don't matter.

aeroshady 06-12-2017 07:08 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fonzz41 (Post 16812429)
I was saddened to see that play go down. Man, that ref and how he must feel...

In the end, one of my old coaches used to say that to win any game you have to beat two things:
The other team
The refs
Bad/missed calls are going to happen, and the goal is to be good enough that they don't matter.

:thumbsup

Doesn't excuse the performance the Preds had in game 5. They put themselves in that situation.

lockman21 06-12-2017 07:28 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fonzz41 (Post 16812429)
I was saddened to see that play go down. Man, that ref and how he must feel...

In the end, one of my old coaches used to say that to win any game you have to beat two things:
The other team
The refs
Bad/missed calls are going to happen, and the goal is to be good enough that they don't matter.

Just my 2 cents - but doesn't the ref usually try to hustle behind the net real quick in that situation? So he can try and find the puck in that 1-2 seconds? He had no effort, just blew it dead.

DMBzilla 06-12-2017 07:31 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 16812445)
Just my 2 cents - but doesn't the ref usually try to hustle behind the net real quick in that situation? So he can try and find the puck in that 1-2 seconds? He had no effort, just blew it dead.

Made the same point last night. Take a half second to get behind the net and make sure.

Dramageek 06-12-2017 08:01 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
I'll certainly agree that the ref did a terrible job there. Though, as a slight counter to that, the quick whistle sometimes is used to protect the goaltender from getting plastered in the inevitable scrum. And Nashville was running Murray all series. Even so, the whistle was quick under those circumstances. And, to be fair, there is a rule under the Video Review section that allows plays whistled dead to be reviewed when it looks like the puck was going in via a "continuous action" that would have happened regardless of the whistle, whatever that exactly means. I'm not sure that applies here because Sissons hit it in well after the whistle was blown. Terrible job nonetheless.

Regardless, though I know some of you seem very sure, we can't know what would've happened if that goal counted. Yes, Rinne was playing well and the Preds were doing a good job limiting chances. But maybe the Pens would have, you know, gotten a power play (not that that had been overly effective.) Maybe Sully makes different adjustments being down a goal. There could very well have been a Game 7. However, if we are judging potential outcomes on context, then Nashville likely gets creamed in Game 7.

No matter what, it's in the books now, asterisk or no. Go to the NFL thread and ask Pats fans how much those asterisked championships bother them! :lol

jrkarger 06-12-2017 08:55 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol asterisk






Anyway, I have to say, I never get tired of seeing Mario do this....

https://www.nhl.com/news/pens-legend...am/c-289893450

fonzz41 06-12-2017 09:19 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 16812445)
Just my 2 cents - but doesn't the ref usually try to hustle behind the net real quick in that situation? So he can try and find the puck in that 1-2 seconds? He had no effort, just blew it dead.



Yes. When there's stuff going on in front of the net, the ref needs to hustle over. 9/10 times that puck is in the pads of the goalie and play can safely be stopped, and that's what happened on this. He got complacent, and the consequences were obviously huge.

Lcsulla 06-12-2017 09:49 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thechad90000 (Post 16812275)
Tough to lose in such a bullshit way. I loved how well this team played all year. I knew there was something special about them even throughout the regular season and they really shined and showed how good they really were. Congrats to the Pens. I now officially hate your team but luck didn't win you games 2 and 5 so we had our chance. Lsculla FUCK YOU and FUCK THE HAWKS.

I am just going to let this one slide because I have never had any issues with you and you do not generally drive everyone nuts with meltdowns - plus I know sports can bring out the worst in people, myself included. That said in the future please refrain from personal attacks, swearing at mods, etc, etc.

Quote:

Originally Posted by hailtopitt (Post 16812288)
Lol all the whining in here

Pens are better than Nashville, and that's no knock on Nashville

Go to espn.com - they are in full meltdown mode about a stolen cup and all that jazz. It is rather funny to read.

Quote:

Originally Posted by daveshookme (Post 16812289)
Let's be real, even if they made the correct call they still would have had to play more than half the game without giving up a goal, and then go into Pittsburgh and win.

Not saying it couldn't have happened but fuck, it would have been difficult.

