Quote:
Originally Posted by MOWJO8185
I believe the record company forced a date, but there's no way they forced less songs. Bigger albums are how money is made these days with revenue coming from individual song streams. The record label would have never said, no, cut those songs, even if those songs were garbage - they will make money off of them in the new streaming business model. 12 songs instead of more was either John deciding the extra songs didn't fit/not liking them anymore, or John not having them done by the time of the record label's forced date.
|
I don't think bigger albums is how many is made these days. Show me the last mainstream band of any genre that has an album that's more than 15 or 16 songs. Most artists are putting out albums of 10-12 songs consistently.
Wouldn't all these artists just put out massive albums if that was the case?
A ton of music dumped at once is too much for most listeners and they would still just focus on the couple of singles released.
That being said, JM made it sound like he was coming out with a double album or something and that's why he was releasing it in waves. That made sense to me. Digesting 4 songs at a time up to 20 plus rather than just getting it all at once. The listener is more prone to give those song time and would spend more time streaming 4 songs multiple times as opposed to 20 at once and then picking a handful they enjoy to repeat.
I thought it was a cool idea, and was hoping it would just continue for the year. Maybe he has plans to release another album later on or something doing the same thing?