Antsmarching.org Forums - Dave Matthews Band Discussion

Antsmarching.org Forums - Dave Matthews Band Discussion (https://www.antsmarching.org/forum/index.php)
-   The Tailgate (https://www.antsmarching.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=93)
-   -   The NHL Thread (https://www.antsmarching.org/forum/showthread.php?t=324692)

UCFish 11-03-2011 07:42 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dmbmuskie (Post 13072995)
I think I'm going to invest in the package. I hate not being able to watch.

Best investment I have made....

Although non-HD games and being forced to watch the opponents feed is rough...

So far I love the Ducks announcers and Florida's has some energy as well.

Phoenix announcers are the WORST

UCFish 11-03-2011 07:43 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Brohan_Santana (Post 13073009)
Sup bitches

Sup?

U gonna watch Caps games with GoCubsGO? and be BFFLs?

Brohan_Santana 11-03-2011 07:47 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by UCFish (Post 13073023)
Sup?

U gonna watch Caps games with GoCubsGO? and be BFFLs?

They do say the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Anything could happen

~Crashintome89~ 11-03-2011 07:50 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Game tonight was horrific. Matt Carle, Braydon Coburn, and Andreas Lilja should be ashamed of themselves. You can't win NHL games when you have 18 giveaways.

gocubsgo3822 11-03-2011 07:52 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Caps are so good.

Caps>>>> Blackhawks

Roose13 11-03-2011 07:55 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Fuck the shoot out

thechad90000 11-03-2011 08:01 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
I'm glad we've finally decided to take our heads out of our asses and shoot the puck for once.

~Crashintome89~ 11-03-2011 08:15 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gocubsgo3822 (Post 13073051)
Caps are so good.

Caps>>>> Blackhawks

Yeah...in President's Trophies.

Brohan_Santana 11-03-2011 08:20 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Caps >>>>>>>>> any PA hockey team

thechad90000 11-03-2011 08:22 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Wow I just noticed how empty that Phoenix arena is..damn.

bonzo48280 11-03-2011 08:27 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Caps

:lol

thechad90000 11-03-2011 08:37 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fonzz41 (Post 13071686)
I think Suter just became the odd man out. Which is too bad, he's one of the more underrated d-men in the league. He'll get a lovely contract somewhere else.

Yeah it's looking that way because Weber is going to be the one they go after and it may leave Suter out. But there was some talk going on before this that we wouldn't be able to sign any of them so I'll be very happy to have 2 of the 3.

gocubsgo3822 11-03-2011 08:38 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Crashintome89~ (Post 13073104)
Yeah...in President's Trophies.

How about not give up three goals to us in two minutes then talk

bonzo48280 11-03-2011 08:40 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Phoenix and Nashville in Phoenix.


Attendance is probably 19

UCFish 11-03-2011 08:41 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thechad90000 (Post 13073127)
Wow I just noticed how empty that Phoenix arena is..damn.

it is horrible

bradshaw06 11-03-2011 08:58 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
the Sullivan Malkin Neal line is just dominate out there. awesome to see

~Crashintome89~ 11-03-2011 09:07 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gocubsgo3822 (Post 13073193)
How about not give up three goals to us in two minutes then talk

2008 ECQF. Enough said.

gocubsgo3822 11-03-2011 09:10 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Crashintome89~ (Post 13073332)
2008 ECQF. Enough said.

Patrick kane: 4:06 in Overtime nuff said

~Crashintome89~ 11-03-2011 09:11 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gocubsgo3822 (Post 13073346)
Patrick kane: 4:06 in Overtime nuff said

So what? At least we've been to the Finals more than once. Jesus...:lol:lol:lol

bonzo48280 11-03-2011 09:12 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Crashintome89~ (Post 13073350)
So what? At least we've been to the Finals more than once. Jesus...:lol:lol:lol

:lol :lol yeah that's what matters, getting there.

gocubsgo3822 11-03-2011 09:13 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Cant help what happened in the past. We have been to the same amount of finals since 98

gocubsgo3822 11-03-2011 09:13 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bonzo48280 (Post 13073354)
:lol :lol yeah that's what matters, getting there.


