Antsmarching.org Forums - Dave Matthews Band Discussion

Antsmarching.org Forums - Dave Matthews Band Discussion (https://www.antsmarching.org/forum/index.php)
-   nDMBc Discussion (https://www.antsmarching.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   *Prompter Thread* (NO personal attacks, NO trolling) (https://www.antsmarching.org/forum/showthread.php?t=343913)

BTBaboon 10-22-2020 08:36 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Route_2 (Post 17811334)
A little shocked he doesn't deploy this more given how well it worked for Obama.

He said it last debate, too, I believe. And he's used it on the campaign trail quite a bit.

Dannyyankou 10-22-2020 08:37 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BTBaboon (Post 17811335)
These unscientific online polls in the wake of debates are the biggest garbage in political journalism.


Don’t get me started on Twitter polls. All of your followers who are in your preferred candidate’s base are going to give you the result you want.

BruceW 10-22-2020 08:42 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dannyyankou (Post 17811331)
Hannity showed an unscientific online poll showing Trump won 74% lol


Actually surprised it isn’t 100% considering where Hannity likely pulled it from

UNLTrpt 10-22-2020 08:43 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Route_2 (Post 17811326)

:lol su-penis

Route_2 10-22-2020 08:44 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BTBaboon (Post 17811337)
He said it last debate, too, I believe. And he's used it on the campaign trail quite a bit.

Ok, cool. I guess I'm just missing it.

TablesTurnAgain 10-22-2020 08:46 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
I thought another strong Biden moment is after Trump tried saying he was a socialist like Bernie, and he responded by saying “You must be confused, I’m Joe Biden, I defeated the people who proposed the ideas you’re attacking” or something to that effect

drakan 10-22-2020 08:47 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Tiny little windows:lol

EDIT:

And his knock down buildings spiel is stupid. No environmentalist wants to knock down buildings. Environmentalists are trying to save buildings and save all of that embedded carbon. The retrofit of the Empire State building is also what environmentalist want to do.

drakan 10-22-2020 08:50 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TablesTurnAgain (Post 17811347)
I thought another strong Biden moment is after Trump tried saying he was a socialist like Bernie, and he responded by saying “You must be confused, I’m Joe Biden, I defeated the people who proposed the ideas you’re attacking” or something to that effect

Meanwhile Trump is about to give seniors $200. Plus he's shoveled over $10 billion to farmers.

Dannyyankou 10-22-2020 08:52 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Biggest surprise of the night is there was no mention by Trump of court packing. Probably because Biden actually has an answer now that would probably be very popular if people were polled on it.

Dannyyankou 10-22-2020 09:05 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
View on both candidates virtually unchanged in CNN poll, which is a win for Biden

https://twitter.com/Politics_Polls/s...88035348774918

~Crashintome89~ 10-22-2020 09:05 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cazzie34 (Post 17811333)
Trump didn't mention voter fraud etc.

Little victories, folks.


Yeah, that's interesting, but I think it doesn't matter anymore. Early voting numbers across the country are up substantially from what they were in 2016. For Trump to attack mail in voting now won't work because it doesn't matter anymore with two weeks being out from Election Day.

drakan 10-22-2020 09:15 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Crashintome89~ (Post 17811358)
Yeah, that's interesting, but I think it doesn't matter anymore. Early voting numbers across the country are up substantially from what they were in 2016. For Trump to attack mail in voting now won't work because it doesn't matter anymore with two weeks being out from Election Day.

Trump drove people to early voting with his attack on the mail system.

ExistenceNow 10-22-2020 09:17 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Just got home from work and am catching up on the debate. Biden is hard to watch.

bradshaw06 10-22-2020 09:24 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Maybe strangest attack of the night was trump going birther in biden saying he isnt even from scranton. So weird.

drakan 10-22-2020 09:26 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ExistenceNow (Post 17811363)
Just got home from work and am catching up on the debate. Biden is hard to watch.

It was almost his bed time.

drakan 10-22-2020 09:33 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bradshaw06 (Post 17811365)
Maybe strangest attack of the night was trump going birther in biden saying he isnt even from scranton. So weird.

Looking over his wikipedia page it seems he moved when he was 11. So yeah weird.

I didn't know that Biden played football and baseball.

Also we are on a pretty good run of president with some Irish ancestry.

Reagan
HW Bush
W
Obama
maybe Biden

ExistenceNow 10-22-2020 10:01 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
So this debate made it pretty obvious that Trump can't run against Joe Biden. He's running against Bernie, Hillary, Obama, AOC... so he just has to convince the country that Joe is them. Imagine falling for that.

kydmb99 10-22-2020 10:06 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
I’m sure this has been mentioned but man Kristen Welker was great tonight. Like seriously well done. Definitely a rising star.

ExistenceNow 10-22-2020 10:12 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
I mean, she did well but how much of that was because Trump's team told him to rein that shit it? If he'd have just refused to shut the fuck up like he did last time, how would she have done?