That is what I was saying last night. No amount of claiming otherwise is going to change how I feel. If that goal had counted the Pens would still have had close to 40 minutes to tie it up and Pittsburgh has shown a resiliency this season that has amazed me considering how banged up they were (frankly I was stunned they made it that far) so I think they'd have eventually broken through somehow - they had an annoying knack of doing so this whole postseason. Additionally even if that was the lone goal of the the preds would still have to play a game 7 in Pittsburgh so these claims that one single call cost nashville the series is absurd IMO.

Quote:

Originally Posted by barbogast (Post 16812316)
I can't believe you, of all people, are defending the refs right now. Unreal.



Brohan's ban was not deserved.

I am the first person to criticize a bad call but this was a little different. Pollack lost sight of the puck and did what refs are supposed to do in that situation, he blew the play dead. Sure - he was a little out of position and the whistle was early IMO but the rule stands. It was a mistake on his part one a non-reviewable call (admittedly at one of the worst times possible) but I believe he genuinely thought Murray had control of the puck and blew the play dead for that reason alone. Sure it sucks to lose a goal that way but personally I would rather have something like that cost me a goal because the rule is clearly defined as opposed to say losing a goal on a bogus interference call or a questionable offsides call. Believe me, I was no fan of either of those two teams but acting like that one call cheated nashville out of the cup is preposterous because the preds had plenty of other A+ chances they didn't cash in.

Regarding that ban, the guy was just ranting and raving (a rather constant theme for him) and contributing nothing to the thread. If you notice I also warned him first but he kept at it. The ban is only a week (the shortest we have on the menu) so acting like it was a game misconduct is simply not true, I just wanted to keep the thread on topic. I do not often try and justify my decisions as a mod but this was nothing personal - I barely know they guy so I do not like or dislike him, he was trolling and that is listed as something we ban people for.

daveshookme 06-12-2017 09:56 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lcsulla (Post 16812569)
That is what I was saying last night. No amount of claiming otherwise is going to change how I feel. If that goal had counted the Pens would still have had close to 40 minutes to tie it up and Pittsburgh has shown a resiliency this season that has amazed me considering how banged up they were (frankly I was stunned they made it that far) so I think they'd have eventually broken through somehow - they had an annoying knack of doing so this whole postseason. Additionally even if that was the lone goal of the the preds would still have to play a game 7 in Pittsburgh so these claims that one single call cost nashville the series is absurd IMO.



I mean, there is SOME merit to the argument. I won't say it definitively cost them the series but give them a lead at home and maybe they buckle down and tighten up defensively and with Rinne's play it's possible they pull out the W, and then heading into game 7 anything can happen.

But it was a bullshit call, and even though the whistle blew the puck went in like a half second later, whoever it was that "put it in" was already in the motion of scoring and I think there should be a method in place to be able to count the goal. It was the right call given the rules, but the rules are wrong in this instance, IMO.

daveshookme 06-12-2017 09:57 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (Penns are garage league champs)
 
Side note: have they announced when the parade is? If it's Wednesday I may try to get down there.

Lcsulla 06-12-2017 10:23 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by daveshookme (Post 16812579)
I mean, there is SOME merit to the argument. I won't say it definitively cost them the series but give them a lead at home and maybe they buckle down and tighten up defensively and with Rinne's play it's possible they pull out the W, and then heading into game 7 anything can happen.

But it was a bullshit call, and even though the whistle blew the puck went in like a half second later, whoever it was that "put it in" was already in the motion of scoring and I think there should be a method in place to be able to count the goal. It was the right call given the rules, but the rules are wrong in this instance, IMO.

I can agree it was a quick whistle but that one play alone cannot convince me that a single borderline call cost them the game, let alone the series. All our teams have had goals disallowed for various reasons (admittedly rarely in the SCF) but as I said I would rather have a goal disallowed on a clear cut play that was in line with the rules than lose one due to say questionable interference or offsides.

barbogast 06-12-2017 10:26 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lcsulla (Post 16812569)
I am just going to let this one slide because I have never had any issues with you and you do not generally drive everyone nuts with meltdowns - plus I know sports can bring out the worst in people, myself included. That said in the future please refrain from personal attacks, swearing at mods, etc, etc.



Go to espn.com - they are in full meltdown mode about a stolen cup and all that jazz. It is rather funny to read.