:lol :lol :lol :lol :thumbsup :thumbsup

~Crashintome89~ 11-03-2011 09:15 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bonzo48280 (Post 13073354)
:lol :lol yeah that's what matters, getting there.

Give me a break, we're talking to a Caps fan here.

bonzo48280 11-03-2011 09:17 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Crashintome89~ (Post 13073362)
Give me a break, we're talking to a Caps fan here.

just standing up for my team here. I'm all for dissing the Caps, but I'll be policing Blackhawk bashing.

bradshaw06 11-03-2011 09:18 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
lol whos bashing the hawks? Brohan and gocubs are bringing lolz right now.

bonzo48280 11-03-2011 09:19 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
I get it now. You weren't talking about being to more finals than the Hawks, you were saying you've been to more finals than the Caps. Got it.

Carry On.

Caps :lol

thechad90000 11-03-2011 09:28 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Rinne with the 35 save birthday shutout. Nice.

bonzo48280 11-03-2011 09:34 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
yep, Rinne is unreal.

~Crashintome89~ 11-03-2011 09:51 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Rinne proving he deserves that money. I like it.

bonzo48280 11-03-2011 09:52 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Crashintome89~ (Post 13073521)
Rinne proving he deserves that money. I like it.

unfortunately he totally does

~Crashintome89~ 11-03-2011 09:54 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bonzo48280 (Post 13073525)
unfortunately he totally does

That's funny because there are still a minority of people who think that Nashville is complete shit because they're in the south and hockey doesn't belong there. So anytime Nashville signs a player long term, or has a run to the playoffs, they quickly dismiss it.

bonzo48280 11-03-2011 09:57 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Crashintome89~ (Post 13073534)
That's funny because there are still a minority of people who think that Nashville is complete shit because they're in the south and hockey doesn't belong there. So anytime Nashville signs a player long term, or has a run to the playoffs, they quickly dismiss it.

Nashville is a very good team, and you never ever kill them, you have to claw and scratch to a win. I hate them so much

lockman21 11-03-2011 09:57 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Crashintome89~ (Post 13073534)
That's funny because there are still a minority of people who think that Nashville is complete shit because they're in the south and hockey doesn't belong there. So anytime Nashville signs a player long term, or has a run to the playoffs, they quickly dismiss it.

I just hate long term goalie contracts in today's NHL. I think they're idiotic. Rinne and Bryz included.

thechad90000 11-03-2011 09:58 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Very happy to be able to pay him what he deserves so he sticks around. Now we'll just see what happens with the whole Weber/Suter situation.

Also bonzo...don't hate...

~Crashintome89~ 11-03-2011 09:59 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 13073551)
I just hate long term goalie contracts in today's NHL. I think they're idiotic. Rinne and Bryz included.

What, no Dipietro? :lol:lol:lol

~Crashintome89~ 11-03-2011 09:59 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bonzo48280 (Post 13073547)
Nashville is a very good team, and you never ever kill them, you have to claw and scratch to a win. I hate them so much

You guys are getting soft. You never complimented teams before.

lockman21 11-03-2011 10:01 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Crashintome89~ (Post 13073559)
What, no Dipietro? :lol:lol:lol

:lol:lol That one is a given. I was pointing out goalies that actually are debatable whether they were a good or bad idea. Glass bones's contract is just stupid and everyone knows it.

~Crashintome89~ 11-03-2011 10:05 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 13073572)
:lol:lol That one is a given. I was pointing out goalies that actually are debatable whether they were a good or bad idea. Glass bones's contract is just stupid and everyone knows it.

Finally, the Islanders seemed to have turned the corner with the direction of their franchise. Mike Millbury should never sniff another GM position for as long as he lives. What an embarrassment he turned the Isles into.

lockman21 11-03-2011 10:07 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Crashintome89~ (Post 13073590)
Finally, the Islanders seemed to have turned the corner with the direction of their franchise. Mike Millbury should never sniff another GM position for as long as he lives. What an embarrassment he turned the Isles into.