JRS1386 10-22-2020 10:13 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ExistenceNow (Post 17811374)
So this debate made it pretty obvious that Trump can't run against Joe Biden. He's running against Bernie, Hillary, Obama, AOC... so he just has to convince the country that Joe is them. Imagine falling for that.

He's also running against Hunter

kydmb99 10-22-2020 10:15 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ExistenceNow (Post 17811374)
So this debate made it pretty obvious that Trump can't run against Joe Biden. He's running against Bernie, Hillary, Obama, AOC... so he just has to convince the country that Joe is them. Imagine falling for that.

Yes Hillary was terrible at trying to fein giving a shit about people whereas empathy is probably Joe’s strength

ExistenceNow 10-22-2020 10:24 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kydmb99 (Post 17811379)
Yes Hillary was terrible at trying to fein giving a shit about people whereas empathy is probably Joe’s strength


Eh... I see what you're saying but I think it's a matter of different love languages. Joe will give you a hug and tell you he cares. Hillary was willing to fuck some shit up to fight for you; no time for hugs.

My love language is more aligned with the latter.

Antiramie 10-22-2020 10:29 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kydmb99 (Post 17811379)
Yes Hillary was terrible at trying to fein giving a shit about people whereas empathy is probably Joe’s strength

Hillary is just weird as fuck. She just didn't connect with many people on a human level, including myself. Though I did vote for her.

Route_2 10-22-2020 10:39 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Some of the replies in this thread are hilarious.

@jelani9
Ok, I’ll start: People who did more for black America than Donald Trump.
https://twitter.com/jelani9/status/1319464142860857344

Antiramie 10-22-2020 10:49 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Just got done backreading:

1. mdmarvich beat muskie's meat

2. Maybe the coyote ate your baby!

3. Can't believe I missed a malarkey moment. Fuck.

4. Look forward to all the lunacy in this thread on election night!

neumdogg 10-22-2020 11:16 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by coldengrey12 (Post 17811291)
Whew! Rough run here for ol' CG12!

I'm gonna go back to the AOTD thread where it's safe!


I got the Boondocks reference if it makes you feel better. In fact, I’m shocked someone even made a Boondocks reference in the first place.

drakan 10-22-2020 11:52 PM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Damn Biden has a 3.8 point lead in Florida.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com...neral/florida/

MOWJO8185 10-23-2020 03:46 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
I’m just glad that Donald Trump cleared up that he is not, in fact, Abraham Lincoln.

MDPrompter 10-23-2020 03:58 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Antiramie (Post 17811383)
Just got done backreading:

1. mdmarvich beat muskie's meat

2. Maybe the coyote ate your baby!

3. Can't believe I missed a malarkey moment. Fuck.

4. Look forward to all the lunacy in this thread on election night!

Boom! #MeatBeater (too bad Toobin’s already got a TM on that one)

BTBaboon 10-23-2020 04:21 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
First scientific poll of the debate comes from SSRS (CNN). Surveyed viewers say Biden won the debate, 53%-39%. Live caller model, of debate watchers, MoE +/- 5.7%.

That seems about right based on what we watched last night.

BTBaboon 10-23-2020 04:22 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MOWJO8185 (Post 17811390)
I’m just glad that Donald Trump cleared up that he is not, in fact, Abraham Lincoln.

The fact that the sarcasm/joke went right over his head and he appeared offended that Joe called him that was...something.

MOWJO8185 10-23-2020 04:25 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BTBaboon (Post 17811393)
The fact that the sarcasm/joke went right over his head and he appeared offended that Joe called him that was...something.


I honestly think he was trying to pull a “senile Biden” thing. That Biden got so confused up there he all of a sudden accidentally called Trump Lincoln, which is silly because the joke was super obvious.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

MDPrompter 10-23-2020 04:26 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
1 Attachment(s)
Gonna do some duck confit (previous version attached) and some pumpkin donuts this weekend.

BTBaboon 10-23-2020 05:02 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mdmarvich (Post 17811395)
Gonna do some duck confit (previous version attached) and some pumpkin donuts this weekend.

Duck looks amazing, but your plating could use some work - needs garnish ;)

BTBaboon 10-23-2020 05:06 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Muhlenberg College (A+ rated, R+0.2 mean reverted bias) with a poll of PA, conducted between Oct 13th-20th with 416 LVs, has Biden +7 (51%).

Epic-MRA (B+, R+0.2) with a poll of MI, conducted between Oct 15th-19th with 600 LVs, has Biden +9 (48%). It also has Peters (D) +6 in the Senate race at 45%.

M. Steng 10-23-2020 05:08 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
I think mav is the only person in this thread who I can honestly say is bougier than I am.

cazzie34 10-23-2020 05:10 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BTBaboon (Post 17811393)
The fact that the sarcasm/joke went right over his head and he appeared offended that Joe called him that was...something.