That is what I was saying last night. No amount of claiming otherwise is going to change how I feel. If that goal had counted the Pens would still have had close to 40 minutes to tie it up and Pittsburgh has shown a resiliency this season that has amazed me considering how banged up they were (frankly I was stunned they made it that far) so I think they'd have eventually broken through somehow - they had an annoying knack of doing so this whole postseason. Additionally even if that was the lone goal of the the preds would still have to play a game 7 in Pittsburgh so these claims that one single call cost nashville the series is absurd IMO.



I am the first person to criticize a bad call but this was a little different. Pollack lost sight of the puck and did what refs are supposed to do in that situation, he blew the play dead. Sure - he was a little out of position and the whistle was early IMO but the rule stands. It was a mistake on his part one a non-reviewable call (admittedly at one of the worst times possible) but I believe he genuinely thought Murray had control of the puck and blew the play dead for that reason alone. Sure it sucks to lose a goal that way but personally I would rather have something like that cost me a goal because the rule is clearly defined as opposed to say losing a goal on a bogus interference call or a questionable offsides call. Believe me, I was no fan of either of those two teams but acting like that one call cheated nashville out of the cup is preposterous because the preds had plenty of other A+ chances they didn't cash in.

Regarding that ban, the guy was just ranting and raving (a rather constant theme for him) and contributing nothing to the thread. If you notice I also warned him first but he kept at it. The ban is only a week (the shortest we have on the menu) so acting like it was a game misconduct is simply not true, I just wanted to keep the thread on topic. I do not often try and justify my decisions as a mod but this was nothing personal - I barely know they guy so I do not like or dislike him, he was trolling and that is listed as something we ban people for.

After how you constantly bash, berate and even threaten violence (which of course you aren't gonna act on) towards referees, I do not buy your calmness

If that was the Hawks, you would be in screaming cocksucker, Stevie Wonder and proposing decapitation via hockey stick. Let's be real here.

I know that everything you've said is correct, but I can't believe it's coming from you.

thechad90000 06-12-2017 10:31 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lcsulla (Post 16812569)
I am just going to let this one slide because I have never had any issues with you and you do not generally drive everyone nuts with meltdowns - plus I know sports can bring out the worst in people, myself included. That said in the future please refrain from personal attacks, swearing at mods, etc, etc.

Got it. Emotion was running high last night and the first comment I see is a bunch of pro-Pens comments from a Hawks fan. My bad.

I still stand by the Fuck the Hawks though.

thechad90000 06-12-2017 10:34 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lcsulla (Post 16812607)
I can agree it was a quick whistle but that one play alone cannot convince me that a single borderline call cost them the game, let alone the series. All our teams have had goals disallowed for various reasons (admittedly rarely in the SCF) but as I said I would rather have a goal disallowed on a clear cut play that was in line with the rules than lose one due to say questionable interference or offsides.

It's not a single call and it's not borderline. There were two close games in this series and both were one goal games where the Pens won after Nashville had disallowed goals. Game 1, the disallowed goal obviously changes the momentum of a game. But forget about Game 1. This was a 0-0 game until 1:30 in the 3rd. Pens would have had an empty net had it been 1-0. It's not theoretical. The no goal cost us the game. Sure we had chances after; but it changes the entire complexion of a game.

TMoore4075 06-12-2017 10:35 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by YouNeverKnow25 (Post 16779136)
I'll say this: there is precisely zero point zero chance that MAF negotiated for the NMC only to waive it for nothing later

So apparently he waived it for nothing to allow him to be taken by Vegas.

jrkarger 06-12-2017 10:37 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TMoore4075 (Post 16812623)
So apparently he waived it for nothing to allow him to be taken by Vegas.

Did this just happen?

EDIT: Found this: http://www.pensburgh.com/2017/6/12/1...-rumors-fleury

Lcsulla 06-12-2017 10:38 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by barbogast (Post 16812612)
After how you constantly bash, berate and even threaten violence (which of course you aren't gonna act on) towards referees, I do not buy your calmness

The difference is that I let it go and just stop posting after one or two rants. It was easy to be calm actually, I am no fan of either of those teams. :lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by thechad90000 (Post 16812617)
Got it. Emotion was running high last night and the first comment I see is a bunch of pro-Pens comments from a Hawks fan. My bad.

I still stand by the Fuck the Hawks though.

