Antsmarching.org Forums - Dave Matthews Band Discussion

Antsmarching.org Forums - Dave Matthews Band Discussion (https://www.antsmarching.org/forum/index.php)
-   The Tailgate (https://www.antsmarching.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=93)
-   -   The NHL Thread (https://www.antsmarching.org/forum/showthread.php?t=324692)

RiotAct 12-05-2011 07:09 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bradshaw06 (Post 13164277)
lol wut?

:lol Dude Washington's in shambles right now. Plus don't the Pens always beat them? Well, I guess they're not going to always be as bad as they are right now... lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by bonzo48280 (Post 13164324)
no more West and East. There are just 4 separate conferences. I like that.

Me too :thumbsup

bradshaw06 12-05-2011 07:16 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RiotAct (Post 13164344)
:lol Dude Washington's in shambles right now. Plus don't the Pens always beat them? Well, I guess they're not going to always be as bad as they are right now... lol



Me too :thumbsup

na, not exactly. the pens won against the caps last week for the first time in regulation in about two years. my gripe really isnt about the teams in my teams division, because they're some great rivalries, its more about the playoffs for me.

jackisback24 12-05-2011 07:21 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Bruins win! Down goes Pittsburgh! Down goes Pittsburgh.:hump

Bron Yr Aur 12-05-2011 07:29 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
What a hockey game in Chicago. Very hard earned point for both teams. Wow, what a pace. Feels like the playoffs.

bonzo48280 12-05-2011 07:38 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
To bring it to a shootout against Phoenix when down 3-0 is amazing. Tippet is like 117-9-3 when scoring first, and I'm not making that up, I'm just unsure of the exact record, it's in that ball park. I'll look up the official number after the shootout. this has been all Hawks since the end of the first.

bonzo48280 12-05-2011 07:39 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
He is 114-9-12 when scoring first

bradshaw06 12-05-2011 07:42 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
nhlpa hasnt approved yet

Bron Yr Aur 12-05-2011 07:43 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Too bad, Hawks had a ton of golden opportunities. Stalberg missing the net on the doorstep (:rolleyes) from Toews...Yandle denying Hossa on the empty net on a nasty bouncing puck. I'll take a point after being down 3-0 but the defense has to be better. So much time running around like idiots inside their own zone.

bonzo48280 12-05-2011 07:44 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
My hatred for shootouts strikes again. I don't even like winning them.

Bron Yr Aur 12-05-2011 07:46 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bonzo48280 (Post 13164452)
My hatred for shootouts strikes again. I don't even like winning them.

It was fun for a while, but now it's rather pointless. Oh well, every team pretty much wins and loses just about the same number of them.

monkeyman68 12-05-2011 08:13 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Are the Caps fans sad that they won't be winning any more President's Trophies?

rickyh24 12-05-2011 08:51 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
lollerpens

Brohan_Santana 12-05-2011 08:56 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Fuck this realignment bullshit. NHL just trying to make more money. Upset I'll have to deal with the scrum of the earth philly fans 6 times a year makes me want to take a dump on Gary B's pillow case. Also the fact that TB and FLA are way out of place in group c.

Brohan_Santana 12-05-2011 09:01 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Washington Capitals with Mike Green in the lineup: 8-0-0
Washington Capitals without Mike Green in the lineup: 5-12-1

Mike Green = most valuable D player.

Brohan_Santana 12-05-2011 09:09 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Oh and in other news, the NHL has decided to rename the NYR/PHL/PIT/WASH conference to the NBC Conference. True Story

monkeyman68 12-05-2011 09:47 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Brohan_Santana (Post 13164609)
Fuck this realignment bullshit. NHL just trying to make more money. Upset I'll have to deal with the scrum of the earth philly fans 6 times a year makes me want to take a dump on Gary B's pillow case. Also the fact that TB and FLA are way out of place in group c.

Look on the bright side, you won't be padding your point total by playing in a shitty division. This way, when you loose in the playoffs, it shouldn't come as a complete surprise :thumbsup

jackisback24 12-05-2011 09:48 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
All together now People!


Bruins!!!!!!:bounce

DMBCubs25 12-05-2011 10:06 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Brohan_Santana (Post 13164623)
Washington Capitals with Mike Green in the lineup: 8-0-0
Washington Capitals without Mike Green in the lineup: 5-12-1

Mike Green = most valuable D player.

