Quote:
Originally Posted by javierm27
I think you have to realize a couple of things, while they are trying to build their cinematic universe, I don't think that connecting shows to movies is as important to them. You never know how TV shows are going to turn out, they may get cancelled, there is usually a lack of quality when you think about TV and movie actors, and if you build up this connection, what happens in a scenario when a show gets canned? At the same time, the shows allow you to create a back story for characters that you may not have time for in a movie. If you try so hard to connect the two you are putting limits and constraints on the writers for both mediums. The show writers/producers will have to meet with the movie writers/producers to make sure that they are in sync, which honestly can become disastrous.
|
well hang on, either you're connecting the shows with the movies or you're not, you can't have it both ways (and obviously by "you" I mean the execs, not YOU lol). So you can't like create a show with a totally different actor for the character, but then as we go along say "okay so what's happening in this particular episode is further background info for the big JL guy".
but I totally get you on the concern about TV that that's more susceptible to taking hits and being canceled early. The main reason why I'd been saying for a long damn time, that even though they took forever to give Agents Of Shield a s2 greenlight, I had no doubt it would happen, because that series would get much longer of a leash than most other new network hour-longs, especially with not great ratings, because it's tied into this other material the studio has a fuck ton of money and resources invested in. But so anyway, I'm thinking, with all the different characters you could go to for a TV series, it does still seem kind of odd to then pick one that you're also creating new for the film franchise at about the same time.