Antsmarching.org Forums

Antsmarching.org Forums (https://www.antsmarching.org/forum/index.php)
-   The Tailgate (https://www.antsmarching.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=93)
-   -   The NHL Thread (https://www.antsmarching.org/forum/showthread.php?t=324692)

lockman21 07-18-2016 10:46 AM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lcsulla (Post 16520566)
Yeah a solid blue line is absolutely critical to a teams success and I think Pittsburgh has a pretty solid one. That said, the expansion draft is going to be a royal pain for team that have good blue liners because they will likely have to expose all but 3. Much like your Penguins I am damn happy with Chicago's blue line:

Keith/TVR
Seabrook/Hjarlmasson
Campbell/Svedberg

add in Rozsival and Ehrhoff for injuries, spot situations and filling in if someone ends up on the injured reserve list and I am pretty confident with the Hawks D. No real concerns about their offense at all but I am really hoping Crawford can start avoiding his periodic brainfarts in net!

I would be SHOCKED if -

1) Ehrhoff was resigned by the Hawks
2) Svedberg plays in the NHL for more than 10-20 games (mostly for injury fill in)
3) Campbell plays on the bottom pair
4) Kempny isn't on the opening day roster

It'll likely be more like this -

Keith - Hjalmarsson
Campbell - Seabrook
Kempny - TVR
Roszival

With Pokka and Svedberg being call-ups if needed.

fonzz41 07-18-2016 10:48 AM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by trd1610 (Post 16519720)
Lightning sign Alex Killorn to a 7 year deal, $4.45 million per year. He was phenomenal in the playoffs and is really an underrated part of the team. 7 years is a long commitment but the money isn't egregious by any means for a 26 year old who seems to be just emerging into the player he can be.

Stevie Y does it again. Great signing.

TMoore4075 07-18-2016 11:10 AM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
If Kilorn gets 4.5 what is Kuch gonna get and Johnson next year?

Lcsulla 07-18-2016 11:23 AM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 16520614)
I would be SHOCKED if -

1) Ehrhoff was resigned by the Hawks
2) Svedberg plays in the NHL for more than 10-20 games (mostly for injury fill in)
3) Campbell plays on the bottom pair
4) Kempny isn't on the opening day roster

It'll likely be more like this -

Keith - Hjalmarsson
Campbell - Seabrook
Kempny - TVR
Roszival

With Pokka and Svedberg being call-ups if needed.

Agreed on Erhoff, I too doubt he remains in Chicago.
Unsure about Kempny to be honest, Hawks have a deep D so he may not be on the opening day roster.
I agree Campbell should be on the first or second D pairing but I think given his status as a vet having him on a line with young guys like Svedberg or TVR would be very beneficial to their development.

Regardless though - Keith is going to anchor the first pairing and Seabrook will anchor the second pairing (and BOTH will likely be on the ice together during PP's) regardless of who they are paired with.

lockman21 07-18-2016 11:29 AM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Kempny will almost certainly be on the opening day roster. Dude was a KHL stud, came over here with the expectation he plays in the NHL, not the AHL. I'm guessing he was all but guaranteed a spot on the roster when he signed kind of like Panarin was.

He's going to be really good.

lockman21 07-18-2016 11:44 AM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TMoore4075 (Post 16520650)
If Kilorn gets 4.5 what is Kuch gonna get and Johnson next year?

Johnson is so interesting...curious where he lands.

Still can't believe they got Stammer for only 8.5. Blows my mind.

TMoore4075 07-18-2016 12:05 PM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 16520722)
Johnson is so interesting...curious where he lands.

Still can't believe they got Stammer for only 8.5. Blows my mind.

He knew what the only $ they could get offer was. While his cap hit seems low, those state taxes do play into what he actually gets plus an 8th year. If Detroit or Buffalo gave him 10.5mil, he'd only take home like 500k more per year than he's taking home in TB and Tampa could give an 8th year so he's making about $2mil more overall in Tampa than he could have gotten in either of those two places at a 10.5mil cap hit.

kev87lads 07-18-2016 12:18 PM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Crashintome89~ (Post 16520349)
God damn, Kev were you at SPAC N2?

I was!

I still maintain that my personal preference was N1. But both were VERY good and couldn't go wrong.

There were songs in N1 that I enjoy and haven't heard in awhile that push over the top for me. First three songs in N2 were just amazing, even though Last Stop was kind of a mess for the first 5 minutes. And I just don't hold Two Step and Halloween in the same regard as others so it doesn't push it past N1 for me.