Trumps brain is broken.

His brain immediately went to "delusional joe thinks I'm abe lincoln. What a gaffe! He's done!"

He had a similar reaction when Biden was talking about oil.

One thing Trump does well that I wish Biden or hell even other politicians did during these debates was to take a weak point and ask Biden to explain it. "What about x, joe?"

I wish joe did more in the moment analysis of Trump's lies. If a question was "what are you going to do about x" and Trump just spews some none answer about the past, I thought it would have been powerful for Joe to go "folks, listen to what she asked, she asked about what we need to do going forward. The president didn't have an answer. No plan. He didn't give you anything he plans to do about what she asked."

cazzie34 10-23-2020 05:11 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Like, could you imagine mayor pete or Warren, who in the moment can see what bullshit Trump is trying to spew, and immediately call him out on it? Biden doesn't have that card in his deck but man would it be sweet.

But maybe that's only sweet for the people who follow politics closely. Idk.

BTBaboon 10-23-2020 05:13 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by M. Steng (Post 17811403)
I think mav is the only person in this thread who I can honestly say is bougier than I am.

While the rest of us peasants were scrounging for toilet paper this spring - couldn't even spare one square - he was laughing at us while washing his butt with a $1k bidet.

Yeah, he's bougie.

I hear his bidet actually uses desalinated tears of Trump cultists! It's why he wants Biden to win so badly, he's worried about sourcing for his bidet! #Bidet4Biden

BTBaboon 10-23-2020 05:16 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
So last night I noted that this was the last Donald Trump debate ever.

I probably spoke prematurely.

Because I'm wholly convinced that if Biden wins, Donald Trump will be the Republican nominee in 2024 if he wants it. If he decides to run again, he'll win the primaries with ease.

BruceW 10-23-2020 05:18 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mdmarvich (Post 17811395)
Gonna do some duck confit (previous version attached) and some pumpkin donuts this weekend.


Have you done the pumpkin donuts before? If so how’d they turn out and what’s your recipe?

daveshookme 10-23-2020 05:21 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BTBaboon (Post 17811408)
So last night I noted that this was the last Donald Trump debate ever.

I probably spoke prematurely.

Because I'm wholly convinced that if Biden wins, Donald Trump will be the Republican nominee in 2024 if he wants it. If he decides to run again, he'll win the primaries with ease.

If Biden wins, and there's a blue tsunami or even a wave, no way the institution of the Republican Party wants to nominate an older, more senile, more deranged Donald Trump.

Not that the voters wouldn't want it, I'm positive a huge majority of the cult won't have their brains fixed 3 years from now.

M. Steng 10-23-2020 05:23 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BTBaboon (Post 17811408)
So last night I noted that this was the last Donald Trump debate ever.

I probably spoke prematurely.

Because I'm wholly convinced that if Biden wins, Donald Trump will be the Republican nominee in 2024 if he wants it. If he decides to run again, he'll win the primaries with ease.

I place the chances of Trump still being alive in four years at roughly 5%. He is insanely unhealthy. I wouldn't be surprised if a heart attack got him within 6 months of leaving the White House.

coolhotwaves 10-23-2020 05:23 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
I’d day last nights debate was alot more even than first one. I think both sides think they won. Too bad none of these debates include questions about what these guys are actually going to do the next 4 years(joe got into this a little). DT had a pretty good amount of proposals the last time around and now he is flailing with attacks against Biden any time he gets a question, it’s not helping him.

cazzie34 10-23-2020 05:23 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Part of the reason the republican party was able to move on from bush was because bush himself faded away.


Not happening with Trump!

Congrats, republicans!

M. Steng 10-23-2020 05:28 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
There are a lot of people out there who legitimately believe that Don and Melatonin are deeply in love and have a perfect marriage:

https://www.reddit.com/r/WatchPeople...ase_thank_you/

mthawk07 10-23-2020 05:29 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
It’ll be interesting to see who the GOP turns to if Trump loses and doesn’t run again. Haley? Shorty would have continuous orgasms every day of the campaign.

BTBaboon 10-23-2020 05:29 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by daveshookme (Post 17811410)
If Biden wins, and there's a blue tsunami or even a wave, no way the institution of the Republican Party wants to nominate an older, more senile, more deranged Donald Trump.

Not that the voters wouldn't want it, I'm positive a huge majority of the cult won't have their brains fixed 3 years from now.

But that institution of Republican Party is wholly Trumpy. They could effectively start campaigning on Day 1 and run the most aggressive negative blitz for 4 straight years.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cazzie34 (Post 17811413)
Part of the reason the republican party was able to move on from bush was because bush himself faded away.

Not happening with Trump!

Congrats, republicans!

This, too.

Trump is simply NOT going out silently.

BTBaboon 10-23-2020 05:31 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mthawk07 (Post 17811415)
It’ll be interesting to see who the GOP turns to if Trump loses and doesn’t run again. Haley? Shorty would have continuous orgasms every day of the campaign.