Millbury should never sniff a hockey rink for the rest of his life, let alone a GM position.

bonzo48280 11-03-2011 10:15 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Crashintome89~ (Post 13073563)
You guys are getting soft. You never complimented teams before.

Everytime I compliment another hockey team, I lose one hour of my life.

~Crashintome89~ 11-03-2011 10:16 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 13073593)
Millbury should never sniff a hockey rink for the rest of his life, let alone a GM position.

Every time I see his fat, goofy face I think of Austin Powers:

"Really, who throws a shoe?!?"

lockman21 11-03-2011 10:20 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Crashintome89~ (Post 13073608)
Every time I see his fat, goofy face I think of Austin Powers:

"Really, who throws a shoe?!?"

Mad lolz

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsEXqCXycRA

dmbmuskie 11-03-2011 11:32 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Another night, another injury.

TMoore4075 11-04-2011 06:14 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Wings can't score to save their lives. WTF? Can't imagine Holland letting this go on for too long. 2 years ago when they were struggling they didn't have cap space now they do..

fonzz41 11-04-2011 07:17 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 13072520)
Meh. I'll pass. Guy is absolutely solid but will be overpaid and won't be as productive once he's separated from Weber. He'll become one of "those guys".

Disagree. But it wouldn't be the first time :)
Quote:

Originally Posted by thechad90000 (Post 13073188)
Yeah it's looking that way because Weber is going to be the one they go after and it may leave Suter out. But there was some talk going on before this that we wouldn't be able to sign any of them so I'll be very happy to have 2 of the 3.

For sure. You take what you can get in the salary cap world sometimes, and Nashville's done a good job of locking up two very core players. I'm still of the opinion that Weber is the best all-around defenseman in the game. And Rinne... well, last night says it all.

kev87lads 11-04-2011 07:19 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
I'll be seeing Rinne and the Preds take on my Flyers when I go to the game in Nashville on January 14. Yipppieeeeeeeee!

mr.MikeD 11-04-2011 07:21 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
bizarro world in the nhl, Toronto on top of the east, Oilers top of the west, 6 game winning streak.... very strange

Giant Jew 11-04-2011 10:10 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Sabres have really been shitting the bed recently. Interesting to see Enroth is starting tonight after he came in and almost saved the Sabres on Wednesday. I'm glad to see a little bit of competition brewing between Enroth and Miller but some people are getting a bit out of hand by saying there is a full-on goalie controversy going on right now. Maybe in a few weeks if Miller keeps sucking...

DMBCubs25 11-04-2011 12:25 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mr.MikeD (Post 13074086)
bizarro world in the nhl, Toronto on top of the east, Oilers top of the west, 6 game winning streak.... very strange

Also nice to see Van take it off the chin last night as well!

Bron Yr Aur 11-04-2011 01:55 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/...mpid=131298059

This seems bizarre to me. I thought JVR was having a pretty solid year so far.

fonzz41 11-04-2011 02:13 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DMBCubs25 (Post 13075878)
Also nice to see Van take it off the chin last night as well!

Speaking of taking one in the chin, how about ol' Clutterbuck giving one to the linesman?

http://video.nhl.com/videocenter/con...d=35&id=132654

~Crashintome89~ 11-04-2011 02:53 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
And the NHL is getting shit on again in the Tailgate.

fonzz41 11-04-2011 02:57 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Crashintome89~ (Post 13076633)
And the NHL is getting shit on again in the Tailgate.

Rally the troops.

bonzo48280 11-04-2011 05:41 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Yep, Kane and Hossa :)

bonzo48280 11-04-2011 05:44 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Carcillo!

bonzo48280 11-04-2011 05:44 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Flood gates are open

lockman21 11-04-2011 06:04 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Just spent the past 4 or 5 hours playing puck in multiple different places. I'm exhausted. Time to feast and relax watching the Hawks.

UCFish 11-04-2011 06:10 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
high scoring period

Bron Yr Aur 11-04-2011 06:12 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Hawks need some work on defense. They miss Keith. Leddy with the horrible turnover, Seabrook completely blowing coverage. Not to mention Emery. :rolleyes

bonzo48280 11-04-2011 06:14 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bron Yr Aur (Post 13077083)
Hawks need some work on defense. They miss Keith. Leddy with the horrible turnover, Seabrook completely blowing coverage. Not to mention Emery. :rolleyes

yeah, these goals were Emery's fault. I can't think of one goal that I put on Emery.