Missing Jimi though was really a win for everyone there and the world.

lockman21 07-18-2016 12:32 PM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TMoore4075 (Post 16520795)
He knew what the only $ they could get offer was. While his cap hit seems low, those state taxes do play into what he actually gets plus an 8th year. If Detroit or Buffalo gave him 10.5mil, he'd only take home like 500k more per year than he's taking home in TB and Tampa could give an 8th year so he's making about $2mil more overall in Tampa than he could have gotten in either of those two places at a 10.5mil cap hit.

Where did you see that? I have a hard time believing that's accurate, since the state taxes are taken out based on where you play. Over the course of a 7 year contract, he'd only have an extra $1,561,875 taken out in Michigan considering Michigan's state income is 4.25%. He'd make up that difference in no time, plus whatever he'd get paid in the 8th year when he signs another contract.

10.5*7 = 73,500,000 - 1561875 = $71,938,125
8.5*8 = 68,000,000

Math for reference - 10,500,000*.0425=$446,250/2(home games in Michigan)=223,125*8(years)=$1,561,875

lockman21 07-18-2016 12:40 PM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
So for consistency's sake, if we look at a "per year" basis -

10.5*7 = 71,938,125 = 10,276,875 per year
8.5*7 (with no state income for FLA home games) = 59,500,000 = still 8.5 per year...so another 1.77m per year

I have no idea where you read that 500k number, but it's not right.

TMoore4075 07-18-2016 12:55 PM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 16520881)
Where did you see that? I have a hard time believing that's accurate, since the state taxes are taken out based on where you play. Over the course of a 7 year contract, he'd only have an extra $1,561,875 taken out in Michigan considering Michigan's state income is 4.25%. He'd make up that difference in no time, plus whatever he'd get paid in the 8th year when he signs another contract.

10.5*7 = 73,500,000 - 1561875 = $71,938,125
8.5*8 = 68,000,000

Math for reference - 10,500,000*.0425=$446,250/2(home games in Michigan)=223,125*8(years)=$1,561,875

Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 16520912)
So for consistency's sake, if we look at a "per year" basis -

10.5*7 = 71,938,125 = 10,276,875 per year
8.5*7 (with no state income for FLA home games) = 59,500,000 = still 8.5 per year...so another 1.77m per year

I have no idea where you read that 500k number, but it's not right.

https://www.capfriendly.com/post_tax_calculator

That's including all taxes federal and state.

10.5mil per year in Detroit after all taxes: 5.6mi per year for 7 years= 39.2mil

8.5mil per year in TB: 5.1mil per year for 8 years=40.8mil.

So even though his cap hit would be higher in Detroit, he's making more in Tampa at a lower cap hit.

trd1610 07-18-2016 02:14 PM

The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TMoore4075 (Post 16520650)
If Kilorn gets 4.5 what is Kuch gonna get and Johnson next year?



I prefer Kucherov to Johnson, I just think he's a better player. He'll probably be asking for 6-7 range. If we can lock him up for 6x6.5 or something like that I'd be happy. They've got about 8.5 of space left right now after the Killorn deal.

Palat and Drouin are also RFA in 17-18 with Johnson. We have $19 million in projected space. Johnson would get more than Palat, close to what Killorn signs for. Palat probably 5-5.5 million. I'm not so sure of what type of offer Drouin would be looking at. I trust in Yzerman to know which guys he can keep and who may have to walk or get moved.

lockman21 07-18-2016 02:32 PM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TMoore4075 (Post 16520961)
https://www.capfriendly.com/post_tax_calculator

That's including all taxes federal and state.

10.5mil per year in Detroit after all taxes: 5.6mi per year for 7 years= 39.2mil

8.5mil per year in TB: 5.1mil per year for 8 years=40.8mil.

So even though his cap hit would be higher in Detroit, he's making more in Tampa at a lower cap hit.

Interesting...I'm not sure how accurate that is. I just sent them an email, as it seems they are just comparing 1 vs 1 for tax rates. For example, check out Andrew McCutchen's pay stub:

http://www.totalprosports.com/wp-con...pay-stub-2.jpg

See how he's had state income taken out in Illinois, Missouri, etc.? Because everything is "per game", when he plays home games there, that's where taxes are taken out.

TMoore4075 07-18-2016 02:40 PM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 16521238)
Interesting...I'm not sure how accurate that is. I just sent them an email, as it seems they are just comparing 1 vs 1 for tax rates. For example, check out Andrew McCutchen's pay stub:

http://www.totalprosports.com/wp-con...pay-stub-2.jpg

See how he's had state income taken out in Illinois, Missouri, etc.? Because everything is "per game", when he plays home games there, that's where taxes are taken out.

