Antsmarching.org Forums

Antsmarching.org Forums (https://www.antsmarching.org/forum/index.php)
-   The Tailgate (https://www.antsmarching.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=93)
-   -   The NHL Thread (https://www.antsmarching.org/forum/showthread.php?t=324692)

TheLastPig 04-04-2017 03:02 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hailtopitt (Post 16759415)
"not pissing off the NHL brand" (whatever that means), isn't a benefit



if a player goes, he will be vulnerable to a breach of contract

whether the team or the NHL does anything about that is another question though.



bolded is wrong. it was collectively bargained before, that's the point

after 94-95 lockout, new CBA included the '98 and '02 Olympics

after '05 lockout, new CBA included a compensation clause for the '06 and '10 Olympics

after '12 lockout, new CBA did not include an Olympics clause. however, the players were allowed to participate in 2014 because there was a compensation agreement reached. Allegedly with the host country and the IIHF.



there's nothing "sudden" about this


And now the NHL cant reach a similar compensation agreement for 18. So because $, but they are selling this as a player safety move, which :lol

hailtopitt 04-04-2017 03:04 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLastPig (Post 16759422)
And now the NHL cant reach a similar compensation agreement for 18. So because $, but they are selling this as a player safety move, which :lol

well of course, they're trying to spin it into some sort of positive, which is dumb

but it's the right move by the NHL on literally all fronts.

barbogast 04-04-2017 03:07 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hailtopitt (Post 16759425)
well of course, they're trying to spin it into some sort of positive, which is dumb

but it's the right move by the NHL on literally all fronts.

Except that it causes strain on the relationships between league and players and league and fans. Though I guess that's unimportant in your opinion.

barbogast 04-04-2017 03:08 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Climb2safety (Post 16759416)
The NHL

https://www.nhl.com/news/nhl-will-no...cs/c-288385598

It's in the middle of the article, I'm not saying it's gospel but maybe gave them the feeling they were in more solid ground.

Yeah I don't buy that. Like at all.

TheLastPig 04-04-2017 03:09 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hailtopitt (Post 16759418)
because Bettman is just doing his job. and really well, i might add.

and i'm no Bettman apologist...but this was 100% the right call for him to make.

Why is it the right call? Just so he doesnt piss off the owners?

This will undoubtedly have negative repercussions on CBA agreement. Owners know they will give it back during next round of negotiations, but theyre using it so they can hold on to something else.

The only 'front' this was the right move for was for the owners.

TheLastPig 04-04-2017 03:13 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Also :lol at those polls. 73% in the US against it? yeah sure okay.

hailtopitt 04-04-2017 03:14 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by barbogast (Post 16759427)
Except that it causes strain on the relationships between league and players and league and fans. Though I guess that's unimportant in your opinion.

in the grand scheme of things, yes, it's unimportant.

first: because fans have no real reason to be pissed other than to whine about not getting what they want. let's call a spade a spade here. i'm very much pro-NHL for the Olympics, but i can put my selfish emotions aside for a second and see this is the right call for the NHL.

second: i don't see how the "relationship" between players and the league can get worse anyway. i mean, 4 lockouts in 23 years kind of says it all. and i really don't think this will cause as much strain as people think.

players will huff and puff and threaten to play anyway but a week after the 2018 games it'll be forgotten.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLastPig (Post 16759432)
Why is it the right call? Just so he doesnt piss off the owners?

well, i guess that's part of it. But mainly because the NHL gets no benefit from letting it's players play. none whatsoever.

hailtopitt 04-04-2017 03:16 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLastPig (Post 16759432)
This will undoubtedly have negative repercussions on CBA agreement. Owners know they will give it back during next round of negotiations, but theyre using it so they can hold on to something else.

well, that's how you collectively bargain. not gonna blame the league for being good at it. NHL players need to be better at it.

same goes for the NFLPA...NFL players have been notoriously bad at negotiating new terms. hard to blame the owners for that.

there's plenty of other stuff to blame the owners for, but being good at business is where i'll draw the line.