Haley will have to do some work to get the stink of Trump off her, while still courting his base.

Tough sell.

I'd take a pre-Trump-era Haley, but I'm quite disappointed what levels she stopped to under this administration.

TheLastPig 10-23-2020 05:47 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
https://twitter.com/ParkerMolloy/sta...238777856?s=20

What Fox News said Biden said: “We had a good relationship with Hitler before he in fact invaded Europe — the rest of Europe.”

What Biden actually said: “That’s like saying we had a good relationship with Hitler before he in fact invaded Europe — the rest of Europe.”

ricky towel 10-23-2020 05:54 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BTBaboon (Post 17811417)
Haley will have to do some work to get the stink of Trump off her, while still courting his base.

Tough sell.

I'd take a pre-Trump-era Haley, but I'm quite disappointed what levels she stopped to under this administration.

Unless it’s a Republican who is no longer a Republican because they left the party over their complete embrace of Trump, then they can kick rocks.

Arby 10-23-2020 05:55 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Maybe tin foil hat stuff, but it’s a little concerning trump says he thinks they’ll win back the House. “You’ll see” he said

Really hope no one is hacking into the voting systems

swordo84 10-23-2020 05:56 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BTBaboon (Post 17811408)
So last night I noted that this was the last Donald Trump debate ever.

I probably spoke prematurely.

Because I'm wholly convinced that if Biden wins, Donald Trump will be the Republican nominee in 2024 if he wants it. If he decides to run again, he'll win the primaries with ease.

I honestly don't think that Donnie is on the top side of the dirt in 4 years. Dude is old, and unhealthy as fuck.

BTBaboon 10-23-2020 05:57 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLastPig (Post 17811421)
https://twitter.com/ParkerMolloy/sta...238777856?s=20

What Fox News said Biden said: “We had a good relationship with Hitler before he in fact invaded Europe — the rest of Europe.”

What Biden actually said: “That’s like saying we had a good relationship with Hitler before he in fact invaded Europe — the rest of Europe.”

Yup, Biden is bashing Trump for suggesting we can have "good relationships" with evil people. Does Fox or their viewers really think it is a good thing to be friends with murderous, genocidal, dictators?

snow1868 10-23-2020 05:57 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
In line and ready to cast my ballot for Biden!

TheLastPig 10-23-2020 05:58 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arby (Post 17811423)
Maybe tin foil hat stuff, but it’s a little concerning trump says he thinks they’ll win back the House. “You’ll see” he said

Really hope no one is hacking into the voting systems

:lol

He says that about everything. Said the same about his supposed healthcare plan

TheLastStop123 10-23-2020 05:58 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
donald is gonna outlive us all

ToySoldier#34 10-23-2020 06:02 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
I found it interesting that Biden went the "show the video" route when it came to fracking and arguing that he never said he opposed it, just an odd move and it would have been better to explain how his view has changed over time.

coldengrey12 10-23-2020 06:03 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by neumdogg (Post 17811384)
I got the Boondocks reference if it makes you feel better. In fact, I’m shocked someone even made a Boondocks reference in the first place.

I'm glad someone got it! :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLastPig (Post 17811421)
https://twitter.com/ParkerMolloy/sta...238777856?s=20

What Fox News said Biden said: “We had a good relationship with Hitler before he in fact invaded Europe — the rest of Europe.”

What Biden actually said: “That’s like saying we had a good relationship with Hitler before he in fact invaded Europe — the rest of Europe.”

You can almost smell the disingenuousness

It's quite pungent. Really stings the nostrils

mthawk07 10-23-2020 06:03 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arby (Post 17811423)
Maybe tin foil hat stuff, but it’s a little concerning trump says he thinks they’ll win back the House. “You’ll see” he said

Really hope no one is hacking into the voting systems


Yeah just ignore him. He and the GOP were spouting the same nonsense before they got wiped out in 2018.

TheLastPig 10-23-2020 06:03 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ToySoldier#34 (Post 17811430)
I found it interesting that Biden went the "show the video" route when it came to fracking and arguing that he never said he opposed it, just an odd move and it would have been better to explain how his view has changed over time.

??

He immediately explained how we have to shift away from it over time. Pretty self explanatory.

ricky towel 10-23-2020 06:06 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Was there a bunch of shitty politicians back in the day trying to desperately hold onto the stagecoach builder industry when cars were the new thing?

Arby 10-23-2020 06:06 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLastPig (Post 17811427)
:lol

He says that about everything. Said the same about his supposed healthcare plan

Quote:

Originally Posted by mthawk07 (Post 17811432)
Yeah just ignore him. He and the GOP were spouting the same nonsense before they got wiped out in 2018.

you're probably right, but election security is very much on my mind here in the home stretch

TheLastPig 10-23-2020 06:08 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arby (Post 17811436)
you're probably right, but election security is very much on my mind here in the home stretch

Its the same mindset when you see his supporters tweet stuff like #RedTSUNAMI

Its just talk

ricky towel 10-23-2020 06:09 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Trump also claims he’s going to win New York.