Your an idiot.

Do you even watch the games? Before April I mean?

barbogast 12-06-2011 04:30 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Brohan_Santana (Post 13164609)
Fuck this realignment bullshit. NHL just trying to make more money. Upset I'll have to deal with the scrum of the earth philly fans 6 times a year makes me want to take a dump on Gary B's pillow case. Also the fact that TB and FLA are way out of place in group c.

TB and FLA are pretty much out of place no matter where you put them. Although it sucks for the teams in that conference. I'm so happy the Caps won't play those garbage teams all the time. The WSH/PIT/PHI/NYR/NYI/NJ/CAR division is stacked, but I love it.

One question I do have that I haven't seen brought up yet: how is the All Star game going to work? Are they just gonna keep doing what they did last year? I'd be okay with that

dduncan6er 12-06-2011 04:58 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jackisback24 (Post 13164701)
All together now People!


Bruins!!!!!!:bounce

This is getting very old very quick.

Mateo2k 12-06-2011 05:44 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
I would have preferred:


Montreal
Toronto
Ottawa
NY R
NY I
Buffalo
Boston

----
Washington
Carolina
Florida
Tampa
Pitt
Phi
NJ

barbogast 12-06-2011 05:50 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
The only problem I have is the playoff format. I'm not a fan of having teams with fewer points getting in while teams with more points don't, and I feel like that's going to happen. I say if there's basically no more east and west, and the league has no problem with an east team playing a west team in round 3 of the playoffs, just put the top 16 teams in a bracket (1v16, 2v15, etc) and reseed each round until there's a champion. I feel like it can't get any more fair than that.

~Crashintome89~ 12-06-2011 06:14 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by barbogast (Post 13164928)
TB and FLA are pretty much out of place no matter where you put them. Although it sucks for the teams in that conference. I'm so happy the Caps won't play those garbage teams all the time. The WSH/PIT/PHI/NYR/NYI/NJ/CAR division is stacked, but I love it.

One question I do have that I haven't seen brought up yet: how is the All Star game going to work? Are they just gonna keep doing what they did last year? I'd be okay with that

Have you seen whose first in your division? :lol:lol:lol:lol:lol

barbogast 12-06-2011 06:24 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Crashintome89~ (Post 13165055)
Have you seen whose first in your division? :lol:lol:lol:lol:lol

Yeah I guess garbage was the wrong term to use. I mean you're right, FLA is on top of the division and TB made them look even more playoff inept than they already did last year. What I meant was nobody really seems to care about those teams (FLA in particular) even though they are good, and it's boring to watch. ATL was dreadful. And after being so overly saturated with these teams it's a nice change. I get much more excited for Flyers and Pens games than I do Panthers and Bolts games.

AJF_41 12-06-2011 06:41 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Has this been discussed in here? I'm sure it has, sorry if it's a duplicate post.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/06/sp...imes&seid=auto

TMoore4075 12-06-2011 07:06 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RiotAct (Post 13164228)
Rumor has it that every team will play at least one home-and-home with every other team in the league, and then the remaining games will all be intra-conference.

So for instance, the Sabres will play the 23 teams not in their conference twice each for a total of 46 games, and for the remaining 36 they'll play their conference foes 6x each (3 at home, and 3 away).

Not sure how it'll work for the teams with 8 in their conference though (22x2 = 44, and then how will you split up the remaining 38 games?)

What you said is right on. I guess for the 8 team conferences it will be some teams you play 5 and others 6 and it will be on a rotating basis. So the Wings for instance will face the Hawks 5 times one year and 6 another depending.
Quote:

Originally Posted by bonzo48280 (Post 13164275)
Ecstatic about this realignment. Real happy about.

Me too
Quote:

Originally Posted by bonzo48280 (Post 13164296)
the rivalries with the Blues, Stars, Wings, and Wild are gonna be amazing.

It's the old Norris Division really. It's the Norris plus the Wild, Jackets and Preds.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Brohan_Santana (Post 13164609)
Fuck this realignment bullshit. NHL just trying to make more money. Upset I'll have to deal with the scrum of the earth philly fans 6 times a year makes me want to take a dump on Gary B's pillow case. Also the fact that TB and FLA are way out of place in group c.