Climb2safety 04-04-2017 03:19 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by barbogast (Post 16759431)
Yeah I don't buy that. Like at all.

What about the stats they say suggest that the team with the most olympians is the easiest playoff out. That also smells like total bullshit.

barbogast 04-04-2017 03:21 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Why don't the fans deserve to have their opinions matter?

I'm also just not really sure that what the league gains by not going is really all that significant either. I mean, it's not like the teams don't play the same amount of games anyway, they've killed the player safety argument with the World Cup, and I fail to see how losing two and a half weeks every four Februarys is really is a big deal.

Fair point that things can't get much worse between the league and the NHLPA.

edit: all of this is to h2p

Climb2safety 04-04-2017 03:21 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Brohan_Santana (Post 16759410)
This is 100% on Bettman. Not sure why people think it's not...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You don't put any blame on the collection of owners?

barbogast 04-04-2017 03:22 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Climb2safety (Post 16759447)
What about the stats they say suggest that the team with the most olympians is the easiest playoff out. That also smells like total bullshit.

I haven't seen said stats but I would be interested to

jrkarger 04-04-2017 03:27 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLastPig (Post 16759422)
And now the NHL cant reach a similar compensation agreement for 18. So because $, but they are selling this as a player safety move, which :lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by hailtopitt (Post 16759425)
well of course, they're trying to spin it into some sort of positive, which is dumb

This is probably my biggest complaint is the BS spin.

Just come out and say it's not in their financial best interests.

lockman21 04-04-2017 03:28 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hailtopitt (Post 16759418)
because Bettman is just doing his job. and really well, i might add.

and i'm no Bettman apologist...but this was 100% the right call for him to make.

This still makes absolutely 0 sense. If this is the result of him "doing his job", then he absolutely shares blame here.

Bettman isn't just a puppet that walks into a room, polls the owners and goes "duh ok tanks guys! i'll go tell everyone that now".

Climb2safety 04-04-2017 03:29 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by barbogast (Post 16759456)
I haven't seen said stats but I would be interested to

In the same article

lockman21 04-04-2017 03:30 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hailtopitt (Post 16759415)
after '12 lockout, new CBA did not include an Olympics clause. however, the players were allowed to participate in 2014 because there was a compensation agreement reached. Allegedly with the host country and the IIHF.

And who's fault is that, exactly?

Sorry owners/Bettman, you can't just screw the pooch and not include that, then realize it, and blame the rest of the world for it.

Edit: That's also what I meant - it's not in this CBA. Sorry, but you can't just decide to bargain later. You have an agreement and didn't include the Olympics, stop forcing everyone else to pay for your fuck up. Want to revisit this? Do it when you can opt out in 2019, until then, deal with that the players are going.

hailtopitt 04-04-2017 03:30 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by barbogast (Post 16759452)
Why don't the fans deserve to have their opinions matter?

I'm also just not really sure that what the league gains by not going is really all that significant either. I mean, it's not like the teams don't play the same amount of games anyway, they've killed the player safety argument with the World Cup, and I fail to see how losing two and a half weeks every four Februarys is really is a big deal.

Fair point that things can't get much worse between the league and the NHLPA.

edit: all of this is to h2p

the fans do deserve to have their opinions heard, but they don't deserve to have a say in how the league is run. hockey fans will keep watching no matter what and the NHL knows that.

having pro players in the Olympics has not helped the game of hockey or the NHL grow AT ALL since it started in 1998, so the casual fan argument is bunk.

the league gains a lot by not allowing the players to go, first of which is money. second is not having to shut down the league for 3 weeks (this matters mostly for TV, as they'll lose advertising dollars to the IOC and are not allowed to show Olympics footage during NHL broadcasts). and third is a huge, i mean HUGE, bargaining chip for the next CBA.