ToySoldier#34 10-23-2020 06:10 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLastPig (Post 17811433)
??

He immediately explained how we have to shift away from it over time. Pretty self explanatory.

"I never said I oppose fracking"
"You said it on tape"
"I didn't, show the tape"

The tape already exists, this isn't new to last night

BTBaboon 10-23-2020 06:12 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
There were 75K reported cases of coronavirus yesterday, the day the President said we had rounded a corner and that it's going away; while on the debate stage.

Over the past 3 days, roughly 3,000 people have died from this virus - in what is now a 3rd wave, while the President took no responsibility and promised a cure (the vaccine) in a matter of weeks; when the fact is that this is going to be a rough few months.

He presents a false choice between binary paths with COVID: one of a total lockdown that is cast as more restrictive than any seen in the first wave, and another of being completely open with no restrictions, no masks, etc. Ignoring that we can have an open economy and a fair degree of social interaction, while taking precautions to reduce spread of the virus.

On a night in which it became as clear as ever that a fall/winter wave of the pandemic is coming, the President made a clear pitch to more of the same approach that leads to sickness, death, and economic ruin.

M. Steng 10-23-2020 06:13 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ToySoldier#34 (Post 17811439)
"I never said I oppose fracking"
"You said it on tape"
"I didn't, show the tape"

The tape already exists, this isn't new to last night

Why is fracking and oil such a major issue for you this election?

cazzie34 10-23-2020 06:13 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Happy comey letter day!

M. Steng 10-23-2020 06:14 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BTBaboon (Post 17811440)
There were 75K reported cases of coronavirus yesterday, the day the President said we had rounded a corner and that it's going away; while on the debate stage.

Over the past 3 days, roughly 3,000 people have died from this virus - in what is now a 3rd wave, while the President took no responsibility and promised a cure (the vaccine) in a matter of weeks; when the fact is that this is going to be a rough few months.

He presents a false choice between binary paths with COVID: one of a total lockdown that is cast as more restrictive than any seen in the first wave, and another of being completely open with no restrictions, no masks, etc. Ignoring that we can have an open economy and a fair degree of social interaction, while taking precautions to reduce spread of the virus.

On a night in which it became as clear as ever that a fall/winter wave of the pandemic is coming, the President made a clear pitch to more of the same approach that leads to sickness, death, and economic ruin.

Because he's a dullard that lacks any critical thinking skills whatsoever. Least surprising thing in the world that he's seeing this as an all-or-nothing, binary issue.

cazzie34 10-23-2020 06:14 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ToySoldier#34 (Post 17811439)
"I never said I oppose fracking"
"You said it on tape"
"I didn't, show the tape"

The tape already exists, this isn't new to last night

Show the tape, toy. Show it.

TheLastPig 10-23-2020 06:15 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ToySoldier#34 (Post 17811439)
"I never said I oppose fracking"
"You said it on tape"
"I didn't, show the tape"

The tape already exists, this isn't new to last night

....and whats your issue since he explained what he meant right after?

BTBaboon 10-23-2020 06:16 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLastPig (Post 17811433)
??

He immediately explained how we have to shift away from it over time. Pretty self explanatory.

The tape Trump is talking about also makes pretty clear that Biden said he is against fracking on federal lands, not all fracking, which he also reiterated in that segment.

TheLastPig 10-23-2020 06:17 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BTBaboon (Post 17811446)
The tape Trump is talking about also makes pretty clear that Biden said he is against fracking on federal lands, not all fracking, which he also reiterated in that segment.

Yea, the entire exchange was very clear. It was just a weak trump jab with no substance.

BruceW 10-23-2020 06:17 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BTBaboon (Post 17811440)
There were 75K reported cases of coronavirus yesterday, the day the President said we had rounded a corner and that it's going away; while on the debate stage.

Over the past 3 days, roughly 3,000 people have died from this virus - in what is now a 3rd wave, while the President took no responsibility and promised a cure (the vaccine) in a matter of weeks; when the fact is that this is going to be a rough few months.

He presents a false choice between binary paths with COVID: one of a total lockdown that is cast as more restrictive than any seen in the first wave, and another of being completely open with no restrictions, no masks, etc. Ignoring that we can have an open economy and a fair degree of social interaction, while taking precautions to reduce spread of the virus.

On a night in which it became as clear as ever that a fall/winter wave of the pandemic is coming, the President made a clear pitch to more of the same approach that leads to sickness, death, and economic ruin.

2 people who my wife has been in close contact with since last Sunday, one of them I have also been around, have now tested positive. Wife is getting a rapid test in about 30 min, and depending on those results I will likely get one tomorrow.