It's not about money. Eastern teams will actually spend more on travel, although Western teams (well the ones in the middle of the states) will travel less. It's about a more balanced schedule and to level the playing field. I mean Eastern teams will travel less no matter what just cause of location but Western teams shouldn't have to jump 3 time zones because of their location.
Quote:

Originally Posted by barbogast (Post 13165001)
The only problem I have is the playoff format. I'm not a fan of having teams with fewer points getting in while teams with more points don't, and I feel like that's going to happen. I say if there's basically no more east and west, and the league has no problem with an east team playing a west team in round 3 of the playoffs, just put the top 16 teams in a bracket (1v16, 2v15, etc) and reseed each round until there's a champion. I feel like it can't get any more fair than that.

They used to do 1-16. Why we had a Philly/Isles Final in 80. I understand this argument but you had that in the 3 division system in a way with home ice advanaage. Less now but 2002 the Canes were the 16th team in the playoffs but got the 3rd seed in the East. There are pluses and minuses to both setups really.

I'm of course a huge fan of this. Trips west are cut in half. I like the rivalry with the Sharks and I like playing the Canucks but I hate going out there twice. Playoff time is even better. That was my biggest complaint. Travel sucked for the players while teams like Buffalo and TO are 4-5 hour drive away and they've got it easy. But for me 8:30 would be the LATEST start time in the playoffs. I really hope that they still do stick to the a West/East Conference Finals though. I mean I like the tradition of the Campbell Bowl and Wales Trophy. How would you award those? Second while it would be kinda cool to have it re-seeded 1-4 it's not good for the NHL ratings wise to have two East teams face off or two West teams face off. Probably more so West. As someone said Sharks/Stars Final? Ratings juggernaut there huh?

AJF_41 12-06-2011 07:14 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AJF_41 (Post 13165126)
Has this been discussed in here? I'm sure it has, sorry if it's a duplicate post.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/06/sp...imes&seid=auto

I didn't know all of the specifics in the last few years of his life. Yikes.

Sounds like he needed a good friend.

NY Rangers didn't do much to help, if anything aided the prescription pills. His family members and "friends" did the same thing.

I didn't know the thing about two other "enforcers" killing themselves. Tough call. It is a lot like boxing.

Trading dollars for your life I guess.

dmbetc 12-06-2011 07:37 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AJF_41 (Post 13165126)
Has this been discussed in here? I'm sure it has, sorry if it's a duplicate post.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/06/sp...imes&seid=auto

I hadn't read that yet. Thank you for sharing. Some crazy stuff in there. I never knew that side of him...I guess most didn't though.

TMoore4075 12-06-2011 07:38 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
So what are we thinking in terms of names of the conferences? I know it won't be Adams..Smythe and so on because your stupid fans...I mean average fans don't get it. I mean could go back to Pacific, Central and whatever or do they go Gretzky, Howe, Orr...etc like that? I mean if FLA and TBL weren't with TO and the rest it would be NE but that doesn't really fit for them.

fonzz41 12-06-2011 07:42 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AJF_41 (Post 13165126)
Has this been discussed in here? I'm sure it has, sorry if it's a duplicate post.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/06/sp...imes&seid=auto

This is a powerful article. Thanks for posting. :thumbsup

fonzz41 12-06-2011 07:44 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TMoore4075 (Post 13165287)
So what are we thinking in terms of names of the conferences? I know it won't be Adams..Smythe and so on because your stupid fans...I mean average fans don't get it. I mean could go back to Pacific, Central and whatever or do they go Gretzky, Howe, Orr...etc like that? I mean if FLA and TBL weren't with TO and the rest it would be NE but that doesn't really fit for them.

Gretzky
Howe
Orr
OMGCG

dduncan6er 12-06-2011 07:47 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
I'd love to see the Bruins division named after Orr just to see how pissed everyone in Montreal would be.

fonzz41 12-06-2011 07:48 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Looks like Barnaby got dropped by ESPN after his DWI arrest. Idiot.

TMoore4075 12-06-2011 08:03 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fonzz41 (Post 13165318)
Looks like Barnaby got dropped by ESPN after his DWI arrest. Idiot.

Yeah. Hit his wife or something not long ago didn't he?

