|
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
Man Cole finally gets moved. Dunno how i feel. I know he wasnt being re-signed but he has improved.
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
Quote:
I really enjoyed watching Cole over the last few seasons. He's no Kris Letang, but was a solid, steady presence. Played his heart out for the Pens. :thumbsup |
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
Were Penns really that weak down the centre
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
wonder if this forces hextall to make a deal now considering that the penns and flyers are gonna be first round opponents.
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
That seems like a lot to give up, no?
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
Interesting perspective in regards to some of the powerhouse teams of the last decade. Do you go all in and win as much as you can while you can, build up fanbase support by doing so, then allow yourself to suck for a while until you draft more superstars?
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
didn't they have to give up cole to make the cap numbers work
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
Quote:
Quote:
But now, they have what I would think is better depth than the last two years (speaking in terms of center only) Sid, Malkin, Brassard, Sheahan >>>>>> Sid, Malkin, Bonino, Cullen And @ YNK, Mark Madden just said an Ottawa radio station saying Sens keeping some of Brassards salary. |
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
Quote:
But seriously, the idea of building a "consistently" strong team seems less and less of a reality in the cap world where you have to fork over major cash to your superstars. So maybe instead of long-term consistency you plan for a few years of major peaks, followed by a few years of valleys, then hopefully draft well enough during the valley years to get back to the peaks. In that sense, "mortgaging the future" maybe isn't that bad of an idea, especially when you've got Crosbys, Malkins, Kessels, and Letangs on your roster? |
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
I think the last part of what you said is the most important. I don't see how it's a debate: you've got a collection of top-line talent right now that puts you among the best in the league if not the best. what exactly are you planning for in the future that you don't think you should do your best to win with that group? guys who project to that level are not in your system, and aren't on the board when you're drafting.
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
Quote:
EDIT: Just thinking out loud here, guys. |
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
I don't even think it's a matter of planning to suck, it's just--worry about what happens in 2023 when 2023 comes along, you've got sidney crosby and geno malkin in their (late) primes sitting in front of you right now!
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
I think you really gotta rely on scouting and have a keen sense of how the salary cap works at the present time, and projecting your lineup cap-wise in the future.
tl;dr: don't be the Hawks. |
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
Quote:
Quote:
The danger, of course, is getting lost in the weeds. The Canadiens, Islanders and Oilers had their vast successes in the 70’s and 80’s, but have had more rough patches than successes since then. |
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
Quote:
And to be clear, I'm not saying a team should only plan on 2-3 good years and then start sucking again. If you can find and draft Crosby types during your down years, you're looking at a decade of good years if you build well around them (ahem, Oilers). Good point about those teams that haven't been able to dig themselves out of the cellar after succeeding for long periods of time. Like Matt said, this kind of mentality really puts a strong focus on good scouting. |
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
can you guys stop talking about high draft picks and winning. i'm triggered.
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
Brassard to Pens and they dont have to give up Sheary or Sprong, im in. Lets goooooooooooo
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
cole might be headed back to the metro, according to Eklund.
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
Quote:
Of course, the Avs had their historically bad season last year and still ended up drafting at #4 :lol. But, then again, they got an absolute steal in Cale Makar. |
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
Quote:
|
Re: The NHL Thread (Golden Knights are alright)
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:07 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.14
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All trademarks and copyrights are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest is owned by antsmarching.org.