![]() |
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
And now the NHL cant reach a similar compensation agreement for 18. So because $, but they are selling this as a player safety move, which :lol |
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
but it's the right move by the NHL on literally all fronts. |
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
This will undoubtedly have negative repercussions on CBA agreement. Owners know they will give it back during next round of negotiations, but theyre using it so they can hold on to something else. The only 'front' this was the right move for was for the owners. |
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Also :lol at those polls. 73% in the US against it? yeah sure okay.
|
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
first: because fans have no real reason to be pissed other than to whine about not getting what they want. let's call a spade a spade here. i'm very much pro-NHL for the Olympics, but i can put my selfish emotions aside for a second and see this is the right call for the NHL. second: i don't see how the "relationship" between players and the league can get worse anyway. i mean, 4 lockouts in 23 years kind of says it all. and i really don't think this will cause as much strain as people think. players will huff and puff and threaten to play anyway but a week after the 2018 games it'll be forgotten. Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
same goes for the NFLPA...NFL players have been notoriously bad at negotiating new terms. hard to blame the owners for that. there's plenty of other stuff to blame the owners for, but being good at business is where i'll draw the line. |
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Why don't the fans deserve to have their opinions matter?
I'm also just not really sure that what the league gains by not going is really all that significant either. I mean, it's not like the teams don't play the same amount of games anyway, they've killed the player safety argument with the World Cup, and I fail to see how losing two and a half weeks every four Februarys is really is a big deal. Fair point that things can't get much worse between the league and the NHLPA. edit: all of this is to h2p |
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
Quote:
Just come out and say it's not in their financial best interests. |
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
Bettman isn't just a puppet that walks into a room, polls the owners and goes "duh ok tanks guys! i'll go tell everyone that now". |
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
Sorry owners/Bettman, you can't just screw the pooch and not include that, then realize it, and blame the rest of the world for it. Edit: That's also what I meant - it's not in this CBA. Sorry, but you can't just decide to bargain later. You have an agreement and didn't include the Olympics, stop forcing everyone else to pay for your fuck up. Want to revisit this? Do it when you can opt out in 2019, until then, deal with that the players are going. |
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
having pro players in the Olympics has not helped the game of hockey or the NHL grow AT ALL since it started in 1998, so the casual fan argument is bunk. the league gains a lot by not allowing the players to go, first of which is money. second is not having to shut down the league for 3 weeks (this matters mostly for TV, as they'll lose advertising dollars to the IOC and are not allowed to show Olympics footage during NHL broadcasts). and third is a huge, i mean HUGE, bargaining chip for the next CBA. |
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
i think you're forgetting the "collective" part of collective bargaining agreement. both sides agreed to the current terms of the CBA. |
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
good faith rarely exists in pro sports. not saying that's right or wrong but it's reality. |
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
there's literally no upside for the NHL to let the players go. it's a financial burden to the league and it brings in no new fans or exposure. |
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
Continuing to make that argument is so futile when they have been a part of it since 98 and you know the next CBA will allow it. Those are nothing more than excuses/talking points they are using. This is a bargaining chip and no more. |
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
the only reason players have gone every year since 1998 is because the NHL did not have to bear the financial burden. either the IIHF, IOC, host country, or a combo of the 3 have picked up the financial hit. it's absolutely not an excuse, it's business and again. the Olympics give the NHL zero exposure or new fans |
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
I do not understand how the league gains significantly by not losing 3 weeks in February. The TV advertisements and arena revenues will still be there as all 82 games will be played regardless. It is solely being used as a bargaining chip and makes the NHL look awful. But h2p you are correct that hockey fans will still watch regardless. Just sucks the NHL treats it like this. I get it, it's a business, but it's dumb and it makes the league look really really bad. Again. |
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
This. The gradual growth of the sport is 100% important. This is hurting the NHL in lost opportunity to put the best players on the highest stage of athletics. This is actually money and value being taken away from the league Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
However, they're asking the IOC and IIHF to pay for it. That's the issue. Why the hell would they? The NHL knows they won't, so they're putting impossible demands on it, then saying "well no one wants to talk to us, so guess they aren't going". You know what? I was just typing a metaphor scenario (which I've now replaced with this) and may have talked myself to the other side. I need to think about this more. :lol |
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
Quote:
They couldnt make an exception this one time for the sake of their players and make it work. Its shitty no matter how you try to spin it. I feel most for young guys like Kuznetsov. |
Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
Quote:
That sounds like greed to me. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All trademarks and copyrights are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest is owned by antsmarching.org.