Blackhawks fans just need a goalie to hate, it's what they're used to.

Bron Yr Aur 11-04-2011 06:18 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bonzo48280 (Post 13077087)
yeah, these goals were Emery's fault. I can't think of one goal that I put on Emery.

Blackhawks fans just need a goalie to hate, it's what they're used to.

I'm not saying they were Emery's fault. Clearly you ignored the part where I blamed Leddy, Keith, and said the defense needs work.

But he hasn't been good tonight. He's been kicking big rebounds into the middle of the ice all night and his side-to-side movement doesn't look very strong.

lockman21 11-04-2011 06:38 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Brunette is SO FUCKING SLOW.

lockman21 11-04-2011 06:40 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Nevermind.

bonzo48280 11-04-2011 06:41 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
he sped up then?

lockman21 11-04-2011 06:59 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Jesus the Lightning are fucking boring.

lockman21 11-04-2011 07:00 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
OH MY GOD THE LIGHTNING ARE SO FUCKING BORING.

This is driving me insane.

lockman21 11-04-2011 07:02 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
The Lightning are apparently happy with just trying to get the 2 points in OT. This last 5 minutes has been more boring than watching paint dry.

bonzo48280 11-04-2011 07:04 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
points in 11 of 13 games......



queue "Hawks suck" comments.

Get the extra point

lockman21 11-04-2011 07:08 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
I have an awful feeling about this.

lockman21 11-04-2011 07:11 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Yep. There it is.

UCFish 11-04-2011 07:12 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
damn.....at least it is a point

bonzo48280 11-04-2011 07:13 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Nashville, Tampa, and Phoenix. Probably my 3 least favorite teams to play and we have played them all in the last 2 weeks. At least the next 2 weeks are St Louis, 2 against Vancouver, 2 against Calgary, and 2 against Edmonton. That should be much more fun to watch.

Bron Yr Aur 11-04-2011 07:13 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Team simply needs to learn how to play for 60 minutes. Can't be blowing leads left and right like this.

lockman21 11-04-2011 07:15 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bonzo48280 (Post 13077203)
Nashville, Tampa, and Phoenix. Probably my 3 least favorite teams to play and we have played them all in the last 2 weeks. At least the next 2 weeks are St Louis, 2 against Vancouver, 2 against Calgary, and 2 against Edmonton. That should be much more fun to watch.

Absolutely.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBaYVo89mmY

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bron Yr Aur (Post 13077204)
Team simply needs to learn how to play for 60 minutes. Can't be blowing leads left and right like this.

God, just stop talking.

lockman21 11-04-2011 10:02 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
I got to watching Blackhawks YouTube videos. Big mistake. An hour just went away and I have no idea what happened.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaZy4L3fcgI

Bron Yr Aur 11-04-2011 10:27 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 13077208)
Absolutely.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBaYVo89mmY



God, just stop talking.

Say what you will, but we know what this team is capable of. The 2009-10 team blew good teams out routinely. This team is capable of that. Doesn't it bother you that they've blown 2-goal leads in consecutive games?

Their effort tonight was much better than last night, that's for sure. They played pretty well but the defense is definitely a lot weaker without #2. Leddy got Stamkos'd pretty bad for that 3rd Lightning goal and blowing 3rd period leads was something they were pretty damn good at last year.

But I think it's pretty clear that the team is lacking a top-6 winger. Carcillo needs to move back up to the 2nd line so that the offense is a bit more balanced. Toews is carrying a whole lot of dead weight out there in 25 and 15.

DynastyDrummer1 11-04-2011 11:56 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Enroth looked great tonight. Finally lost his shutout streak of 107 minutes, gave up a freak bounce goal.

I'll take it. Glad we finally have a backup that can be relied on.