The per game thing is interesting, especially when you get into some of these more recent NHL contracts where a large portion of the contracts are being paid in signing bonuses. If you get a large sum of it at once do you still get taxed at a per game basis? Stammer will get 9.5mil this year and 8.5mil of it is a signing bonus so his salary is actually only 1mil cause he's already got the 8.5mil up front.

fonzz41 07-18-2016 02:42 PM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Interesting trade, Rangers sending Brassard to OTT for Zibenejad.

http://nhl.nbcsports.com/2016/07/18/...for-zibanejad/

Brassard quietly had a great last season for the Rags (I only noticed because he was on my fantasy team), so that's a solid pickup for the Sens. However, Zibenejad is rounding out into a really solid player as well and is a bit younger.

TMoore4075 07-18-2016 02:44 PM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fonzz41 (Post 16521283)
Interesting trade, Rangers sending Brassard to OTT for Zibenejad.

http://nhl.nbcsports.com/2016/07/18/...for-zibanejad/

Brassard quietly had a great last season for the Rags (I only noticed because he was on my fantasy team), so that's a solid pickup for the Sens. However, Zibenejad is rounding out into a really solid player as well and is a bit younger.

Rangers dump some salary over 3 years which is good for them. When everything is all said and done in a few years I think the Rangers win. Got rid of the salary and added a younger player.

fonzz41 07-18-2016 02:48 PM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
And when was the last time the Rangers got YOUNGER after a trade? ;)

TMoore4075 07-18-2016 02:49 PM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fonzz41 (Post 16521302)
And when was the last time the Rangers got YOUNGER after a trade? ;)

1989?? Just guessing though. ;)

hailtopitt 07-18-2016 02:50 PM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fonzz41 (Post 16521302)
And when was the last time the Rangers got YOUNGER after a trade? ;)

:lol so true

unccrombie 07-18-2016 02:54 PM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fonzz41 (Post 16521302)
And when was the last time the Rangers got YOUNGER after a trade? ;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by TMoore4075 (Post 16521306)
1989?? Just guessing though. ;)

:lol
I don't hate the trade, but will miss DB.

fonzz41 07-18-2016 02:58 PM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by unccrombie (Post 16521316)
:lol
I don't hate the trade, but will miss DB.

He was really underrated, TBH. Started out pretty one-dimensional, but I thought he'd really rounded out his game the last couple seasons.

However, Zibenejad has a ton of upside. Plays hard and has the skill to match. Good trade for the Rags.

lockman21 07-18-2016 03:13 PM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TMoore4075 (Post 16521271)
The per game thing is interesting, especially when you get into some of these more recent NHL contracts where a large portion of the contracts are being paid in signing bonuses. If you get a large sum of it at once do you still get taxed at a per game basis? Stammer will get 9.5mil this year and 8.5mil of it is a signing bonus so his salary is actually only 1mil cause he's already got the 8.5mil up front.

Yeah...that changes a lot, too, since I'm sure that signing bonus is based in Florida so no state income tax on that...

Since when was hockey so much about math? :lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by fonzz41 (Post 16521283)
Interesting trade, Rangers sending Brassard to OTT for Zibenejad.

http://nhl.nbcsports.com/2016/07/18/...for-zibanejad/

Brassard quietly had a great last season for the Rags (I only noticed because he was on my fantasy team), so that's a solid pickup for the Sens. However, Zibenejad is rounding out into a really solid player as well and is a bit younger.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TMoore4075 (Post 16521291)
Rangers dump some salary over 3 years which is good for them. When everything is all said and done in a few years I think the Rangers win. Got rid of the salary and added a younger player.

At what point do the Rags move Hank? I mean, what if they traded him for someone like Lehtonen and a couple first round picks? They clearly aren't winning the Stanley Cup this year (Rangers). Do they realize their window to win one with Hank is closed so they move him to a team with some cap space that's basically a goalie away from being a real SC contender? Maybe to the (gulp) Islanders for Halak, Michael Dal Colle, and a first? Maybe Nashville retains some salary for Rinne, sends him and Kevin Fiala over and a first?

unccrombie 07-18-2016 03:19 PM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 16521366)
At what point do the Rags move Hank? I mean, what if they traded him for someone like Lehtonen and a couple first round picks? They clearly aren't winning the Stanley Cup this year (Rangers). Do they realize their window to win one with Hank is closed so they move him to a team with some cap space that's basically a goalie away from being a real SC contender? Maybe to the (gulp) Islanders for Halak, Michael Dal Colle, and a first? Maybe Nashville retains some salary for Rinne, sends him and Kevin Fiala over and a first?