Arby 10-23-2020 06:17 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BTBaboon (Post 17811440)
There were 75K reported cases of coronavirus yesterday, the day the President said we had rounded a corner and that it's going away; while on the debate stage.

Over the past 3 days, roughly 3,000 people have died from this virus - in what is now a 3rd wave, while the President took no responsibility and promised a cure (the vaccine) in a matter of weeks; when the fact is that this is going to be a rough few months.

He presents a false choice between binary paths with COVID: one of a total lockdown that is cast as more restrictive than any seen in the first wave, and another of being completely open with no restrictions, no masks, etc. Ignoring that we can have an open economy and a fair degree of social interaction, while taking precautions to reduce spread of the virus.

On a night in which it became as clear as ever that a fall/winter wave of the pandemic is coming, the President made a clear pitch to more of the same approach that leads to sickness, death, and economic ruin.

'weve gotta be able to walk and chew gum at the same time'

great line by Biden - oldie but a goodie

TheLastStop123 10-23-2020 06:17 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
amazing that because of a few thousand voters in Pennsylvania we all have to talk about fracking

YouNeverKnow25 10-23-2020 06:20 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLastStop123 (Post 17811450)
amazing that because of a few thousand voters in Pennsylvania we all have to talk about fracking

fuck you man my house is fracked to shit, let's talk fracking!

BTBaboon 10-23-2020 06:21 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BruceW (Post 17811448)
2 people who my wife has been in close contact with since last Sunday, one of them I have also been around, have now tested positive. Wife is getting a rapid test in about 30 min, and depending on those results I will likely get one tomorrow.

Hope you guys are both negative!

Feeling any symptoms?

Glad you can get a rapid test. Quick turnaround on testing is what's going to do a ton of leg work to keep the economy going and allowing for social mobility. The value of being able to know, within 30 minutes, if you have enough viral load to spread or not, with or without prior exposure, is HUGE.

The fact that we don't have rapid testing available everywhere because supply is limited, and there's very little federal and interstate coordination, is a complete failure.

mdel21 10-23-2020 06:22 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
We are going back to no indoor dining in parts of Illinois again and people are freaking out of course. "Why's it okay to go to Target but not sit in a restaurant for 90 minutes???" Gee dumbass, let's compare those two things. One is a 15 minute or less visit with constant moving, mask wearing, only touching things you're taking, and minimal to zero interaction with others. The other is a seated situation for an hour or more where you are not wearing a mask for a majority of it while handling silverware and plates and other things that have been handled by multiple people while interact with hostesses, wait staff, runners, busboys, bartenders, etc.

ricky towel 10-23-2020 06:22 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
What the hell has Trump actually done for coal?

cazzie34 10-23-2020 06:23 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Comparing to 2016 again.

The third debate in 2016 was October 19, 20 days before the election. Clinton obviously won the debate and her lead, built by the access hollywood tape, stayed steady for the next week. It started regressing to the mean and then the comey letter came. 11 days to discuss the comey letter. It started to tank quickly.

Compare that to 2020. The third debate, which Biden won, was only 12 days from the election. He should get a little bit of a sugar high from it, say 5 days worth, which leads us to 1 week before the election.

Tick tock, Trump.

ricky towel 10-23-2020 06:24 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
For the first time since records began, the Artic is not freezing in late October.

The delayed annual freeze in the Laptev Sea has been caused by freakishly protracted warmth in northern Russia and the intrusion of Atlantic waters.

https://twitter.com/travisakers/stat...735275008?s=21

Arby 10-23-2020 06:24 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
'frack your federal lands'

trump 2020

ToySoldier#34 10-23-2020 06:27 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by M. Steng (Post 17811441)
Why is fracking and oil such a major issue for you this election?

It isn't a major issue to me personally, but having a presidential option running against the worst POTUS in history who doesn't contradict himself on policy would be nice. Politicians change their views, I'd prefer someone who was aware that their view has changed and be able to explain why. It's not much different than the GND which George Stephanopoulos correctly pointed out has contradicting messages between what is on their campaign website and what is stated vocally.

Arby 10-23-2020 06:28 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mdel21 (Post 17811454)
We are going back to no indoor dining in parts of Illinois again and people are freaking out of course. "Why's it okay to go to Target but not sit in a restaurant for 90 minutes???" Gee dumbass, let's compare those two things. One is a 15 minute or less visit with constant moving, mask wearing, only touching things you're taking, and minimal to zero interaction with others. The other is a seated situation for an hour or more where you are not wearing a mask for a majority of it while handling silverware and plates and other things that have been handled by multiple people while interact with hostesses, wait staff, runners, busboys, bartenders, etc.