No worries, issue is dead. As for your hating the Hawks, doesn't bug me - you are free to love and hate whatever teams you wish, same as all of us.

PS... my comments were not really pro-pens per se - truthfully I cannot stand that franchise for the simple reason that they tormented my Whalers for the first 20 years of my life. That said, I respect the way they played this season and I have a problem when people are constantly making the absurd claim that one quick whistle cost nashville the game and the series because even if it counted there were still nearly 40 minutes left to play last night and if the preds had won they'd still face a game 7 on the road.

YouNeverKnow25 06-12-2017 10:40 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TMoore4075 (Post 16812623)
So apparently he waived it for nothing to allow him to be taken by Vegas.

not forcing a buyout is not the same thing as "for nothing"

TMoore4075 06-12-2017 10:42 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jrkarger (Post 16812626)
Did this just happen?

EDIT: Found this: http://www.pensburgh.com/2017/6/12/1...-rumors-fleury

I saw it somewhere earlier today too. No one ever said he could waive it for the expansion draft, like you can for a trade, so just assumed he couldn't. If this is true, it's the best solution for everyone.

Lcsulla 06-12-2017 10:43 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thechad90000 (Post 16812620)
This was a 0-0 game until 1:30 in the 3rd. Pens would have had an empty net had it been 1-0. It's not theoretical. The no goal cost us the game. Sure we had chances after; but it changes the entire complexion of a game.

That assumes the preds could have prevented the pens from tying it up though, definitely not something you could have counted on. Yeah, Rinnne and the D were playing well but the Pens were getting good chances and with the talent of their offense I do not believe it is a stretch to think they could have cashed in a chance and tied the game.

If I was in your shoes I would be pissed off too but since I am a fan of neither team it is probably easier for me to see it objectively in context. It is a sucky way to lose but shit happens in sports, we have all seen that.

Dramageek 06-12-2017 10:43 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by daveshookme (Post 16812580)
Side note: have they announced when the parade is? If it's Wednesday I may try to get down there.

I've heard Wednesday. It will be going right in front of my building (the Gulf Tower) so I'm pretty stoked about that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by thechad90000 (Post 16812620)
It's not a single call and it's not borderline. There were two close games in this series and both were one goal games where the Pens won after Nashville had disallowed goals. Game 1, the disallowed goal obviously changes the momentum of a game. But forget about Game 1. This was a 0-0 game until 1:30 in the 3rd. Pens would have had an empty net had it been 1-0. It's not theoretical. The no goal cost us the game. Sure we had chances after; but it changes the entire complexion of a game.

The only thing about this is that you assume the Pens would not have scored. Given the way things were going, that's a reasonable assumption. However, we just don't know. Maybe the Pens get a power play. Maybe the Pens tie it up with an empty net, and the Preds lose in overtime. We will never know.

daveshookme 06-12-2017 10:45 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (Penns are garage league champs)
 
Yeah I'm just reading now. The mayor said they will have one but no details get. Last year it was a Sunday win and a Wednesday parade, so looks good so far. I'm off Wednesday and may come down to visit my sister. Guess I'll start looking at flights today.

YouNeverKnow25 06-12-2017 10:46 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (Penns are garage league champs)
 
no you guys the predators absolutely win the imaginary game that took place after the imaginary goal

hailtopitt 06-12-2017 11:39 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DMBzilla (Post 16812301)
"They had other chances to score" is such a bullshit argument. Both teams had chances all game. The ref blew the call when it mattered and it cost Nashville the game, and series, period. To lose that way is horrible.


Literally everything is wrong in this post.

You can try to discredit the Pens all you want. But you can't. No one can.

Penguins have had clear cut goals taken off the board in these playoffs too but found a way to win.

Heart of a champion. Crosby's legacy is untouchable. Deal with it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by aeroshady (Post 16812405)
Told you so ;)



This was before the playoffs even started!





















This guy got it.







Only Pens fan with faith early.







:lol I bet you have never been so happy to be so wrong.



no Letang = No problem







:lol :lol :lol :lol







When you have a feeling, just role with it. I wish I put money on that feeling now.







Just getting silly at this point :lol







Still can't believe all the doubt the Pens fans had even in round 1







Supper confident once his team wins it all :lol



In all seriousness though, congrats Pens fans! Enjoy this as it is the best run in your teams history and it wont last forever. Crosby has cemented his legacy for sure.
.