TMoore4075 12-06-2011 09:08 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Of course still on realignment, the one argument I saw on TSN was you want the best 4 teams in the final 4. That doesn't always happen now. A #1 seed can get beat by #8. Their argument was 1985 when the Oilers, Flames and Jets were 3 of top 5 teams overall during the regular season and you knew that two of them would be gone by the 3rd round. The Norris sucked that year so I think TSN was being Canadian biased with that one. There are more good teams now so while you might get a 5th team in one conf. not making it I personally don't think the whole "best 4" argument coming from people is a good one.

Also I had said I wanted it still to really be a Western Conference or Eastern Conference Final I think it will be. You can sell more t-shirts that way. It would probably say Campbell Bowl winners or something but more sales baby. Also the whole divisional playoff will get them tshirts there too.

Bron Yr Aur 12-06-2011 09:16 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TMoore4075 (Post 13165551)
Of course still on realignment, the one argument I saw on TSN was you want the best 4 teams in the final 4. That doesn't always happen now. A #1 seed can get beat by #8. Their argument was 1985 when the Oilers, Flames and Jets were 3 of top 5 teams overall during the regular season and you knew that two of them would be gone by the 3rd round. The Norris sucked that year so I think TSN was being Canadian biased with that one. There are more good teams now so while you might get a 5th team in one conf. not making it I personally don't think the whole "best 4" argument coming from people is a good one.

Also I had said I wanted it still to really be a Western Conference or Eastern Conference Final I think it will be. You can sell more t-shirts that way. It would probably say Campbell Bowl winners or something but more sales baby. Also the whole divisional playoff will get them tshirts there too.

Not sure if I'm quite understanding this correctly, but I think by subdividing the conferences further like this, the odds of having the best teams come through actually decreases. Especially because each conference is now guaranteed 1 team in the final 4. Look at last season. Van vs. SJ in the WCF. It would be tough to argue that those 2 teams weren't the best in the West, yet now they play in the same division and only one could make it to the semi-finals. It also gives teams at the top of a very weak conference an advantage to get to the semi-finals over teams in very strong ones. So, I'm not a huge fan of the new playoff system.

TMoore4075 12-06-2011 09:30 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bron Yr Aur (Post 13165570)
Not sure if I'm quite understanding this correctly, but I think by subdividing the conferences further like this, the odds of having the best teams come through actually decreases. Especially because each conference is now guaranteed 1 team in the final 4. Look at last season. Van vs. SJ in the WCF. It would be tough to argue that those 2 teams weren't the best in the West, yet now they play in the same division and only one could make it to the semi-finals. It also gives teams at the top of a very weak conference an advantage to get to the semi-finals over teams in very strong ones. So, I'm not a huge fan of the new playoff system.

No you're right with the Canucks and Sharks the best teams in the West last year and wouldn't have faced off in round 3 under this format. But I can go to years where it wasn't the best teams that made it. The Canes weren't one of the best teams in the East in 09. They earned it to get there but Pens/Bruins were better. Same in 2010 with the Habs and 2006 with the Oilers. They earned their ways there but weren't the best teams the way the Sharks and Nucks clearly were. Well Canucks anyways I can't say if the Wings were there that they were "worse" than the Sharks.

I've seen the Wings lose early to crap teams. Seen them get the 4th seed because they didn't win the central and in round 2 with the Blues gone they were the best team record wise still remaining in the playoffs but got the Avs in round 2 and started on the road. That didn't seem right either. And I mentioned early about the Canes in 02 being the 16th team in the playoffs but got home ice in round 1 and with the 1st and 2nd teams out got it in rounds 2 and 3 as well. So I won't be one to sit here and say it's unfair to my team when I've seen the old system be "unfair" to them as well.

Bron Yr Aur 12-06-2011 10:04 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TMoore4075 (Post 13165607)
No you're right with the Canucks and Sharks the best teams in the West last year and wouldn't have faced off in round 3 under this format. But I can go to years where it wasn't the best teams that made it. The Canes weren't one of the best teams in the East in 09. They earned it to get there but Pens/Bruins were better. Same in 2010 with the Habs and 2006 with the Oilers. They earned their ways there but weren't the best teams the way the Sharks and Nucks clearly were. Well Canucks anyways I can't say if the Wings were there that they were "worse" than the Sharks.