Yea, its frustrating to see people's lack of understanding on display. I've seen shit like "Illinois/Chicago leadership is so terrible. why open indoor bars just to close them after two weeks?"

uh, because leadership is actually following a plan they made and people as a whole are not acting responsibly enough to keep the numbers down

TheLastPig 10-23-2020 06:29 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ToySoldier#34 (Post 17811459)
It isn't a major issue to me personally, but having a presidential option running against the worst POTUS in history who doesn't contradict himself on policy would be nice. Politicians change their views, I'd prefer someone who was aware that their view has changed and be able to explain why. It's not much different than the GND which George Stephanopoulos correctly pointed out has contradicting messages between what is on their campaign website and what is stated vocally.


So youre just ignoring the facts of what he was talking about in the clip and totally tossing aside his full explanation last night and claiming hes contradicting himself?

daveshookme 10-23-2020 06:29 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ToySoldier#34 (Post 17811459)
It isn't a major issue to me personally, but having a presidential option running against the worst POTUS in history who doesn't contradict himself on policy would be nice. Politicians change their views, I'd prefer someone who was aware that their view has changed and be able to explain why. It's not much different than the GND which George Stephanopoulos correctly pointed out has contradicting messages between what is on their campaign website and what is stated vocally.

....Has Joe contradicted himself on fracking?

M. Steng 10-23-2020 06:29 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ToySoldier#34 (Post 17811459)
It isn't a major issue to me personally, but having a presidential option running against the worst POTUS in history who doesn't contradict himself on policy would be nice. Politicians change their views, I'd prefer someone who was aware that their view has changed and be able to explain why. It's not much different than the GND which George Stephanopoulos correctly pointed out has contradicting messages between what is on their campaign website and what is stated vocally.

But Biden literally has addressed both of these things multiple times. Are his answers simply not to your satisfaction?

daveshookme 10-23-2020 06:31 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mdel21 (Post 17811454)
We are going back to no indoor dining in parts of Illinois again and people are freaking out of course. "Why's it okay to go to Target but not sit in a restaurant for 90 minutes???" Gee dumbass, let's compare those two things. One is a 15 minute or less visit with constant moving, mask wearing, only touching things you're taking, and minimal to zero interaction with others. The other is a seated situation for an hour or more where you are not wearing a mask for a majority of it while handling silverware and plates and other things that have been handled by multiple people while interact with hostesses, wait staff, runners, busboys, bartenders, etc.

Same thing happened here in NY. Why can I go to the grocery store but I can't go to applebees! Why can I shop in the grocery section of Target but I can't go get ___(insert wholly unnecessary item here)___>>>

Looney toons. No understanding of nuance or critical thinking.

BTBaboon 10-23-2020 06:32 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ToySoldier#34 (Post 17811459)
It isn't a major issue to me personally, but having a presidential option running against the worst POTUS in history who doesn't contradict himself on policy would be nice.

What is the contradiction on fracking?

He said he is against fracking on federal lands, is for keeping existing fracking, and is against new grants for future fracking sites.

That's been a consistent message. Role the tape, he says as much. He doesn't say he is against ALL fracking. He's spoken to the specifics, and the details matter here.

TheLastPig 10-23-2020 06:32 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arby (Post 17811460)
Yea, its frustrating to see people's lack of understanding on display. I've seen shit like "Illinois/Chicago leadership is so terrible. why open indoor bars just to close them after two weeks?"

uh, because leadership is actually following a plan they made and people as a whole are not acting responsibly enough to keep the numbers down

Its just amazing how none of these people even give a second thought to the president doing nothing about this one way or the other.

Shouldnt they be mad he doesnt actually do anything besides tweet "OPEN UP"?

cazzie34 10-23-2020 06:33 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Who is a politician you have voted for, toy?

Did you vote markey?
Moulton?

bradshaw06 10-23-2020 06:34 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cazzie34 (Post 17811456)
Comparing to 2016 again.

The third debate in 2016 was October 19, 20 days before the election. Clinton obviously won the debate and her lead, built by the access hollywood tape, stayed steady for the next week. It started regressing to the mean and then the comey letter came. 11 days to discuss the comey letter. It started to tank quickly.

Compare that to 2020. The third debate, which Biden won, was only 12 days from the election. He should get a little bit of a sugar high from it, say 5 days worth, which leads us to 1 week before the election.

Tick tock, Trump.

One other big difference is how many people this year have already voted. It probably already skewed toward biden anyway but maybe pads his lead in case something goes wrong.

YouNeverKnow25 10-23-2020 06:36 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
biden has said multiple times that he's against fracking, full stop, and multiple times his campaign has clarified that he's against federal land fracking


this is....GOOD! while I don't love the politics of constant hedging back toward the bipartisanship golden cow, I like knowing that the person I'm voting for is personally against a bad thing but is working piecemeal toward eliminating it. that's progress.

drop2d 10-23-2020 06:42 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BTBaboon (Post 17811466)
What is the contradiction on fracking?

He said he is against fracking on federal lands, is for keeping existing fracking, and is against new grants for future fracking sites.

That's been a consistent message. Role the tape, he says as much. He doesn't say he is against ALL fracking. He's spoken to the specifics, and the details matter here.