Why all the lol guys? I pretty much called my shot there. Still very surprised they repeated but I also said it was possible if a huge upset took place.

Nashville swept Chicago, there's your upset. I firmly believe the pens would've been too tired/depleted to beat a healthy, hot Blackhawks team in the final. But Nashville helped us by winning the west and just couldn't match the pens talent, speed and experience.

hailtopitt 06-12-2017 11:44 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by daveshookme (Post 16812579)
I mean, there is SOME merit to the argument. I won't say it definitively cost them the series but give them a lead at home and maybe they buckle down and tighten up defensively and with Rinne's play it's possible they pull out the W, and then heading into game 7 anything can happen.

But it was a bullshit call, and even though the whistle blew the puck went in like a half second later, whoever it was that "put it in" was already in the motion of scoring and I think there should be a method in place to be able to count the goal. It was the right call given the rules, but the rules are wrong in this instance, IMO.



It can't be "the right call given the rules" and a "bullshit call" at the same time. Can't have your cake and it eat it too.

Ref made the right call. That play happens all the time. Sucks for Nashville it happened in the SCF but that's the rule. Every team has been screwed by it before at some point.

Need to learn how to move on from it and overcome that adversity. That's how you become a champion.

TMoore4075 06-12-2017 11:46 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (Penns are garage league champs)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jrkarger (Post 16812626)
Did this just happen?

EDIT: Found this: http://www.pensburgh.com/2017/6/12/1...-rumors-fleury

@renlavoietva : Marc-André Fleury accepted the Penguins request in February to waive his no move clause for the expansion draft. Only for Las Vegas.
Quote:

Originally Posted by YouNeverKnow25 (Post 16812631)
not forcing a buyout is not the same thing as "for nothing"

A buyout would have served him better because then he'd get paid a big chunk and he could sign with whoever he wanted and your argument then was that he would look out for himself first and not really care about the Pens. Him waiving it benefits the Pens more than him.

daveshookme 06-12-2017 11:47 AM

The NHL Thread (Penns are garage league champs)
 
Ugh the only flight that gets me there before the 1130 parade start Wednesday means I have to catch the 0600 out of Albany. Fucking early.

Edit: this is based on last years 1130 start. No details on this years yet.

jrkarger 06-12-2017 11:50 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (Penns are garage league champs)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hailtopitt (Post 16812707)
It can't be "the right call given the rules" and a "bullshit call" at the same time. Can't have your cake and it eat it too.

Ref made the right call. That play happens all the time. Sucks for Nashville it happened in the SCF but that's the rule. Every team has been screwed by it before at some point.

Need to learn how to move on from it and overcome that adversity. That's how you become a champion.

You can even make the "argument" that the refs tried to make up that call for the rest of the game. No penalties on the Preds in an entire game?

The Pred had 3:12 of consecutive power play in the 3rd and that included 0:30+ of 5 on 3. Couldn't get it done. There was one sequence during the end of the 5 on 3 that subban and someone else just played catch for about 0:10.

barbogast 06-12-2017 11:53 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by YouNeverKnow25 (Post 16812639)
no you guys the predators absolutely win the imaginary game that took place after the imaginary goal

Pretty much no one is saying this at all but ok

Quote:

Originally Posted by hailtopitt (Post 16812707)
It can't be "the right call given the rules" and a "bullshit call" at the same time. Can't have your cake and it eat it too.

Ref made the right call. That play happens all the time. Sucks for Nashville it happened in the SCF but that's the rule. Every team has been screwed by it before at some point.

Need to learn how to move on from it and overcome that adversity. That's how you become a champion.

The point is, it shouldn't happen all the time. There's ways to make it not happen. Pretty easily, too.

The NHL should be embarrassed that they have to deal with this today.

Garage league strikes again. That's all anyone is really saying.

jrkarger 06-12-2017 11:55 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by barbogast (Post 16812724)
Pretty much no one is saying this at all but ok



The point is, it shouldn't happen all the time. There's ways to make it not happen. Pretty easily, too.

The NHL should be embarrassed that they have to deal with this today.

Garage league strikes again. That's all anyone is really saying.