I don't think Hank gets moved anywhere in the Metro. Rangers will likely deal him to a team that's a contender, like you said, much like Ryan Miller. I was ready to start over once Talbot started showing signs of competency. Sucks to say, but it'll have to happen at some point. I don't want to see him fizzle like Marty.

fonzz41 07-18-2016 03:23 PM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 16521366)
At what point do the Rags move Hank? I mean, what if they traded him for someone like Lehtonen and a couple first round picks? They clearly aren't winning the Stanley Cup this year (Rangers). Do they realize their window to win one with Hank is closed so they move him to a team with some cap space that's basically a goalie away from being a real SC contender? Maybe to the (gulp) Islanders for Halak, Michael Dal Colle, and a first? Maybe Nashville retains some salary for Rinne, sends him and Kevin Fiala over and a first?

You have to think it's crossed their mind, right? Honestly, it seems difficult to move goaltenders right now. Especially highly-paid ones.

I'll be honest, I haven't even thought about it until right now, but the possibility of him coming to the Avs is slightly intriguing. I love Varly, but I think if Pickard continues to develop, he's our guy of the future. But still, we could use an established vet for another couple seasons probably. Would be kinda cool to trade Varly and a prospect to NYR for Hank, have Hank start for a couple seasons in COL and be a good example for Pickard, and then Pickard take the reigns.

Two concerns: Money, which isn't all that bad if we move Varly and have Iggy come off the books. And time. Hank is still at an age where he COULD potentially have 4-5 years left in him. In most scenarios, that would be a GOOD thing; in the one I outlined above, that's almost TOO much time, you know? I would think Pickard would be ready to start in 2 seasons... and I'd hate to have an $8 million (or whatever his salary is) whale sitting on the bench.

TMoore4075 07-18-2016 03:25 PM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
5 more years of him at 8.5mil is a lot and most of it is actually salary. Hard for a team to take that on when it's not just cap hit. I'd say he could retire early but he's still making $7mil in his 2nd to last year. He's not leaving that on the table.

lockman21 07-18-2016 04:37 PM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by unccrombie (Post 16521381)
I don't think Hank gets moved anywhere in the Metro. Rangers will likely deal him to a team that's a contender, like you said, much like Ryan Miller. I was ready to start over once Talbot started showing signs of competency. Sucks to say, but it'll have to happen at some point. I don't want to see him fizzle like Marty.

Quote:

Originally Posted by fonzz41 (Post 16521394)
You have to think it's crossed their mind, right? Honestly, it seems difficult to move goaltenders right now. Especially highly-paid ones.

I'll be honest, I haven't even thought about it until right now, but the possibility of him coming to the Avs is slightly intriguing. I love Varly, but I think if Pickard continues to develop, he's our guy of the future. But still, we could use an established vet for another couple seasons probably. Would be kinda cool to trade Varly and a prospect to NYR for Hank, have Hank start for a couple seasons in COL and be a good example for Pickard, and then Pickard take the reigns.

Two concerns: Money, which isn't all that bad if we move Varly and have Iggy come off the books. And time. Hank is still at an age where he COULD potentially have 4-5 years left in him. In most scenarios, that would be a GOOD thing; in the one I outlined above, that's almost TOO much time, you know? I would think Pickard would be ready to start in 2 seasons... and I'd hate to have an $8 million (or whatever his salary is) whale sitting on the bench.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TMoore4075 (Post 16521400)
5 more years of him at 8.5mil is a lot and most of it is actually salary. Hard for a team to take that on when it's not just cap hit. I'd say he could retire early but he's still making $7mil in his 2nd to last year. He's not leaving that on the table.

I had a whole long reply to this, then accidentally closed the tab :BANG

But short version - maybe that's where Nashville makes the most sense? Team is ready to contend for the Cup now, and Hank is a clear upgrade over Rinne. If they move Fiala to join Zibenejad in NY, the Rags have some solid building blocks for the future without having to go through the hard "overhaul" stage, still have a solid goaltender, get some money off the books in the future, etc. If Nashville retains a couple mil for Rinne, then they REALLY have some money off the books, and meanwhile, Nashville (IMO) becomes the immediate favorite in the West.

salrx95 07-18-2016 10:15 PM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fonzz41 (Post 16521302)
And when was the last time the Rangers got YOUNGER after a trade? ;)

That's great.

fonzz41 07-18-2016 11:48 PM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by salrx95 (Post 16522042)
That's great.

I dedicate that post to you, Sal.

salrx95 07-19-2016 08:05 AM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fonzz41 (Post 16522208)
I dedicate that post to you, Sal.

It was my birthday yesterday and that line was my favorite present. Thanks.

Don't need a bunch of wishes now. Thanks in advance. When you get to my age, we don't acknowledge them anyways :D:lorraine

barbogast 07-19-2016 08:51 AM

Re: The NHL Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fonzz41 (Post 16521302)
And when was the last time the Rangers got YOUNGER after a trade? ;)

:lol :lol

Happy bday, Sal


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All trademarks and copyrights are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest is owned by antsmarching.org.