You mean a politician can have a nuanced position on a subject? :eek

BTW... even if he wanted to ban fracking - as far as he's ever going to get is the position you've laid out. Fossil fuels will be the slowest 'phase out' of anything we've ever seen. Just too much money at stake.

mandy18 10-23-2020 06:45 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BTBaboon (Post 17811453)
Hope you guys are both negative!

Feeling any symptoms?

Glad you can get a rapid test. Quick turnaround on testing is what's going to do a ton of leg work to keep the economy going and allowing for social mobility. The value of being able to know, within 30 minutes, if you have enough viral load to spread or not, with or without prior exposure, is HUGE.

The fact that we don't have rapid testing available everywhere because supply is limited, and there's very little federal and interstate coordination, is a complete failure.

As someone who previously touted the availability of rapid testing near me, I have to admit, I’ve walked back my opinion of them.

Rapid antigen testing (which I think is the only type that exists right now) isn’t going to catch a positive if tested too early. Their reliability is what - about 50% rate of false negatives?

We need to send a strong message that regardless of test result, if you have a known exposure (Bruce, for example), you need to notify who you’ve been in contact with (to the best of your ability - like if Bruce then went to his parents house for a visit) and self-quarantine.

We won’t “round the corner” if people get a false negative and go about their business. We can’t rely on testing with that poor of results. We need a hard push on self-quarantine and monitoring for symptoms.

I believe there was recent approval for a more reliable antigen testing, and that could be good news.

But I’ve gone back to my earlier stance. We can’t just rely on a negative test.
Particularly in the case of known exposure, the message still needs to be hammered hard to self-quarantine.


Quote:

Originally Posted by mdel21 (Post 17811454)
We are going back to no indoor dining in parts of Illinois again and people are freaking out of course. "Why's it okay to go to Target but not sit in a restaurant for 90 minutes???" Gee dumbass, let's compare those two things. One is a 15 minute or less visit with constant moving, mask wearing, only touching things you're taking, and minimal to zero interaction with others. The other is a seated situation for an hour or more where you are not wearing a mask for a majority of it while handling silverware and plates and other things that have been handled by multiple people while interact with hostesses, wait staff, runners, busboys, bartenders, etc.

15 minutes in Target. Please. I can spend 15 minutes in one section. :lol

ricky towel 10-23-2020 06:47 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mandy18 (Post 17811475)
As someone who previously touted the availability of rapid testing near me, I have to admit, I’ve walked back my opinion of them.

Rapid antigen testing (which I think is the only type that exists right now) isn’t going to catch a positive if tested too early. Their reliability is what - about 50% rate of false negatives?

We need to send a strong message that regardless of test result, if you have a known exposure (Bruce, for example), you need to notify who you’ve been in contact with (to the best of your ability - like if Bruce then went to his parents house for a visit) and self-quarantine.

We won’t “round the corner” if people get a false negative and go about their business. We can’t rely on testing with that poor of results. We need a hard push on self-quarantine and monitoring for symptoms.

I believe there was recent approval for a more reliable antigen testing, and that could be good news.

But I’ve gone back to my earlier stance. We can’t just rely on a negative test.
Particularly in the case of known exposure, the message still needs to be hammered hard to self-quarantine.




15 minutes in Target. Please. I can spend 15 minutes in one section. :lol




Gonna be a tough sell when a lot of the “leadership” of this country refused to quarantine or even take a test after known exposures.

ToySoldier#34 10-23-2020 06:47 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BTBaboon (Post 17811466)
What is the contradiction on fracking?

He said he is against fracking on federal lands, is for keeping existing fracking, and is against new grants for future fracking sites.

That's been a consistent message. Role the tape, he says as much. He doesn't say he is against ALL fracking. He's spoken to the specifics, and the details matter here.

He was asked in the July 2019 Democratic presidential debate if there would be any place for fossil fuels including coal and fracking in a Biden administration to which he answered "No, we would work it out, make sure it is eliminated and no more subsidies for either one of those". The question was wide open and not specific to federal lands, if he is for keeping existing fracking it would seem he would think there is a place for it in his administration and he wouldn't aim to end it.

TheLastPig 10-23-2020 06:50 AM

Re: *Prompter Thread* (NO Personal Attacks, Trolling, breaking 52 USC 30121 OR 2 USC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ToySoldier#34 (Post 17811478)
He was asked in the July 2019 Democratic presidential debate if there would be any place for fossil fuels including coal and fracking in a Biden administration to which he answered "No, we would work it out, make sure it is eliminated and no more subsidies for either one of those". The question was wide open and not specific to federal lands, if he is for keeping existing fracking it would seem he would think there is a place for it in his administration and he wouldn't aim to end it.

This is the best youve got here? His explanation of slowly phasing it out still falls under this. The end goal is to eliminate. Youre really stretching.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.14
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All trademarks and copyrights are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest is owned by antsmarching.org.