I've seen the Wings lose early to crap teams. Seen them get the 4th seed because they didn't win the central and in round 2 with the Blues gone they were the best team record wise still remaining in the playoffs but got the Avs in round 2 and started on the road. That didn't seem right either. And I mentioned early about the Canes in 02 being the 16th team in the playoffs but got home ice in round 1 and with the 1st and 2nd teams out got it in rounds 2 and 3 as well. So I won't be one to sit here and say it's unfair to my team when I've seen the old system be "unfair" to them as well.

Yeah, I mean, with any system there are going to be some...inequalities.

But I think the fact that the two "Eastern" conferences have 1 fewer team gives them a significant statistical advantage in their odds to reach the playoffs.

~Crashintome89~ 12-06-2011 10:21 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dduncan6er (Post 13165313)
I'd love to see the Bruins division named after Orr just to see how pissed everyone in Montreal would be.

Rioting in the streets.

TMoore4075 12-06-2011 10:21 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bron Yr Aur (Post 13165678)
Yeah, I mean, with any system there are going to be some...inequalities.

But I think the fact that the two "Eastern" conferences have 1 fewer team gives them a significant statistical advantage in their odds to reach the playoffs.

I do see that it being a slight advantage in terms of just numbers but again that's the nature of things with 30 teams. Bettman even said this leaves room for flexibility. IE when PHX doesn't sell we can move them East or if they happen to end up in the middle of the States like Kansas City, we can move CBJ or Detroit into that conference with Boston and them.

And I wanna say I like a 1-8 playoff but being selfish I hate it on my team. The travel is a big deal. SJ series alone the Wings were on a plane for about 25 hours total in one round. And for the fans the 10pm or later games suck. I can't do that anymore with a kid at home and a job where I have to get up at 6. It really sucked staying up only to have them lose. lol Plus the rivalries will be ratcheted it up a bit when you are not only fighting for playoff spots with these teams but then meet them in the playoffs.So while this is far from perfect I think it's the best they can do right now.

brew10 12-06-2011 11:05 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Two for Tootoo... Right call?

fonzz41 12-06-2011 12:06 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
^^ Here's the link to Sheriff Shanny in case anyone wants to view: http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=605024

I'm well aware of the speed of the game and how hard it can sometimes be to minimize contact or avoid a collision altogether, but from my vantage point (which, as a viewer is not always perfect), Tootoo could have at least minimized contact on that play. I'm ok with the supplemental discipline handed out on this one.

And, like I said before, I LOVED Miller's response. I would've done the exact same thing coming off a concussion that happened because of a similar play. Way to see him stand up for himself, and for the rest of the team to do the same.

fonzz41 12-06-2011 12:10 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Crashintome89~ (Post 13163810)
are we brothers from another mother?

EDIT: I like to drink, you don't. Probably not then.

:lol But I would still BUY you a drink perhaps. Does that count?

Giant Jew 12-06-2011 12:36 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fonzz41 (Post 13166114)
^^ Here's the link to Sheriff Shanny in case anyone wants to view: http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=605024

I'm well aware of the speed of the game and how hard it can sometimes be to minimize contact or avoid a collision altogether, but from my vantage point (which, as a viewer is not always perfect), Tootoo could have at least minimized contact on that play. I'm ok with the supplemental discipline handed out on this one.

And, like I said before, I LOVED Miller's response. I would've done the exact same thing coming off a concussion that happened because of a similar play. Way to see him stand up for himself, and for the rest of the team to do the same.


:thumbsup:thumbsup I can't believe some people were criticizing the Sabres for this after what happened with Lucic. What the hell did people expect them to do?

I think the two game suspension is fair. I know some Sabres fans wanted much more than this, but I'm completely fine with two. Looking back though, if this deserved two, then I don't see how the Lucic didn't deserve two as well

TMoore4075 12-06-2011 01:06 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Giant Jew (Post 13166212)
:thumbsup:thumbsup I can't believe some people were criticizing the Sabres for this after what happened with Lucic. What the hell did people expect them to do?