TheLastPig 04-04-2017 03:31 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hailtopitt (Post 16759443)
well, that's how you collectively bargain. not gonna blame the league for being good at it. NHL players need to be better at it.

same goes for the NFLPA...NFL players have been notoriously bad at negotiating new terms. hard to blame the owners for that.

there's plenty of other stuff to blame the owners for, but being good at business is where i'll draw the line.

I mean, theres a clear reason beyond players associations need to "be better", owners have ALL the leverage in professional sport, this is just a showcase of it. God forbid something be done in good faith.

hailtopitt 04-04-2017 03:32 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jrkarger (Post 16759464)
This is probably my biggest complaint is the BS spin.

Just come out and say it's not in their financial best interests.

i'm with you there :thumbsup

Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 16759466)
This still makes absolutely 0 sense. If this is the result of him "doing his job", then he absolutely shares blame here.

Bettman isn't just a puppet that walks into a room, polls the owners and goes "duh ok tanks guys! i'll go tell everyone that now".

Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 16759470)
And who's fault is that, exactly?

Sorry owners/Bettman, you can't just screw the pooch and not include that, then realize it, and blame the rest of the world for it.

Edit: That's also what I meant - it's not in this CBA. Sorry, but you can't just decide to bargain later. You have an agreement and didn't include the Olympics, stop forcing everyone else to pay for your fuck up.

i really don't know what you're talking about. i'm sorry, i'm trying to follow you but i just can't.

i think you're forgetting the "collective" part of collective bargaining agreement. both sides agreed to the current terms of the CBA.

lockman21 04-04-2017 03:33 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hailtopitt (Post 16759471)
the fans do deserve to have their opinions heard, but they don't deserve to have a say in how the league is run. hockey fans will keep watching no matter what and the NHL knows that.

having pro players in the Olympics has not helped the game of hockey or the NHL grow AT ALL since it started in 1998, so the casual fan argument is bunk.

the league gains a lot by not allowing the players to go, first of which is money. second is not having to shut down the league for 3 weeks (this matters mostly for TV, as they'll lose advertising dollars to the IOC and are not allowed to show Olympics footage during NHL broadcasts). and third is a huge, i mean HUGE, bargaining chip for the next CBA.

You're not wrong there.

Climb2safety 04-04-2017 03:33 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hailtopitt (Post 16759471)
the fans do deserve to have their opinions heard, but they don't deserve to have a say in how the league is run. hockey fans will keep watching no matter what and the NHL knows that.

having pro players in the Olympics has not helped the game of hockey or the NHL grow AT ALL since it started in 1998, so the casual fan argument is bunk.

the league gains a lot by not allowing the players to go, first of which is money. second is not having to shut down the league for 3 weeks (this matters mostly for TV, as they'll lose advertising dollars to the IOC and are not allowed to show Olympics footage during NHL broadcasts). and third is a huge, i mean HUGE, bargaining chip for the next CBA.

I just don't see how they can stop players from going. No upside, all downside for the NHL.

hailtopitt 04-04-2017 03:34 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLastPig (Post 16759472)
I mean, theres a clear reason beyond players associations need to "be better", owners have ALL the leverage in professional sport, this is just a showcase of it. God forbid something be done in good faith.

sorry but i'm not with you on the bolded. it's a business and the players should know better.

good faith rarely exists in pro sports. not saying that's right or wrong but it's reality.

hailtopitt 04-04-2017 03:35 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Climb2safety (Post 16759477)
I just don't see how they can stop players from going. No upside, all downside for the NHL.

but, as i've just laid out over the last couple pages, it's the exact opposite.

there's literally no upside for the NHL to let the players go.

it's a financial burden to the league and it brings in no new fans or exposure.

TheLastPig 04-04-2017 03:38 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hailtopitt (Post 16759481)
but, as i've just laid out over the last couple pages, it's the exact opposite.

there's literally no upside for the NHL to let the players go.

it's a financial burden to the league and it brings in no new fans or exposure.


Continuing to make that argument is so futile when they have been a part of it since 98 and you know the next CBA will allow it. Those are nothing more than excuses/talking points they are using.