I expect to see Miller tomorrow at Ottawa though....

lockman21 11-05-2011 06:29 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bron Yr Aur (Post 13077318)
Say what you will, but we know what this team is capable of. The 2009-10 team blew good teams out routinely. This team is capable of that. Doesn't it bother you that they've blown 2-goal leads in consecutive games?

Their effort tonight was much better than last night, that's for sure. They played pretty well but the defense is definitely a lot weaker without #2. Leddy got Stamkos'd pretty bad for that 3rd Lightning goal and blowing 3rd period leads was something they were pretty damn good at last year.

But I think it's pretty clear that the team is lacking a top-6 winger. Carcillo needs to move back up to the 2nd line so that the offense is a bit more balanced. Toews is carrying a whole lot of dead weight out there in 25 and 15.

Good God, just stop. You're making all Hawks fans look bad.

The Stanley Cup season is over. Get over it. Stop referencing it. If you must though, clearly you either jumped on the bandwagon or don't remember how that season started.

The team started clicking, really, in December. And it was essentially the exact same team as the year previous, so everyone knew each other.

This year's team is bonding quickly, but every season starts with some growing pains, especially when half the team is new. Gotta look for the positive signs and this team has PLENTY. They're giving up garbage goals around the net, and fluke turnovers. The garbage goals are an easy fix, and we'll be seeing less of those as the season progresses.

All other signs are pointing that the sky is the limit for this team. It's hard to not be excited if you have a clue.

Bron Yr Aur 11-05-2011 08:12 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 13077514)
Good God, just stop. You're making all Hawks fans look bad.

The Stanley Cup season is over. Get over it. Stop referencing it. If you must though, clearly you either jumped on the bandwagon or don't remember how that season started.

The team started clicking, really, in December. And it was essentially the exact same team as the year previous, so everyone knew each other.

This year's team is bonding quickly, but every season starts with some growing pains, especially when half the team is new. Gotta look for the positive signs and this team has PLENTY. They're giving up garbage goals around the net, and fluke turnovers. The garbage goals are an easy fix, and we'll be seeing less of those as the season progresses.

All other signs are pointing that the sky is the limit for this team. It's hard to not be excited if you have a clue.

Give me a break. The 09-10 team is still a good point of reference. The core is the same, you have the same coaching staff, and the team plays pretty much the same style.

The team is off to a phenomenal start and I'm definitely excited. That said, I still think there are some things lingering from last year that will hopefully get worked out over time.

But c'mon, fluke turnovers? It's called being careless with the puck. It's not a fluke. I thought they did a good job of limiting the turnovers last night but there was definitely some botched coverage on D.

Their record is great at this point, but there is clearly room for improvement.

~Crashintome89~ 11-05-2011 09:05 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bron Yr Aur (Post 13077600)
Give me a break. The 09-10 team is still a good point of reference. The core is the same, you have the same coaching staff, and the team plays pretty much the same style.

Not for us. :lol:lol:lol

bonzo48280 11-05-2011 09:37 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
The 09-10 team didn't go on a tear until their third game in November when they went on an 8 game win streak going into the Circus trip.

October is the worst month to judge a team on. You're trying to figure out your chemistry, trying to get a good idea of lines, and just trying to get the wheels turning. Of course this team needs a lot of improvement, but if this were last years team, you could easily take 4 or 5 of our eight wins and make them losses. This team is finding ways to win while trying to figure out who they are, and they are going to go off. They always do. They are a great team and everything that is going wrong with them is not a matter of not having talent, it's a matter of developing chemistry. So shut up, and just enjoy these wins in while they are coming in.

and if you want to improve the defense, seperate Seabrook and Hjalmarrson for christ's sake.

lockman21 11-05-2011 10:16 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
4-8 should really be paired together. I think 2-8 are what really needs to be separated more so than 4-7, though.

bonzo48280 11-05-2011 10:24 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 13077771)
4-8 should really be paired together. I think 2-8 are what really needs to be separated more so than 4-7, though.

yeah. 4-7 are the best pairing. Still if you go 2-7 4-8 you have a nice top 4

Bron Yr Aur 11-05-2011 11:48 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
I think the D pairings have been working out as of late, but I do not think they work so well when Keith is out and Seabrook and Hjalmarsson have to play top pair minutes. Montador, Lepisto, and O'Donnell have been significantly better than guys like Cullimore, Boynton, and Hendry, though.

bonzo48280 11-05-2011 11:56 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bron Yr Aur (Post 13077985)
I think the D pairings have been working out as of late, but I do not think they work so well when Keith is out and Seabrook and Hjalmarsson have to play top pair minutes. Montador, Lepisto, and O'Donnell have been significantly better than guys like Cullimore, Boynton, and Hendry, though.

ab. so. lut. ley. not.