I think the two game suspension is fair. I know some Sabres fans wanted much more than this, but I'm completely fine with two. Looking back though, if this deserved two, then I don't see how the Lucic didn't deserve two as well

That was the thing Shanny was gonna have a problem with. You give Tootoo anything people are gonna be like what about Lucic. However, imo, Tootoo's was a little worse. I mean he launched himself at Miller, and I think going for his head. Lucic was still on purpose though don't get me wrong.

dduncan6er 12-06-2011 02:10 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Meh I'm not sure I agree with the suspension. Tootoo didn't really have anywhere to go in that situation.

fonzz41 12-06-2011 02:14 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dduncan6er (Post 13166444)
Meh I'm not sure I agree with the suspension. Tootoo didn't really have anywhere to go in that situation.

I agree he couldn't have changed direction, but could he have minimized contact (i.e. slowed down)? I'm thinking he may have been able to.

dduncan6er 12-06-2011 03:22 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
I dunno it seemed to me like it was just a tough goaltender interference. If the lucic incident hadn't just happened there isn't even a disciplinary hearing let alone a suspension imo.

lockman21 12-06-2011 03:23 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Toews is a God. IMO, him and Crosby are the two best players in the NHL, everyone else is a step below those two.

And yes, I think he is getting on Crosby's level.

dduncan6er 12-06-2011 03:25 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Tim Thomas is the best player in the world.

lockman21 12-06-2011 03:27 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Could you imagine if the Pens drafted Toews instead of Jordan Staal?

Jesus.

~Crashintome89~ 12-06-2011 03:28 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
You know who is on OMGCG's level?

No one.

lockman21 12-06-2011 03:30 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Crashintome89~ (Post 13166610)
You know who is on OMGCG's level?

No one.

He sucks too much, you're right.

Toews
Crosby





Patrick Kane















Matt Cooke
















Beer league benders












Claude Giroux

Roose13 12-06-2011 03:31 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Chris is a bad person.

fonzz41 12-06-2011 03:34 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Crashintome89~ (Post 13166610)
You know who is on OMGCG's level?

No one.

:thumbsup:thumbsup
Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 13166613)
He sucks too much, you're right.

Toews
Crosby





Patrick Kane















Matt Cooke
















Beer league benders












Claude Giroux

May God have mercy on your soul

fonzz41 12-06-2011 03:38 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
But I do agree with Chris about Toews and Crosby. The way they play the game is a bit different, but it's their attitude that elevates them to that same level of greatness. That willingness to do whatever it takes and play whatever role to win at the highest level. That's what makes them great players and leaders, even at their age.

lockman21 12-06-2011 03:54 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fonzz41 (Post 13166620)
May God have mercy on your soul

:lol:lol:lol:lol

bonzo48280 12-06-2011 04:11 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Toews > Giroux

Toews has the same number of points in the first 3 games of December that he had in the entire month of October. He never plays well in October. If he stays at this pace it's his Hart Trophy to lose, possibly even the Selke.

~Crashintome89~ 12-06-2011 04:32 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Sure, but has Toews ever healed anyone?

No.

jackisback24 12-06-2011 04:35 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dduncan6er (Post 13164947)
This is getting very old very quick.

:lol:bounce:multi

Bruins!!!! And suck it.

bonzo48280 12-06-2011 04:36 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
no, he does the opposite. He slays: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttigJnJV4XY

bradshaw06 12-06-2011 08:03 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
:lol :lol this past page is hilarious. if the pens would have drafted toews he'd be stuck on the third line like staal.

lockman21 12-06-2011 08:43 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bradshaw06 (Post 13167330)
:lol :lol this past page is hilarious. if the pens would have drafted toews he'd be stuck on the third line like staal.

LOL

Crosby would be sharpening his skates for him.

bonzo48280 12-06-2011 08:46 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 13167445)
LOL

Crosby would be sharpening his skates for him.

:thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup

laura22 12-06-2011 08:47 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
ummm seguin didn't play tonight cuz he missed a team breakfast?! realllly? :lol

aka too hungover to get up for breakfast cuz he's legal in canada :lol

rickyh24 12-06-2011 08:51 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by laura22 (Post 13167456)
ummm seguin didn't play tonight cuz he missed a team breakfast?! realllly? :lol

aka too hungover to get up for breakfast cuz he's legal in canada :lol

I hope that is all there is to it.

kev87lads 12-06-2011 08:52 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
lollerbruins.