I'm still trying to figure out how this is easily avoided when a ref on the ice whistles the play dead.

barbogast 06-12-2017 11:56 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (Penns are garage league champs)
 
Also I liked the thread title better with the (where the President's trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't) better than the garage leauge one. I vote we go with that.

barbogast 06-12-2017 11:58 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jrkarger (Post 16812730)
I'm still trying to figure out how this is easily avoided when a ref on the ice whistles the play dead.

There are cameras all over the building

Save the response about "but the play is dead so that means all of a sudden Im blind and can't process things" nonsense.

The puck wasn't covered. Period. Everyone in the building minus the one that blew the whistle knew that. So let's fix the fucking rulebook. It's a common sense thing. That's what I'm trying to get at.

Just because "the play is dead" doesn't mean I lose ability to see and respond to what is happening. As reasonable people, we should probably implement a system that keeps this from happening. It doesn't need to.

Again, the fact that this happened is textbook NHL stuff and now they have to hear about it all day. Which is what they deserve. Because that was ridiculous and far too important of a game for something like that to have happened.

barbogast 06-12-2017 11:59 AM

Re: The NHL Thread (Penns are garage league champs)
 
I'm not sure why you don't think this can be easily avoided, kargs

jrkarger 06-12-2017 12:02 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by barbogast (Post 16812739)
There are cameras all over the building

Save the response about "but the play is dead so that means all of a sudden Im blind and can't process things" nonsense.

The puck wasn't covered. Period. Everyone in the building minus the one that blew the whistle knew that. So let's fix the fucking rulebook. It's a common sense thing. That's what I'm trying to get at.

Just because "the play is dead" doesn't mean I lose ability to see and respond to what is happening. As reasonable people, we should probably implement a system that keeps this from happening. It doesn't need to.

Again, the fact that this happened is textbook NHL stuff and now they have to hear about it all day. Which is what they deserve. Because that was ridiculous and far too important of a game for something like that to have happened.

How on earth to you write something like this into the rule book?

A whistle blows but how long to do the players get to use "common sense" and play on?

A whistle blows and the goalie pulls up but the shooter doesn't... still a good goal?

I'm not saying it was a good call at all. I'm saying there is nothing you can do once a whistle blows. Play is dead.

jrkarger 06-12-2017 12:03 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (Penns are garage league champs)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by barbogast (Post 16812741)
I'm not sure why you don't think this can be easily avoided, kargs

See my above post. How would you legislate something like that... what would be allowable after a whistle blows and for how long?

barbogast 06-12-2017 12:05 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jrkarger (Post 16812748)
How on earth to you write something like this into the rule book?

A whistle blows but how long to do the players get to use "common sense" and play on?

A whistle blows and the goalie pulls up but the shooter doesn't... still a good goal?

This is lunacy.

I'm not saying it was a good call at all. I'm saying there is nothing you can do once a whistle blows. Play is dead. I don't understand why this is a difficult concept.

I'm saying let's exclude the puck being covered thing as irreversible damage. If the puck wasn't covered, and video replay can prove that, write the rule that the goal therefore counts.

There are rules that require a bit of subjectivity all throughout the rulebook. This can be cut and dry enough that, even with that subjectivity, a rule can be written.

Rule 1230497123047 part a) if the ref blows the whistle and negates a goal because he believes the puck was covered, but video replay proves that the puck was not covered, the goal shall stand.

Not sure why that's a difficult concept.

YouNeverKnow25 06-12-2017 12:07 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (Penns are garage league champs)
 
schrodinger's cat is both dead and alive at the same time. players should both play and not play, with no regard for whistles, until the end of time and let the replay cameras figure out what was supposed to happen

barbogast 06-12-2017 12:08 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (Penns are garage league champs)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by YouNeverKnow25 (Post 16812758)
schrodinger's cat is both dead and alive at the same time. players should both play and not play, with no regard for whistles, until the end of time and let the replay cameras figure out what was supposed to happen

Rattled Vanilla Pens fan being rattled

That's literally not at all what anyone is saying.

TMoore4075 06-12-2017 12:09 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (Penns are garage league champs)
 
All the arguing about playoff games makes me think...Can't wait for the draft!

YouNeverKnow25 06-12-2017 12:09 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (Penns are garage league champs)
 
no, anyone is not saying that. you, specifically, are saying that. don't hide behind a non existent group.

barbogast 06-12-2017 12:10 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (Penns are garage league champs)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by YouNeverKnow25 (Post 16812766)
no, anyone is not saying that. you, specifically, are saying that. don't hide behind a non existent group.

