Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Hawks!!!!
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Very excited for Thursday night.
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
I think Saad goes back to juniors when Stalberg returns or after 9 games, unless he really, really lights it up. |
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
surprised Stall being out didn't bring us down at all. I'll take 11th, for now.
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
Best!@!!! |
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
That said, if he puts up 4-5 goals, 8-10 pts in his first 9 games, then what? It would be pretty tough sending down someone who could potentially be an improvement over guys like Stalberg/Olesz... |
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
They got be kidding with the Rangers that high.
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
I know Queen Henrik, I mean King is a vezina candidate as always but I just don't see it either. And it is not just hatred and bias against them coming thru, |
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
I think the Rangers will be awesome
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
I have an incredibly hard time rating the Flyers above teams like the Canucks considering the high roster turn over from the year before. No one has any idea where these goals are coming from that they lost through their off season trades. |
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
a lot of things are fucked about that list. Philly is too high, as much as it pains me to say, Vancouver should be #2 just because, but it wouldn't last long. Why the fuck are the Blues 12th? above the Preds and Lightning? and why are the Lightning 14th?
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
I think Bryzgalov will be just fine in Philly. His numbers will probably be very solid. I just can't believe that team would be ranked 4th going into the season with the question marks they have. And Lightning 14th is nuts too. Way too low for them right now.
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
seriously...the Blues?
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
I am such a homer cause I said nothing about the Flyers being that high. I have them probably 12th at the lowest. The Lightning should be top ten just because of Stamkos.
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Yeah, it's crazy to put the Canucks (largely the same team, went to the SCF) below Philadelphia (large turnover, lot of questions). They could be fantastic, or they could see a big drop in the standings.
Can't wait for the games to start... |
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
Lock up that dynamic duo of yours. |
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Drop da Puck!
:hump |
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Quote:
|
Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
Barnaby picked the Flyers to win the cup. While I don't doubt the chances of that or how good they can be, nobody knows yet and they haven't even played a game. How can you pick a team with so much change to just win it all? I don't understand that.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.14
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All trademarks and copyrights are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest is owned by antsmarching.org.