:lol

bonzo48280 12-06-2011 08:53 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Toews > Bruins

rickyh24 12-06-2011 08:54 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kev87lads (Post 13167475)
lollerbruins.

:lol

They are playing horrible. Luckily not quite as horrible as the Flyers.

bradshaw06 12-06-2011 11:19 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 13167445)
LOL

Crosby would be sharpening his skates for him.

:lol:lol:lol:lol

kev87lads 12-07-2011 06:10 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rickyh24 (Post 13167484)
They are playing horrible. Luckily not quite as horrible as the Flyers.

14-1-1 stretch. Ba-ru-tull!

Bron Yr Aur 12-07-2011 08:58 AM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lockman21 (Post 13166602)
Toews is a God. IMO, him and Crosby are the two best players in the NHL, everyone else is a step below those two.

And yes, I think he is getting on Crosby's level.

He's on an insane hot streak. That said, you have to let the season play out before this statement could hold any truth. Toews has never gone more than 76 points and, though it's not all about points with Toews, becoming an elite scorer is what he would have to do to get on Crosby's level. Right now, it looks like he's becoming that. But we'll see if the pucks keep going in for him.

The thing that Toews has is faceoff skills that are just significantly better than anyone in the league. He's a full 3.5% better in the dot than anyone in the league.

fonzz41 12-07-2011 12:52 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
(Because I'm bored) If you had to pick some award finalists at this point in the season who would they be?

Mine:
Coach: Kevin Dineen, Mike Yeo, and toss up between Bylsma, Julien, and Tippets

Norris: Chara, Weber, Phaneuf (he's back)

Vezina: Thomas, Jimmy Howard, Mike Smith

Calder: Nugent-Hopkins, Matt Read, toss up between Gabriel Landeskog and Craig Smith

Hart: Kessell, Toews, OMGCG

TMoore4075 12-07-2011 01:30 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Uh oh.

http://penguins.nhl.com/club/news.ht...wt-pghpenguins

~Crashintome89~ 12-07-2011 01:41 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Of course, when I just got tickets to see him tomorrow.

dmbmuskie 12-07-2011 02:09 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
I feel sick.

I'd rather have Stall that Towes, assuming everyone on the Pens is healthy.

dduncan6er 12-07-2011 02:14 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dmbmuskie (Post 13169205)
I feel sick.

I'd rather have Stall that Towes, assuming everyone on the Pens is healthy.

You're nuts off you'd rather have staal than toews. Staal is a good player but toews is elite.

dmbmuskie 12-07-2011 02:17 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dduncan6er (Post 13169216)
You're nuts off you'd rather have staal than toews. Staal is a good player but toews is elite.

So is Staal.

Guy has turned into a 30 goal scorer, and a favorite for the Selke.

~Crashintome89~ 12-07-2011 02:17 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
I hear Toews is already being enshrined into the Hockey Hall of Fame as we speak.

dduncan6er 12-07-2011 02:20 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Staal has never topped 50 points or 30 goals and toews is a selke candidate as well.

dduncan6er 12-07-2011 02:21 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
I take bergeron over staal any day of the week.

fonzz41 12-07-2011 02:28 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ~Crashintome89~ (Post 13169223)
I hear Toews is already being enshrined into the Hockey Hall of Fame as we speak.

:lol:lol:lol You are a fantastic human, Matt.
Quote:

Originally Posted by dduncan6er (Post 13169229)
I take bergeron over staal any day of the week.

Toews
Staal
Bergeron

IMO

dduncan6er 12-07-2011 02:32 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fonzz41 (Post 13169235)
:lol:lol:lol You are a fantastic human, Matt.

Toews
Staal
Bergeron

IMO

I think staal and bergeron are close, but toews is on a different level than them.

bradshaw06 12-07-2011 02:33 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Lol looking at numbers of course people would take taves over staal. Staal plays on the third line with matt cooke and tyler kennedy. You give him first line and pp minutes instead of just es and pk minutes from the start of his career and he likely puts up numbers like taves. Personally, i dont even have taves in my top ten.

fonzz41 12-07-2011 02:33 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dduncan6er (Post 13169243)
I think staal and bergeron are close, but toews is on a different level than them.