I have said nothing at all resembling let players play with total anarchy

Get a grip bud

The fact that you guys are defending this obnoxiously bad blunder with such conviction is impressive

jrkarger 06-12-2017 12:12 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by barbogast (Post 16812756)
I'm saying let's exclude the puck being covered thing as irreversible damage. If the puck wasn't covered, and video replay can prove that, write the rule that the goal therefore counts.

There are rules that require a bit of subjectivity all throughout the rulebook. This can be cut and dry enough that, even with that subjectivity, a rule can be written.

Rule 1230497123047 part a) if the ref blows the whistle and negates a goal because he believes the puck was covered, but video replay proves that the puck was not covered, the goal shall stand.

Not sure why that's a difficult concept.

I get what you are saying but there are WAY to many hypotheticals to account for to allow play after a whistle.

What if in that instance the whistle blows but instead of the puck going in the net the Pens got an odd man break the other way and scored? Still a good goal?

How long do they get to play after a whistle?

What if a team enters a zone offside and one ref blows his whistle? Can they play on until the goalie covers the puck or they lose the zone before you review the offside?

YouNeverKnow25 06-12-2017 12:15 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (Penns are garage league champs)
 
a group states that the call sucked but there's no other way to interpret the rules

an individual states that the rulebook should be changed because he's just so steamed that the team he hates won

I guess insanity is just a matter of perspective

Lcsulla 06-12-2017 12:17 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (Penns are garage league champs)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jrkarger (Post 16812720)
You can even make the "argument" that the refs tried to make up that call for the rest of the game. No penalties on the Preds in an entire game?

The Pred had 3:12 of consecutive power play in the 3rd and that included 0:30+ of 5 on 3. Couldn't get it done. There was one sequence during the end of the 5 on 3 that subban and someone else just played catch for about 0:10.

Also, I believe it is worth noting that karma is a bitch. In game 5 sissions gave a cheap shot to maata that smashed his face but was somehow not suspended so I find it rather fitting that he scored the 'goal' that got called back.

I also agree with what you said - I would also point out that Nashville got some soft calls that resulted in PP's = specifically the minor on Sheary that was pretty much a makeup call for the quick whistle - not to mention rinne certain deserved a slashing penalty a few minutes after that phantom goal but was not called for it.

barbogast 06-12-2017 12:17 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where the Presidents Trophy matters but covering the puck doesn't
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jrkarger (Post 16812770)
I get what you are saying but there are WAY to many hypotheticals to account for to allow play after a whistle.

What if in that instance the whistle blows but instead of the puck going in the net the Pens got an odd man break the other way and scored? Still a good goal?

How long do they get to play after a whistle?

What if a team enters a zone offside and one ref blows his whistle? Can they play on until the goalie covers the puck or they lose the zone before you review the offside?

I think in instances specifically like what happened last night (a team knocks in a loose puck as the whistle is being blown or immediately after, something that happens frequently) should be reversible. I don't think it's unreasonable to write a rule that that play can be reviewed and reversed if necessary. As for everything else, for now it should stand as it is. If the puck isn't covered but the whistle goes, so long as the puck isn't in the process of going into the net (like last night), the play is dead.

I understand it's subjective. But there are already subjective rules that allow and disallow goals. This type of play shouldn't be excluded from that after-the-fact subjectivity. It shouldn't be an oops, we fucked up hard, but the rule is the rule and that's that. It's not unreasonable to word a rule to keep this specific situation from going the wrong way.

The other situations are too complicated and therefore can't be written. But this one can.

barbogast 06-12-2017 12:19 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (Penns are garage league champs)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by YouNeverKnow25 (Post 16812777)
a group states that the call sucked but there's no other way to interpret the rules

an individual states that the rulebook should be changed because he's just so steamed that the team he hates won

I guess insanity is just a matter of perspective

I have no interest in continuing with you.

I don't see you in here much but we don't usually do this kind of hocus pocus trolling thing in here. It doesn't have anything to do with it being the Pens or whoever. If you choose to not have a reasonable conversation, I am finished responding to you.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.14
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All trademarks and copyrights are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest is owned by antsmarching.org.