This is a bargaining chip and no more.

hailtopitt 04-04-2017 03:42 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLastPig (Post 16759487)
Continuing to make that argument is so futile when they have been a part of it since 98 and you know the next CBA will allow it. Those are nothing more than excuses/talking points they are using.

This is a bargaining chip and no more.

that's not true at all though

the only reason players have gone every year since 1998 is because the NHL did not have to bear the financial burden. either the IIHF, IOC, host country, or a combo of the 3 have picked up the financial hit.

it's absolutely not an excuse, it's business

and again. the Olympics give the NHL zero exposure or new fans

barbogast 04-04-2017 03:47 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLastPig (Post 16759487)
Continuing to make that argument is so futile when they have been a part of it since 98 and you know the next CBA will allow it. Those are nothing more than excuses/talking points they are using.

This is a bargaining chip and no more.

Agreed.

I do not understand how the league gains significantly by not losing 3 weeks in February. The TV advertisements and arena revenues will still be there as all 82 games will be played regardless.

It is solely being used as a bargaining chip and makes the NHL look awful.

But h2p you are correct that hockey fans will still watch regardless. Just sucks the NHL treats it like this. I get it, it's a business, but it's dumb and it makes the league look really really bad. Again.

Brohan_Santana 04-04-2017 03:48 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by barbogast (Post 16759427)
Except that it causes strain on the relationships between league and players and league and fans. Though I guess that's unimportant in your opinion.



This.

The gradual growth of the sport is 100% important. This is hurting the NHL in lost opportunity to put the best players on the highest stage of athletics. This is actually money and value being taken away from the league


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

lockman21 04-04-2017 03:48 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hailtopitt (Post 16759475)
i really don't know what you're talking about. i'm sorry, i'm trying to follow you but i just can't.

i think you're forgetting the "collective" part of collective bargaining agreement. both sides agreed to the current terms of the CBA.

Right - which doesn't have an Olympics clause. A.k.a. the players can go. The NHL might interpret that as "well, it doesn't say they CAN'T go", while the NHLPA is interpreting that as "well, they can go".

However, they're asking the IOC and IIHF to pay for it. That's the issue. Why the hell would they? The NHL knows they won't, so they're putting impossible demands on it, then saying "well no one wants to talk to us, so guess they aren't going".

You know what? I was just typing a metaphor scenario (which I've now replaced with this) and may have talked myself to the other side. I need to think about this more. :lol

TheLastPig 04-04-2017 03:51 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hailtopitt (Post 16759491)
that's not true at all though

the only reason players have gone every year since 1998 is because the NHL did not have to bear the financial burden. either the IIHF, IOC, host country, or a combo of the 3 have picked up the financial hit.

it's absolutely not an excuse, it's business

and again. the Olympics give the NHL zero exposure or new fans

Quote:

Originally Posted by barbogast (Post 16759503)
Agreed.

I do not understand how the league gains significantly by not losing 3 weeks in February. The TV advertisements and arena revenues will still be there as all 82 games will be played regardless.

It is solely being used as a bargaining chip and makes the NHL look awful.

But h2p you are correct that hockey fans will still watch regardless. Just sucks the NHL treats it like this. I get it, it's a business, but it's dumb and it makes the league look really really bad. Again.

It all just boils down to money and the NHL being the same shitty NHL we know.

They couldnt make an exception this one time for the sake of their players and make it work. Its shitty no matter how you try to spin it.

I feel most for young guys like Kuznetsov.

Climb2safety 04-04-2017 03:54 PM

Re: The NHL Thread (where home field advantage matters!)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hailtopitt (Post 16759481)
but, as i've just laid out over the last couple pages, it's the exact opposite.

there's literally no upside for the NHL to let the players go.

it's a financial burden to the league and it brings in no new fans or exposure.

But also the NHL isn't getting paid right? The NHL wanted the IOC to give them a portion of the revenues this year and the IOC offered the same deal as last time and the NHL said not enough.

That sounds like greed to me.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All trademarks and copyrights are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest is owned by antsmarching.org.