Agreed. With that in mind, should be:

Toews

Kevin Dineen



Staal
Bergeron

dduncan6er 12-07-2011 02:35 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bradshaw06 (Post 13169246)
Lol looking at numbers of course people would take taves over staal. Staal plays on the third line with matt cooke and tyler kennedy. You give him first line and pp minutes instead of just es and pk minutes from the start of his career and he likely puts up numbers like taves. Personally, i dont even have taves in my top ten.

You can see the difference just by watching them play. All 3 are very good defensively but toews has much better offensive instincts than bergeron and staal.

fonzz41 12-07-2011 02:41 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Toews - besides his skillset - has this air of quiet dignity and determination about him... not quite sure how to describe it but not every player has it. In 20 years we'll be talking about him the same way we talk about Steve Yzerman and Joe Sakic.

Maybe it's just a #19 thing.

bonzo48280 12-07-2011 02:44 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Toews > Everything

For real though, he needs to keep it up. He always gets going though late in the year and never cools down, this is the first hot streak of his in a while that I remember coming this early. Keep it the hell up.

And I'm sure Crosby will sit out when he has to play the Hawks in about 2 weeks.

bonzo48280 12-07-2011 03:16 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
All Hail:

PK9 Paul Kennedy
The gap between Jonathan Toews (62.3%) and the next best faceoff win% (58.7%) right now is larger than the gap between 2nd & 15th.

Bron Yr Aur 12-07-2011 03:28 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bonzo48280 (Post 13169321)
All Hail:

PK9 Paul Kennedy
The gap between Jonathan Toews (62.3%) and the next best faceoff win% (58.7%) right now is larger than the gap between 2nd & 15th.

On the other hand, Staal is one of the worst in the NHL at the dot this year.

I would love to have Staal, but to say he's on the same plane as Toews is beyond ridiculous. If you had a top 3 C's of Crosby - Malkin - Toews, you wouldn't even need a 4th line. :lol

bonzo48280 12-07-2011 03:37 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bron Yr Aur (Post 13169355)
On the other hand, Staal is one of the worst in the NHL at the dot this year.

I would love to have Staal, but to say he's on the same plane as Toews is beyond ridiculous. If you had a top 3 C's of Crosby - Malkin - Toews, you wouldn't even need a 4th line. :lol

maybe points wise, but if I'm making a team I'm putting Datsyuk at a C and Malkin on a wing

joepsu0985 12-07-2011 04:04 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
This thread is out of control. Jesus.

bonzo48280 12-07-2011 04:26 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
if I were making a team, I would make the 3 best 2-way centers my centers.

Crosby, Toews, Datsyuk

lockman21 12-07-2011 05:14 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bradshaw06 (Post 13169246)
Lol looking at numbers of course people would take taves over staal. Staal plays on the third line with matt cooke and tyler kennedy. You give him first line and pp minutes instead of just es and pk minutes from the start of his career and he likely puts up numbers like taves. Personally, i dont even have taves in my top ten.

:lol:lol:lol:lol:lol You're such a moron.

bonzo48280 12-07-2011 05:19 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bradshaw06 (Post 13169246)
Lol looking at numbers of course people would take taves over staal. Staal plays on the third line with matt cooke and tyler kennedy. You give him first line and pp minutes instead of just es and pk minutes from the start of his career and he likely puts up numbers like taves. Personally, i dont even have taves in my top ten.

:lol :lol


Sabres must be shooting beach balls tonight

EDIT: wow, did that get in? I looked away for a second and its a goal. thats a big goal

Giant Jew 12-07-2011 05:28 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
That was a ridiculous period. Nice work by Kassian. Something tells me he won't be going back to Rochester anytime soon.

Giant Jew 12-07-2011 05:44 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Ryan Miller just made a save with his head without his helmet on. What The Fuck

Bron Yr Aur 12-07-2011 06:13 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Ryan Miller looking awful. Sabres don't look that great every time I watch them.

dduncan6er 12-07-2011 06:16 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bron Yr Aur (Post 13169736)
Ryan Miller looking awful. Sabres don't look that great every time I watch them.

It's all Lucic's fault. Just ask Lindy Ruff.

Giant Jew 12-07-2011 06:16 PM

Re: NHL 2011/2012 Thread
 
Fuck You Buffalo


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.14
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All trademarks and copyrights are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest is owned by antsmarching.org.