It makes 0 sense having Leddy and Keith together, and I will keep saying it until they are broken up

DMBCubs25 11-05-2011 01:59 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Leddy and Keith are the EXACT SAME player. You need to pair the players like that, that love to pinch in on offense and carry the puck with a stay-at-home type aka Seabrook or Hammer. D-pairings should be 2 and 7, 4 and 8, 5 and 6/20.

So when will Lou get pulled tomorrow or is Van not even gonna bother starting him?

Bron Yr Aur 11-05-2011 02:04 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
I just think they are pairing Leddy with Keith and Hammer with Seabrook so each of the younger guys is playing with a veteran. Leddy is handling himself well but I don't really like the thought of 4 with 8. Too many mistakes.

You can say what you want, but when the team had the 8-game winning streak last year, Leddy and Keith were paired together. For the start of this season, Leddy and Keith were paired together and we were 7-2-2.

bonzo48280 11-05-2011 02:33 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bron Yr Aur (Post 13078235)
I just think they are pairing Leddy with Keith and Hammer with Seabrook so each of the younger guys is playing with a veteran. Leddy is handling himself well but I don't really like the thought of 4 with 8. Too many mistakes.

You can say what you want, but when the team had the 8-game winning streak last year, Leddy and Keith were paired together. For the start of this season, Leddy and Keith were paired together and we were 7-2-2.

and they aren't even our best pairing....


so you mean to tell me 2-8 4-7 is better than 2-7 4-8?

Not a chance in hell

Bron Yr Aur 11-05-2011 04:25 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bonzo48280 (Post 13078269)
and they aren't even our best pairing....


so you mean to tell me 2-8 4-7 is better than 2-7 4-8?

Not a chance in hell

I don't know because we haven't seen it. 2-7 would always be one of the best 1st pairs in the league. But I haven't seen enough of 4-8 to know. Obviously it looks good on paper. Leddy is the puck mover and Hammer stay-at-home, but they are both prone to youthful mistakes so that's why I think Q is going with Leddy/Keith, Seabrook/Hjalmarsson.

~Crashintome89~ 11-05-2011 04:55 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Columbus is terrible. :lol :lol :lol

bradshaw06 11-05-2011 04:55 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
wowsers, the jackets are awful

~Crashintome89~ 11-05-2011 04:58 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Rick Nash is an amazing human being. How anyone could not ask out of that organization is either as good as Mother Teresa or heavily into drugs.

lockman21 11-05-2011 05:21 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Holy shit Jackets.

lockman21 11-05-2011 05:26 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Christ they are so bad. Mason needs to get out of there or he's going to be ruined forever.

dduncan6er 11-05-2011 05:49 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Seguin with a hat trick against Toronto. Doesn't get much better than that.

kev87lads 11-05-2011 08:30 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Laid the smack down.

Couturier is an 18 year old stud.

rickyh24 11-05-2011 08:49 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Bruins!!! Best!!@!

~Crashintome89~ 11-05-2011 09:47 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
I don't know how Scott Arniel can keep his job after tonight's loss. That was just embarrassing.

dduncan6er 11-05-2011 10:07 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
I wish I could personally thank the reporter who asked kessel about how he felt about seguins hat trick. His reaction was priceless.

DoDaFoo 11-05-2011 10:10 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 13078599)
Christ they are so bad. Mason needs to get out of there or he's going to be ruined forever.

Believe me, CBJ fans want nothing more than to be rid of Mason. The guy had a great rookie year and has never lived up to that again. The first person to go needs to be GM Scott Howson though...


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.14
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All trademarks and copyrights are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest is owned by antsmarching.org.